Literature DB >> 33677449

Neurofeedback Training versus Treatment-as-Usual for Alcohol Dependence: Results of an Early-Phase Randomized Controlled Trial and Neuroimaging Correlates.

Leena Subramanian1, Leon Skottnik2, W Miles Cox3, Michael Lührs4,5, Rachel McNamara6, Kerry Hood6, Gareth Watson6, Joseph R Whittaker7, Angharad N Williams8, Raman Sakhuja9, Niklas Ihssen10, Rainer Goebel4,5, Rebecca Playle6, David E J Linden1,11.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Alcohol dependence is one of the most common substance use disorders, and novel treatment options are urgently needed. Neurofeedback training (NFT) based on real-time functional magnetic resonance imaging (rtf-MRI) has emerged as an attractive candidate for add-on treatments in psychiatry, but its use in alcohol dependence has not been formally investigated in a clinical trial. We investigated the use of rtfMRI-based NFT to prevent relapse in alcohol dependence.
METHODS: Fifty-two alcohol-dependent patients from the UK who had completed a detoxification program were randomly assigned to a treatment group (receiving rtfMRI NFT in addition to standard care) or the control group (receiving standard care only). At baseline, alcohol consumption was assessed as the primary outcome measure and a variety of psychological, behavioral, and neural parameters as secondary outcome measures to determine feasibility and secondary training effects. Participants in the treatment group underwent 6 NFT sessions over 4 months and were trained to downregulate their brain activation in the salience network in the presence of alcohol stimuli and to upregulate frontal activation in response to pictures related to positive goals. Four, 8, and 12 months after baseline assessment, both groups were followed up with a battery of clinical and psychometric tests.
RESULTS: Primary outcome measures showed very low relapse rates for both groups. Analysis of neural secondary outcome measures indicated that the majority of patients modulated the salience system in the desired directions, by decreasing activity in response to alcohol stimuli and increasing activation in response to positive goals. The intervention had a good safety and acceptability profile.
CONCLUSION: We demonstrated that rtfMRI-neurofeedback targeting hyperactivity of the salience network in response to alcohol cues is feasible in currently abstinent patients with alcohol dependence.
© 2021 The Author(s) Published by S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Addiction; Alcohol dependence; Neurofeedback; Real-time functional magnetic resonance imaging; Self-regulation

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33677449      PMCID: PMC8491491          DOI: 10.1159/000513448

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Addict Res        ISSN: 1022-6877            Impact factor:   3.015


  28 in total

1.  Differentiating heavy from light drinkers by neural responses to visual alcohol cues and other motivational stimuli.

Authors:  Niklas Ihssen; W Miles Cox; Alison Wiggett; Javad Salehi Fadardi; David E J Linden
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  The addiction-stroop test: Theoretical considerations and procedural recommendations.

Authors:  W Miles Cox; Javad Salehi Fadardi; Emmanuel M Pothos
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 17.737

3.  The respiration response function: the temporal dynamics of fMRI signal fluctuations related to changes in respiration.

Authors:  Rasmus M Birn; Monica A Smith; Tyler B Jones; Peter A Bandettini
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-12-15       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 4.  Neural substrates of cue reactivity: association with treatment outcomes and relapse.

Authors:  Kelly E Courtney; Joseph P Schacht; Kent Hutchison; Daniel J O Roche; Lara A Ray
Journal:  Addict Biol       Date:  2015-10-04       Impact factor: 4.280

5.  Effects of cognitive bias modification training on neural alcohol cue reactivity in alcohol dependence.

Authors:  Corinde E Wiers; Christine Stelzel; Thomas E Gladwin; Soyoung Q Park; Steffen Pawelczack; Christiane K Gawron; Heiner Stuke; Andreas Heinz; Reinout W Wiers; Mike Rinck; Johannes Lindenmeyer; Henrik Walter; Felix Bermpohl
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 18.112

6.  Real-time functional magnetic resonance imaging neurofeedback can reduce striatal cue-reactivity to alcohol stimuli.

Authors:  Martina Kirsch; Isabella Gruber; Matthias Ruf; Falk Kiefer; Peter Kirsch
Journal:  Addict Biol       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 4.280

Review 7.  Identifying the neural circuitry of alcohol craving and relapse vulnerability.

Authors:  Andreas Heinz; Anne Beck; Sabine M Grüsser; Anthony A Grace; Jana Wrase
Journal:  Addict Biol       Date:  2008-10-09       Impact factor: 4.280

Review 8.  Functional neuroimaging studies of alcohol cue reactivity: a quantitative meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  Joseph P Schacht; Raymond F Anton; Hugh Myrick
Journal:  Addict Biol       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 4.280

9.  Real-time FMRI neurofeedback training of amygdala activity in patients with major depressive disorder.

Authors:  Kymberly D Young; Vadim Zotev; Raquel Phillips; Masaya Misaki; Han Yuan; Wayne C Drevets; Jerzy Bodurka
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Real-time fMRI brain-computer interface: development of a "motivational feedback" subsystem for the regulation of visual cue reactivity.

Authors:  Moses O Sokunbi; David E J Linden; Isabelle Habes; Stephen Johnston; Niklas Ihssen
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 3.558

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Interoception and alcohol: Mechanisms, networks, and implications.

Authors:  Dennis F Lovelock; Ryan E Tyler; Joyce Besheer
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2021-09-23       Impact factor: 5.250

2.  A Randomized Controlled Trial of Attentional Control Training for Treating Alcohol Use Disorder.

Authors:  Angelina Isabella Mellentin; W Miles Cox; Javad S Fadardi; Laila Martinussen; Nicolaj Mistarz; Lotte Skøt; Kristine Rømer Thomsen; Kim Mathiasen; Mia Lichtenstein; Anette Søgaard Nielsen
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 4.157

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.