Literature DB >> 33679929

Assessing the educational impact of cognitive level of MCQ and SEQ on learning approaches of dental students.

Mahwish Arooj1, Khadijah Mukhtar2, Rehan Ahmed Khan3, Tayyaba Azhar4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: MCQ's and SEQ's are the most widely used assessment tool in dental colleges across Pakistan. This study explores the impact of assessment tool: MCQ's and SEQ's on learning approach of dental students and also identifies correlation between these assessment tools and deep & surface learning approaches in integrated and discipline based curriculum.
METHODS: A quantitative co-relational study was conducted in 2018 on 2nd and 4th year dental students. A pre-validated "Revised Study Process Questionnaire" was used. Spearman's rho correlation coefficient and Wilcoxon signed ranks test were applied to determine the relationship between learning approaches and assessment tools. Internal consistency was calculated by Cronbach's alpha.
RESULTS: Ninety six students out of one hundred and fifty completed the questionnaire. Correlation test showed that surface approach correlates significantly with MCQ's (0.73) while no co-relation exists with SEQ's (-0.14) in our study. Deep approach has a strong and significant correlation with SEQ's (0.80) as compared to MCQ's (0.056).
CONCLUSION: Assessment tool has an impact on learning approaches used by the students. It was concluded that students used to prefer deep learning approach while preparing for SEQ's as they were designed at higher cognitive level, whereas, they preferred surface approach while preparing for MCQ's as they were developed at low cognitive order. Copyright: © Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Learning approaches; MCQ’s and SEQ’s; Study Process Questionnaire (SPQ)

Year:  2021        PMID: 33679929      PMCID: PMC7931318          DOI: 10.12669/pjms.37.2.3475

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pak J Med Sci        ISSN: 1681-715X            Impact factor:   1.088


  15 in total

Review 1.  Faculty development: yesterday, today and tomorrow.

Authors:  Michelle McLean; Francois Cilliers; Jacqueline M Van Wyk
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.650

2.  Students' approaches to learning and their experiences of the teaching-learning environment in different disciplines.

Authors:  Anna Parpala; Sari Lindblom-Ylänne; Erkki Komulainen; Topi Litmanen; Laura Hirsto
Journal:  Br J Educ Psychol       Date:  2009-11-10

3.  Learning approaches as predictors of academic performance in first year health and science students.

Authors:  Yenna Salamonson; Roslyn Weaver; Sungwon Chang; Jane Koch; Ragbir Bhathal; Cheang Khoo; Ian Wilson
Journal:  Nurse Educ Today       Date:  2013-02-11       Impact factor: 3.442

4.  Correlation of MCQ and SEQ scores in written undergraduate ophthalmology assessment.

Authors:  Hamid Mahmood
Journal:  J Coll Physicians Surg Pak       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 0.711

Review 5.  Medical Student Research: An Integrated Mixed-Methods Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Mohamed Amgad; Marco Man Kin Tsui; Sarah J Liptrott; Emad Shash
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Evaluation of Multiple Choice and Short Essay Question items in Basic Medical Sciences.

Authors:  Mukhtiar Baig; Syeda Kauser Ali; Sobia Ali; Nighat Huda
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.088

7.  Learning approach among health sciences students in a medical college in Nepal: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Dev Kumar Shah; Ram Lochan Yadav; Deepak Sharma; Prakash Kumar Yadav; Niraj Khatri Sapkota; Rajesh Kumar Jha; Md Nazrul Islam
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2016-03-04

8.  Psychometric analysis of Anatomy MCQs in Modular examination.

Authors:  Zia Ul Islam; Ambreen Usmani
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2017 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.088

9.  Multiple-choice exams: an obstacle for higher-level thinking in introductory science classes.

Authors:  Kathrin F Stanger-Hall
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 10.  Deep and surface learning in problem-based learning: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Diana H J M Dolmans; Sofie M M Loyens; Hélène Marcq; David Gijbels
Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 3.853

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.