Literature DB >> 33679355

No Impact of Stochastic Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation on Arterial Pressure and Heart Rate Variability in the Elderly Population.

Akiyoshi Matsugi1, Koji Nagino2, Tomoyuki Shiozaki3, Yohei Okada4,5,6, Nobuhiko Mori7, Junji Nakamura4,8, Shinya Douchi9, Kosuke Oku10, Kiyoshi Nagano1, Yoshiki Tamaru1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Noisy galvanic vestibular stimulation (nGVS) is often used to improve postural stability in disorders, such as neurorehabilitation montage. For the safe use of nGVS, we investigated whether arterial pressure (AP) and heart rate vary during static supine and slow whole-body tilt with random nGVS (0.4 mA, 0.1-640 Hz, gaussian distribution) in a healthy elderly population.
METHODS: This study was conducted with a double-blind, sham-controlled, cross-over design. Seventeen healthy older adults were recruited. They were asked to maintain a static supine position on a bed for 10 min, and the bed was tilted up (TU) to 70 degrees within 30 s. After maintaining this position for 3 min, the bed was passively tilted down (TD) within 30 s. Real-nGVS or sham-nGVS was applied from 4 to 15 min. The time course of mean arterial pressure (MAP) and RR interval variability (RRIV) were analyzed to estimate the autonomic nervous activity. RESULT: nGVS and/or time, including pre-/post-event (nGVS-start, TU, and TD), had no impact on MAP and RRIV-related parameters. Further, there was no evidence supporting the argument that nGVS induces pain, vertigo/dizziness, and uncomfortable feeling.
CONCLUSION: nGVS may not affect the AP and RRIV during static position and whole-body tilting or cause pain, vertigo/dizziness, and discomfort in the elderly.
Copyright © 2021 Matsugi, Nagino, Shiozaki, Okada, Mori, Nakamura, Douchi, Oku, Nagano and Tamaru.

Entities:  

Keywords:  RR interval variability; arterial pressure; galvanic vestibular stimulation; heart rate variability; stochastic resonance; whole-body tilting

Year:  2021        PMID: 33679355      PMCID: PMC7925407          DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.646127

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci        ISSN: 1662-5161            Impact factor:   3.169


  56 in total

Review 1.  Probing the human vestibular system with galvanic stimulation.

Authors:  Richard C Fitzpatrick; Brian L Day
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2004-06

2.  Subsensory galvanic vestibular stimulation augments arterial pressure control upon head-up tilt in human subjects.

Authors:  Kunihiko Tanaka; Chikara Abe; Yuzuru Sakaida; Mitsuhiro Aoki; Chihiro Iwata; Hironobu Morita
Journal:  Auton Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 3.145

3.  Bayesian hypothesis testing in two-arm trials with dichotomous outcomes.

Authors:  Boris G Zaslavsky
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2012-09-24       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 4.  How to analyze the Visual Analogue Scale: Myths, truths and clinical relevance.

Authors:  Gillian Z Heller; Maurizio Manuguerra; Roberta Chow
Journal:  Scand J Pain       Date:  2016-07-27

5.  Noise enhancement of information transfer in crayfish mechanoreceptors by stochastic resonance.

Authors:  J K Douglass; L Wilkens; E Pantazelou; F Moss
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1993-09-23       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Galvanic vestibular stimulation: from basic concepts to clinical applications.

Authors:  Julia Dlugaiczyk; Kathrin D Gensberger; Hans Straka
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Strong galvanic vestibular stimulation obscures arterial pressure response to gravitational change in conscious rats.

Authors:  Chikara Abe; Kunihiko Tanaka; Chihiro Awazu; Hironobu Morita
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2007-10-04

Review 8.  The vestibular system: balancing more than just the body.

Authors:  Christophe Lopez
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 5.710

9.  Bayes factors for superiority, non-inferiority, and equivalence designs.

Authors:  Don van Ravenzwaaij; Rei Monden; Jorge N Tendeiro; John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 4.615

10.  Noisy Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation Sustainably Improves Posture in Bilateral Vestibulopathy.

Authors:  Chisato Fujimoto; Naoya Egami; Takuya Kawahara; Yukari Uemura; Yoshiharu Yamamoto; Tatsuya Yamasoba; Shinichi Iwasaki
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 4.003

View more
  1 in total

1.  Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex Is Modulated by Noisy Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation.

Authors:  Akiyoshi Matsugi; Tomoyuki Shiozaki; Hiroaki Tanaka
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 4.003

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.