Riemer J K Vegter1, Sebastiaan van den Brink1, Leonora J Mouton1, Anita Sibeijn-Kuiper2, Lucas H V van der Woude1,3, Jeroen A L Jeneson2,4. 1. Center for Human Movement Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands. 2. Department of Biomedical Sciences of Cells and Systems, Cognitive Neuroscience Center, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands. 3. Center for Rehabilitation, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands. 4. Center for Child Development and Exercise, Wilhelmina's Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Evaluation of the effect of human upper-body training regimens may benefit from knowledge of local energy expenditure in arm muscles. To that end, we developed a novel arm-crank ergometry platform for use in a clinical magnetic resonance (MR) scanner with 31P spectroscopy capability to study arm muscle energetics. Complementary datasets on heart-rate, whole-body oxygen consumption, proximal arm-muscle electrical activity and power output, were obtained in a mock-up scanner. The utility of the platform was tested by a preliminary study over 4 weeks of skill practice on the efficiency of execution of a dynamic arm-cranking task in healthy subjects. RESULTS: The new platform successfully recorded the first ever in vivo 31P MR spectra from the human biceps brachii (BB) muscle during dynamic exercise in five healthy subjects. Changes in BB energy- and pH balance varied considerably between individuals. Surface electromyography and mechanical force recordings revealed that individuals employed different arm muscle recruitment strategies, using either predominantly elbow flexor muscles (pull strategy; two subjects), elbow extensor muscles (push strategy; one subject) or a combination of both (two subjects). The magnitude of observed changes in BB energy- and pH balance during ACT execution correlated closely with each strategy. Skill practice improved muscle coordination but did not alter individual strategies. Mechanical efficiency on group level seemed to increase as a result of practice, but the outcomes generated by the new platform showed the additional caution necessary for the interpretation that total energy cost was actually reduced at the same workload. CONCLUSION: The presented platform integrates dynamic in vivo 31P MRS recordings from proximal arm muscles with whole-body calorimetry, surface electromyography and biomechanical measurements. This new methodology enables evaluation of cyclic motor performance and outcomes of upper-body training regimens in healthy novices. It may be equally useful for investigations of exercise physiology in lower-limb impaired athletes and wheelchair users as well as frail patients including patients with debilitating muscle disease and the elderly.
INTRODUCTION: Evaluation of the effect of human upper-body training regimens may benefit from knowledge of local energy expenditure in arm muscles. To that end, we developed a novel arm-crank ergometry platform for use in a clinical magnetic resonance (MR) scanner with 31P spectroscopy capability to study arm muscle energetics. Complementary datasets on heart-rate, whole-body oxygen consumption, proximal arm-muscle electrical activity and power output, were obtained in a mock-up scanner. The utility of the platform was tested by a preliminary study over 4 weeks of skill practice on the efficiency of execution of a dynamic arm-cranking task in healthy subjects. RESULTS: The new platform successfully recorded the first ever in vivo 31P MR spectra from the human biceps brachii (BB) muscle during dynamic exercise in five healthy subjects. Changes in BB energy- and pH balance varied considerably between individuals. Surface electromyography and mechanical force recordings revealed that individuals employed different arm muscle recruitment strategies, using either predominantly elbow flexor muscles (pull strategy; two subjects), elbow extensor muscles (push strategy; one subject) or a combination of both (two subjects). The magnitude of observed changes in BB energy- and pH balance during ACT execution correlated closely with each strategy. Skill practice improved muscle coordination but did not alter individual strategies. Mechanical efficiency on group level seemed to increase as a result of practice, but the outcomes generated by the new platform showed the additional caution necessary for the interpretation that total energy cost was actually reduced at the same workload. CONCLUSION: The presented platform integrates dynamic in vivo 31P MRS recordings from proximal arm muscles with whole-body calorimetry, surface electromyography and biomechanical measurements. This new methodology enables evaluation of cyclic motor performance and outcomes of upper-body training regimens in healthy novices. It may be equally useful for investigations of exercise physiology in lower-limb impaired athletes and wheelchair users as well as frail patients including patients with debilitating muscle disease and the elderly.
Authors: Sonja De Groot; Dirkan H E J Veeger; A Peter Hollander; Lucas H V Van der Woude Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Elisabeth K Simmelink; Emilie C Borgesius; Florentina J Hettinga; Jan H B Geertzen; Rienk Dekker; Lucas H V van der Woude Journal: Int J Rehabil Res Date: 2015-03 Impact factor: 1.479
Authors: Marco van Brussel; Joep W M van Oorschot; Joep P J Schmitz; Klaas Nicolay; Annet van Royen-Kerkhof; Tim Takken; Jeroen A L Jeneson Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 2015-08-08 Impact factor: 3.173
Authors: Joep P J Schmitz; Natal A W van Riel; Klaas Nicolay; Peter A J Hilbers; Jeroen A L Jeneson Journal: Exp Physiol Date: 2009-10-02 Impact factor: 2.969
Authors: Ingrid Kouwijzer; Mitch Valize; Linda J M Valent; Paul Grandjean Perrenod Comtesse; Lucas H V van der Woude; Sonja de Groot Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2019-08-21 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: Riemer J K Vegter; Claudine J Lamoth; Sonja de Groot; Dirkjan H E J Veeger; Lucas H V van der Woude Journal: J Neuroeng Rehabil Date: 2013-01-29 Impact factor: 4.262
Authors: Cassandra Kraaijenbrink; Riemer J K Vegter; Alexander H R Hensen; Heiko Wagner; Lucas H V van der Woude Journal: J Neuroeng Rehabil Date: 2020-02-24 Impact factor: 4.262
Authors: Laura E Habets; Bart Bartels; Fay-Lynn Asselman; Melissa T Hooijmans; Sandra van den Berg; Aart J Nederveen; W Ludo van der Pol; Jeroen A L Jeneson Journal: Brain Date: 2022-05-24 Impact factor: 15.255