Literature DB >> 33679314

Repetitive Peripheral Magnetic Stimulation of Wrist Extensors Enhances Cortical Excitability and Motor Performance in Healthy Individuals.

Mitsuhiro Nito1, Natsuki Katagiri2, Kaito Yoshida2, Tadaki Koseki2, Daisuke Kudo2, Shigehiro Nanba2, Shigeo Tanabe3, Tomofumi Yamaguchi2,4.   

Abstract

Repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation (rPMS) may improve motor function following central nervous system lesions, but the optimal parameters of rPMS to induce neural plasticity and mechanisms underlying its action remain unclear. We examined the effects of rPMS over wrist extensor muscles on neural plasticity and motor performance in 26 healthy volunteers. In separate experiments, the effects of rPMS on motor evoked potentials (MEPs), short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI), intracortical facilitation (ICF), direct motor response (M-wave), Hoffmann-reflex, and ballistic wrist extension movements were assessed before and after rPMS. First, to examine the effects of stimulus frequency, rPMS was applied at 50, 25, and 10 Hz by setting a fixed total number of stimuli. A significant increase in MEPs of wrist extensors was observed following 50 and 25 Hz rPMS, but not 10 Hz rPMS. Next, we examined the time required to induce plasticity by increasing the number of stimuli, and found that at least 15 min of 50 and 25 Hz rPMS was required. Based on these parameters, lasting effects were evaluated following 15 min of 50 or 25 Hz rPMS. A significant increase in MEP was observed up to 60 min following 50 and 25 Hz rPMS; similarly, an attenuation of SICI and enhancement of ICF were also observed. The maximal M-wave and Hoffmann-reflex did not change, suggesting that the increase in MEP was due to plastic changes at the motor cortex. This was accompanied by increasing force and electromyograms during wrist ballistic extension movements following 50 and 25 Hz rPMS. These findings suggest that 15 min of rPMS with 25 Hz or more induces an increase in cortical excitability of the relevant area rather than altering the excitability of spinal circuits, and has the potential to improve motor output.
Copyright © 2021 Nito, Katagiri, Yoshida, Koseki, Kudo, Nanba, Tanabe and Yamaguchi.

Entities:  

Keywords:  corticospinal tract; intracortical circuits; plasticity; rehabilitation; spinal networks; upper extremity

Year:  2021        PMID: 33679314      PMCID: PMC7930341          DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2021.632716

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Neurosci        ISSN: 1662-453X            Impact factor:   4.677


  3 in total

1.  Effects of Repetitive Peripheral Magnetic Stimulation through Hand Splint Materials on Induced Movement and Corticospinal Excitability in Healthy Participants.

Authors:  Akihiko Asao; Tomonori Nomura; Kenichi Shibuya
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-02-17

2.  Checklist on the Quality of the Repetitive Peripheral Magnetic Stimulation (rPMS) Methods in Research: An International Delphi Study.

Authors:  Cyril Schneider; Andrea Zangrandi; Nico Sollmann; Michaela Veronika Bonfert; Louis-David Beaulieu
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 4.003

3.  Body representation underlies response of proprioceptive acuity to repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Yunxiang Xia; Kento Tanaka; Man Yang; Shinichi Izumi
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-08-09       Impact factor: 3.473

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.