Charlène Aubinet1,2, Camille Chatelle1,2, Sophie Gillet3, Nicolas Lejeune1,2,4,5, Margot Thunus3, Noémie Hennen3, Helena Cassol1,2, Steven Laureys1,2, Steve Majerus3. 1. GIGA-Consciousness, GIGA Research Center (B34, +1), University of Liège, Liège, Belgium. 2. Centre Du Cerveau², University Hospital of Liège (B34, +1), Liège, Belgium. 3. Psychology and Neuroscience of Cognition Research Unit, University of Liège, Quartier Agora (B33), Liège, Belgium. 4. Centre Neurologique William Lennox, Ottignies-Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium. 5. Institute of NeuroScience, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Abstract
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: The assessment of language in patients post-comatose patients is limited by their reduced behavioral repertoire. We developed the Brief Evaluation of Receptive Aphasia (BERA) tool for assessing phonological, semantic and morphosyntactic abilities in patients with severe brain injury based on visual fixation responses. RESEARCH DESIGN: Prospective cross-sectional study and case reports. METHODS AND PROCEDURE: The BERA and Language Screening Test were first administered to 52 conscious patients with aphasia on two consecutive days in order to determine the validity and reliability of the BERA. Four post-comatose patients were further examined with the BERA, the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R), positron emission tomography and structural magnetic resonance imaging. MAIN OUTCOME AND RESULTS: The BERA showed satisfactory intra- and inter-rater reliability, as well as internal and concurrent validity in patients with aphasia. The BERA scores indicated selective receptive difficulties for phonological, semantic and particularly morphosyntactic abilities in post-comatose patients. These results were in line with the cortical distribution of brain lesions. CONCLUSIONS: The BERA may complement the widely used CRS-R for assessing and diagnosing patients with disorders of consciousness by providing a systematic and detailed characterization of residual language abilities.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: The assessment of language in patients post-comatosepatients is limited by their reduced behavioral repertoire. We developed the Brief Evaluation of Receptive Aphasia (BERA) tool for assessing phonological, semantic and morphosyntactic abilities in patients with severe brain injury based on visual fixation responses. RESEARCH DESIGN: Prospective cross-sectional study and case reports. METHODS AND PROCEDURE: The BERA and Language Screening Test were first administered to 52 conscious patients with aphasia on two consecutive days in order to determine the validity and reliability of the BERA. Four post-comatosepatients were further examined with the BERA, the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R), positron emission tomography and structural magnetic resonance imaging. MAIN OUTCOME AND RESULTS: The BERA showed satisfactory intra- and inter-rater reliability, as well as internal and concurrent validity in patients with aphasia. The BERA scores indicated selective receptive difficulties for phonological, semantic and particularly morphosyntactic abilities in post-comatosepatients. These results were in line with the cortical distribution of brain lesions. CONCLUSIONS: The BERA may complement the widely used CRS-R for assessing and diagnosing patients with disorders of consciousness by providing a systematic and detailed characterization of residual language abilities.
Entities:
Keywords:
Coma; aphasia; behavioral assessment; language; minimally conscious state