Literature DB >> 33679848

How Does the Waterlogging Regime Affect Crop Yield? A Global Meta-Analysis.

Li-Xin Tian1, Yu-Chuan Zhang1, Peng-Liang Chen1, Fei-Fei Zhang1, Jing Li2, Feng Yan3, Yang Dong3, Bai-Li Feng1.   

Abstract

Waterlogging, an abiotic stress, severely restricts crop yield in various parts of the world. Thus, we conducted a meta-analysis of 2,419 comparisons from 115 studies to comprehensively evaluate the overall change in crop yield induced by waterlogging in the global region. The results suggested that waterlogging obviously decreased crop yield by 32.9% on average, compared with no waterlogging, which was a result of a reduced 1,000-grain weight (13.67%), biomass (28.89%), plant height (10.68%), net photosynthetic rate (P n , 39.04%), and leaf area index (LAI, 22.89%). The overall effect of a waterlogging regime on crop yield is related to the crop type; the crop yield reduction varied between wheat (25.53%) and cotton (59.95%), with an overall average value of 36.81% under field conditions. In addition, we also found that compared with no waterlogging, waterlogging in the reproductive growth stage (41.90%) caused a greater yield reduction than in the vegetative growth stage (34.75%). Furthermore, decreases in crop yield were observed with an extension in the waterlogging duration; the greatest decreases in crop yield occurred at 15 < D ≤ 28 (53.19 and 55.96%) under field and potted conditions, respectively. Overall, the results of this meta-analysis showed that waterlogging can decrease crop yield and was mainly affected by crop type, growth stage, and experimental duration.
Copyright © 2021 Tian, Zhang, Chen, Zhang, Li, Yan, Dong and Feng.

Entities:  

Keywords:  crop type; grain yield; growth stage; meta-analysis; waterlogging duration

Year:  2021        PMID: 33679848      PMCID: PMC7933672          DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2021.634898

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Plant Sci        ISSN: 1664-462X            Impact factor:   5.753


  4 in total

1.  Waterlogging tolerance and recovery capability screening in peanut: a comparative analysis of waterlogging effects on physiological traits and yield.

Authors:  Ruier Zeng; Jing Cao; Xi Li; Xinyue Wang; Ying Wang; Suzhe Yao; Yu Gao; Jing Hu; Mingzhu Luo; Lei Zhang; Tingting Chen
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 2.  Phenotyping for waterlogging tolerance in crops: current trends and future prospects.

Authors:  Patrick Langan; Villő Bernád; Jason Walsh; Joey Henchy; Mortaza Khodaeiaminjan; Eleni Mangina; Sónia Negrão
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2022-09-03       Impact factor: 7.298

3.  ABA Biosynthesis and Signaling Cascades Under Hypoxia Stress.

Authors:  Qichao Wang; Lei Wang; Umashankar Chandrasekaran; Xiaofeng Luo; Chuan Zheng; Kai Shu
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 5.753

4.  Effects of oxygen fertilization on damage reduction in flooded snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.).

Authors:  Danyang Liu; Anna-Lisa Paul; Kelly T Morgan; Guodong Liu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.