Literature DB >> 33680208

The effect of social distancing on the reach of an epidemic in social networks.

Gregory Gutin1, Tomohiro Hirano2, Sung-Ha Hwang3, Philip R Neary2, Alexis Akira Toda4.   

Abstract

How does social distancing affect the reach of an epidemic in social networks? We present Monte Carlo simulation results of a susceptible-infected-removed with social distancing model. The key feature of the model is that individuals are limited in the number of acquaintances that they can interact with, thereby constraining disease transmission to an infectious subnetwork of the original social network. While increased social distancing typically reduces the spread of an infectious disease, the magnitude varies greatly depending on the topology of the network, indicating the need for policies that are network dependent. Our results also reveal the importance of coordinating policies at the 'global' level. In particular, the public health benefits from social distancing to a group (e.g. a country) may be completely undone if that group maintains connections with outside groups that are not following suit.
© The Author(s) 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BA scale-free networks; Infectious subnetwork; SIRwSD model; Social distancing; WS small-world networks

Year:  2021        PMID: 33680208      PMCID: PMC7925813          DOI: 10.1007/s11403-021-00322-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Econ Interact Coord        ISSN: 1860-711X


  12 in total

1.  Emergence of scaling in random networks

Authors: 
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-10-15       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Epidemic spreading in scale-free networks.

Authors:  R Pastor-Satorras; A Vespignani
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2001-04-02       Impact factor: 9.161

3.  Intermittent social distancing strategy for epidemic control.

Authors:  L D Valdez; P A Macri; L A Braunstein
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2012-03-22

4.  Age differences in adults' daily social interactions: An ecological momentary assessment study.

Authors:  Ruixue Zhaoyang; Martin J Sliwinski; Lynn M Martire; Joshua M Smyth
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2018-04-30

5.  Collective dynamics of 'small-world' networks.

Authors:  D J Watts; S H Strogatz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-06-04       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Game theory of social distancing in response to an epidemic.

Authors:  Timothy C Reluga
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 4.475

7.  Early Transmission Dynamics in Wuhan, China, of Novel Coronavirus-Infected Pneumonia.

Authors:  Qun Li; Xuhua Guan; Peng Wu; Xiaoye Wang; Lei Zhou; Yeqing Tong; Ruiqi Ren; Kathy S M Leung; Eric H Y Lau; Jessica Y Wong; Xuesen Xing; Nijuan Xiang; Yang Wu; Chao Li; Qi Chen; Dan Li; Tian Liu; Jing Zhao; Man Liu; Wenxiao Tu; Chuding Chen; Lianmei Jin; Rui Yang; Qi Wang; Suhua Zhou; Rui Wang; Hui Liu; Yinbo Luo; Yuan Liu; Ge Shao; Huan Li; Zhongfa Tao; Yang Yang; Zhiqiang Deng; Boxi Liu; Zhitao Ma; Yanping Zhang; Guoqing Shi; Tommy T Y Lam; Joseph T Wu; George F Gao; Benjamin J Cowling; Bo Yang; Gabriel M Leung; Zijian Feng
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 176.079

8.  Controlling epidemic spread by social distancing: do it well or not at all.

Authors:  Savi Maharaj; Adam Kleczkowski
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Covid19: Unless one gets everyone to act, policies may be ineffective or even backfire.

Authors:  Alessio Muscillo; Paolo Pin; Tiziano Razzolini
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Endogenous viral mutations, evolutionary selection, and containment policy design.

Authors:  Patrick Mellacher
Journal:  J Econ Interact Coord       Date:  2022-01-07
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.