| Literature DB >> 33680684 |
Gesche Frohwitter1, Christopher-Philipp Nobis1, Manuel Weber1, Nicolai Oetter1, Andrea Rau1, Marco R Kesting1, Rainer Lutz1.
Abstract
Free flap monitoring and early detection of malperfusion are a central aspect in reconstructive surgery. Warm ischemia, measured as the time a certain tissue is able to survive without any additional medical or thermal treatment, ranges from hours in muscle and nerval tissue up to days in bony tissue. Hence, meticulous flap monitoring is essential to discover early signs of malperfusion and decide upon timely re-intervention. Besides clinical examination techniques and Doppler sonography, a multitude of mostly experimental procedures are available to evaluate free flap perfusion. Particularly in older patients, the assessment of the skin island in microvascular grafts is a demanding task because the natural loss of elasticity, the reduction of subcutaneous tissue, and the decrease in water content limit the visibility of capillary filling and favor hematomas. We report a case of a 90-year-old woman with an extensive cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the right zygomatic and lateral orbital region without any locoregional or distant metastasis. Due to the resilient health status, we decided for a surgical approach with consecutive microvascular radial forearm flap reconstruction. On account of the difficult assessment of elderly skin after microvascular transplantation, we decided on additional flap monitoring by thermal heat imaging during the operation and aftercare. This case report discusses the successful application of thermal heat imaging in a clinical non-assessable free flap and discusses the application of dynamic infrared thermography as a monitoring tool in microvascular free flap surgery.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33680684 PMCID: PMC7929496 DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003440
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open ISSN: 2169-7574
Recommendations and Disadvantages for Thermal Heat Imaging as an Additional Diagnostic Tool
| Recommendation for THI as an Additional Diagnostic Tool | Literature | Disadvantages of THI | Literature |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free flap monitoring and detection of vascular obstruction | Cruz-Segura A et al (2019). Early detection of vascular obstruction in microvascular flaps using a thermographic camera. | Intraoral free flap monitoring | Meyer A et al. (2020). Thermal imaging for microvascular free tissue transfer monitoring: Feasibility study using a low-cost, commercially available mobile phone imaging system. |
| Perforator vessel detection | Hardwicke JT et al (2016). Detection of perforators using smartphone thermal imaging. | Differentiation between venous and arterial vessel obstruction. | John HE et al. (2016). Clinical applications of dynamic infrared thermography in plastic surgery: a systematic review. |
| Detection of carpal tunnel syndrome | Herrick RT et al (1987). Thermography in the detection of carpal tunnel syndrome and other compressive neuropathies. | Usage in low and high ambient room temperature differences to monitor the same patient/free flap | Authors’ experience |
| Assessment of burn wounds | John HE et al (2016). Clinical applications of dynamic infrared thermography in plastic surgery: a systematic review. | Usage in patients with high catecholamine doses | Authors’ experience |
| Assessment of peripheral perfusion in vascular patients | John HE et al (2016). Clinical applications of dynamic infrared thermography in plastic surgery: a systematic review. | ||
| Melanoma detection | Maillard G et al (1969). Thermography of malignant melanoma. Preliminary report. |
Fig. 1.Clinical situation at the initial presentation at the outpatient clinic.
Fig. 2.Thermal heat image with a highly cooled down transplant after raising of the flap before dissecting the pedicle at the donor site.
Fig. 3.Thermal heat image of the hyper-perfused, healed flap 10 days after surgery.
Fig. 4.Clinical situation at hospital discharge, 10 days after surgery.
Video 1.Video 1 from “Thermal Imaging in a Clinically Non-assessable Free Flap Reconstruction of the Face”