Literature DB >> 33677583

ImmuneDEX: a strategy for the genetic improvement of immune competence in Australian Angus cattle.

Antonio Reverter1, Brad C Hine2, Laercio Porto-Neto1, Yutao Li1, Christian J Duff3, Sonja Dominik2, Aaron B Ingham1.   

Abstract

In animal breeding and genetics, the ability to cope with disease, here defined as immune competence (IC), with minimal detriment to growth and fertility is a desired objective which addresses both animal production and welfare considerations. However, defining and objectively measuring IC phenotypes using testing methods which are practical to apply on-farm has been challenging. Based on previously described protocols, we measured both cell-mediated immune response (Cell-IR) and antibody-mediated immune response (Ab-IR) and combined these measures to determine an animal's IC. Using a population of 2,853 Australian Angus steers and heifers, we compared 2 alternative methods to combine both metrics into a single phenotype to be used as a tool for the genetic improvement of IC. The first method, named ZMEAN, is obtained by taking the average of the individual metrics after subjecting each to a Z-score standardization. The second, ImmuneDEX (IDEX), is a weighted average that considers the correlation between Cell-IR and Ab-IR, as well as the difference in ranking of individuals by each metric, and uses these as weights in the averaging. Both simulation and real data were used to understand the behavior of ZMEAN and IDEX. To further ascertain the relationship between IDEX and other traits of economic importance, we evaluated a range of traits related to growth, feedlot performance, and carcass characteristics. We report estimates of heritability of 0.31 ± 0.06 for Cell-IR, 0.42 ± 0.06 for Ab-IR, 0.42 ± 0.06 for ZMEAN and 0.370 ± 0.06 for IDEX, as well as a unity genetic correlation (rg) between ZMEAN and IDEX. While a moderately positive rg was estimated between Cell-IR and Ab-IR (rg = 0.33 ± 0.12), strongly positive estimates were obtained between IDEX and Cell-IR (rg = 0.80 ± 0.05) and between IDEX and Ab-IR (rg = 0.85 ± 0.04). We obtained a moderately negative rg between IC traits and growth including an rg = -0.38 ± 0.14 between IDEX and weaning weight, and negligible with carcass fat measurements, including an rg = -0.03 ± 0.12 between IDEX and marbling. Given that breeding with a sole focus on production might inadvertently increase susceptibility to disease and associated antibiotic use, our analyses suggest that ImmuneDEX will provide a basis to breed animals that are both highly productive and with an enhanced ability to resist disease.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  beef cattle; heritability; immune competence; stress; weaning

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33677583      PMCID: PMC7936916          DOI: 10.1093/jas/skaa384

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  11 in total

Review 1.  Selection for high immune response: an alternative approach to animal health maintenance?

Authors:  B Wilkie; B Mallard
Journal:  Vet Immunol Immunopathol       Date:  1999-12-15       Impact factor: 2.046

2.  Short communication: Association of disease incidence and adaptive immune response in Holstein dairy cows.

Authors:  K A Thompson-Crispi; B Hine; M Quinton; F Miglior; B A Mallard
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.034

3.  Associations between immune competence, stress responsiveness, and production in Holstein-Friesian and Holstein-Friesian × Jersey heifers reared in a pasture-based production system in Australia.

Authors:  J W Aleri; B C Hine; M F Pyman; P D Mansell; W J Wales; B Mallard; M A Stevenson; A D Fisher
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 4.034

4.  Heritabilities and genetic correlations of pulmonary arterial pressure and performance traits in Angus cattle at high altitude.

Authors:  N F Crawford; M G Thomas; T N Holt; S E Speidel; R M Enns
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Prediction of ossification from live and carcass traits in young beef cattle: model development and evaluation.

Authors:  Boyd W Gudex; Malcolm J McPhee; Victor H Oddy; Brad J Walmsley
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Genetic and phenotypic associations of feed efficiency with growth and carcass traits in Australian Angus cattle.

Authors:  José Antonio Torres-Vázquez; Julius H J van der Werf; Samuel A Clark
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  Immune competence traits assessed during the stress of weaning are heritable and favorably genetically correlated with temperament traits in Angus cattle1.

Authors:  Brad C Hine; Amy M Bell; Dominic D O Niemeyer; Christian J Duff; Nick M Butcher; Sonja Dominik; Aaron B Ingham; Ian G Colditz
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 3.159

8.  Genetic and phenotypic relationships of feed intake and measures of efficiency with growth and carcass merit of beef cattle.

Authors:  J D Nkrumah; J A Basarab; Z Wang; C Li; M A Price; E K Okine; D H Crews; S S Moore
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2007-05-25       Impact factor: 3.159

9.  Heritability and genetic correlations of feed intake, body weight gain, residual gain, and residual feed intake of beef cattle as heifers and cows.

Authors:  Harvey C Freetly; Larry A Kuehn; Richard M Thallman; Warren M Snelling
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 3.159

10.  The Meat Standards Australia Index indicates beef carcass quality.

Authors:  P McGilchrist; R J Polkinghorne; A J Ball; J M Thompson
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.