Literature DB >> 33680337

A probabilistic model to evaluate the effectiveness of main solutions to COVID-19 spreading in university buildings according to proximity and time-based consolidated criteria.

Marco D'Orazio1, Gabriele Bernardini1, Enrico Quagliarini1.   

Abstract

University buildings are one of the most relevant closed environments in which the COVID-19 event clearly pointed out stakeholders' needs toward safety issues, especially because of the possibility of day-to-day presences of the same users (i.e. students, teachers) and overcrowding causing long-lasting contacts with possible "infectors". While waiting for the vaccine, as for other public buildings, policy-makers' measures to limit virus outbreaks combine individual's strategies (facial masks), occupants' capacity and access control. But, up to now, no easy-to-apply tools are available for assessing the punctual effectiveness of such measures. To fill this gap, this work proposes a quick and probabilistic simulation model based on consolidated proximity and exposure-time-based rules for virus transmission confirmed by international health organizations. The building occupancy is defined according to university scheduling, identifying the main "attraction areas" in the building (classrooms, break-areas). Scenarios are defined in terms of occupants' densities and the above-mentioned mitigation strategies. The model is calibrated on experimental data and applied to a relevant university building. Results demonstrate the model capabilities. In particular, it underlines that if such strategies are not combined, the virus spreading can be limited by only using high protection respiratory devices (i.e. FFP3) by almost every occupant. On the contrary, the combination between access control and building capacity limitation can lead to the adoption of lighter protective devices (i.e. surgical masks), thus improving the feasibility, users' comfort and favorable reception. Simplified rules to combine acceptable mask filters-occupants' density are thus provided to help stakeholders in organizing users' presences in the building during the pandemic. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL ESM: supplementary material is available in the online version of this article at 10.1007/s12273-021-0770-2.
© The Author(s) 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; building occupancy; closed built environment; crowd models; proximity exposure; simulation model

Year:  2021        PMID: 33680337      PMCID: PMC7910197          DOI: 10.1007/s12273-021-0770-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Build Simul        ISSN: 1996-3599            Impact factor:   3.751


  29 in total

1.  Common cold among young adults in China without a history of asthma or allergic rhinitis - associations with warmer climate zone, dampness and mould at home, and outdoor PM10 and PM2.5.

Authors:  Chan Lu; Dan Norbäck; Yinping Zhang; Baizhan Li; Zhuohui Zhao; Chen Huang; Xin Zhang; Hua Qian; Juan Wang; Wei Liu; Xu Yang; Yuexia Sun; Jan Sundell; Qihong Deng
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2020-08-10       Impact factor: 7.963

2.  How will country-based mitigation measures influence the course of the COVID-19 epidemic?

Authors:  Roy M Anderson; Hans Heesterbeek; Don Klinkenberg; T Déirdre Hollingsworth
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  COVID-19 indoor exposure levels: An analysis of foot traffic scenarios within an academic building.

Authors:  Van Romero; William D Stone; Julie Dyke Ford
Journal:  Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect       Date:  2020-08-06

4.  Anxiety and safety behavior usage during the COVID-19 pandemic: The prospective role of contamination fear.

Authors:  Kelly A Knowles; Bunmi O Olatunji
Journal:  J Anxiety Disord       Date:  2020-10-20

5.  Mechanistic transmission modeling of COVID-19 on the Diamond Princess cruise ship demonstrates the importance of aerosol transmission.

Authors:  Parham Azimi; Zahra Keshavarz; Jose Guillermo Cedeno Laurent; Brent Stephens; Joseph G Allen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Building Ventilation as an Effective Disease Intervention Strategy in a Dense Indoor Contact Network in an Ideal City.

Authors:  Xiaolei Gao; Jianjian Wei; Hao Lei; Pengcheng Xu; Benjamin J Cowling; Yuguo Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  EXPOSED: An occupant exposure model for confined spaces to retrofit crowd models during a pandemic.

Authors:  Enrico Ronchi; Ruggiero Lovreglio
Journal:  Saf Sci       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 4.877

8.  The Incubation Period of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) From Publicly Reported Confirmed Cases: Estimation and Application.

Authors:  Stephen A Lauer; Kyra H Grantz; Qifang Bi; Forrest K Jones; Qulu Zheng; Hannah R Meredith; Andrew S Azman; Nicholas G Reich; Justin Lessler
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 9.  Can we contain the COVID-19 outbreak with the same measures as for SARS?

Authors:  Annelies Wilder-Smith; Calvin J Chiew; Vernon J Lee
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 25.071

10.  Initial impacts of global risk mitigation measures taken during the combatting of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Yuri Bruinen de Bruin; Anne-Sophie Lequarre; Josephine McCourt; Peter Clevestig; Filippo Pigazzani; Maryam Zare Jeddi; Claudio Colosio; Margarida Goulart
Journal:  Saf Sci       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 6.392

View more
  7 in total

1.  Propagation and Diffusion of Fluorescent Substances with Footprints in Indoor Environments.

Authors:  Manman Ma; Fei Li; Hao Han; Ziwang Zhao; Yuxiao Sun; Yuanqi Jing; Lei Wang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 4.614

2.  Close contact behavior-based COVID-19 transmission and interventions in a subway system.

Authors:  Xiyue Liu; Zhiyang Dou; Lei Wang; Boni Su; Tianyi Jin; Yong Guo; Jianjian Wei; Nan Zhang
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 14.224

3.  Tempo-spatial infection risk assessment of airborne virus via CO2 concentration field monitoring in built environment.

Authors:  Haida Tang; Zhenyu Pan; Chunying Li
Journal:  Build Environ       Date:  2022-04-17       Impact factor: 7.093

4.  How distant? An experimental analysis of students' COVID-19 exposure and physical distancing in university buildings.

Authors:  A Bartolucci; A Templeton; G Bernardini
Journal:  Int J Disaster Risk Reduct       Date:  2021-12-29       Impact factor: 4.320

5.  The impact of inspection policies on reducing disease prevalence in public buildings: A systems dynamics approach.

Authors:  Nasim Nahavandi; Mohammad-Ali Gorji
Journal:  Build Environ       Date:  2022-07-30       Impact factor: 7.093

6.  COVID-19 safe campus evaluation for universities by a hybrid interval type-2 fuzzy decision-making model.

Authors:  Dilber Baskak; Sumeyye Ozbey; Melih Yucesan; Muhammet Gul
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 5.190

7.  Workforce Experiences of a Rapidly Established SARS-CoV-2 Asymptomatic Testing Service in a Higher Education Setting: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Holly Blake; Sarah Somerset; Ikra Mahmood; Neelam Mahmood; Jessica Corner; Jonathan K Ball; Chris Denning
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 4.614

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.