| Literature DB >> 33677809 |
Colleen T Downs1, Jarryd Alexander2, Mark Brown2, Moses Chibesa2, Yvette C Ehlers Smith2, S Thobeka Gumede2, Lorinda Hart2, Kyrone K Josiah2, Riddhika Kalle2, Machawe Maphalala2, Mfundo Maseko2, Shane McPherson2, Samukelisiwe P Ngcobo2, Lindsay Patterson2, Kerushka Pillay2, Cormac Price2, Islamiat Abidemi Raji2, Tharmalingam Ramesh2, Warren Schmidt2, Ntaki D Senoge2, Tinyiko C Shivambu2, Ndivhuwo Shivambu2, Nikisha Singh2, Preshnee Singh2, Jarryd Streicher2, Vuyisile Thabethe2, Harriet Thatcher2, Craig Widdows2, Amy-Leigh Wilson2, Manqoba M Zungu2, David A Ehlers Smith2.
Abstract
Urbanisation is rapidly transforming natural landscapes with consequences for biodiversity. Little is documented on the response of African wildlife to urbanisation. We reviewed case studies of vertebrate species' responses to urbanisation in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa to determine trends. Connected habitat mosaics of natural and anthropogenic green spaces are critical for urban wildlife persistence. We present a novel modification to the final of three phases of the framework described by Evans et al. (2010), which documents this sequence for vertebrate species persistence, based on the perspective of our research. Species in suburbia exhibit an initial phase where behavioural and ecological flexibility, life-history traits and phenotypic plasticity either contribute to their success, or they stay at low numbers. Where successful, the next phase is a rapid increase in populations and distribution; anthropogenic food resources and alternate breeding sites are effectively exploited. The modified third phase either continues to spread, plateau or decline.Entities:
Keywords: Anthropogenic landscape change; Birds; Ecological flexibility; Mammals; Phenotypic plasticity; Reptiles
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33677809 PMCID: PMC8363720 DOI: 10.1007/s13280-021-01501-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ambio ISSN: 0044-7447 Impact factor: 6.943