Pierantonio Menna1, Emanuela Salvatorelli2, Maria Ilaria Del Principe3, Salvatore Perrone4, Livio Pagano5, Francesco Marchesi6, Giorgio Minotti7,2. 1. Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Campus Bio-Medico University Hospital, Rome, Italy, p.menna@unicampus.it. 2. Department of Medicine and Center for Integrated Research, Drug Sciences, University Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy. 3. Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, Hematology, University Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy. 4. Hematology, Polo Universitario Pontino, S.M. Goretti Hospital, Latina, Italy. 5. Institute of Hematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli-IRCCS, Catholic University School of Medicine, Rome, Italy. 6. Hematology and Stem Cell Transplant Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy. 7. Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Campus Bio-Medico University Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Patients treated with midostaurin and chemotherapy are at risk of invasive fungal disease. Prophylactic posaconazole is recommended for these patients, but posaconazole strongly inhibits the CYP3A4 isozyme that metabolizes midostaurin. Posaconazole therefore introduces a risk of patient's overexposure to midostaurin. METHODS: Blood samples were obtained from 4 patients treated with midostaurin for newly diagnosed FLT3-mutAML. Patients had received a concomitant treatment with posaconazole, isavuconazole, or micafungin, respectively. All blood samples were drawn before daily dose administration of midostaurin. RESULTS: Posaconazole caused a ≥8-fold increase of midostaurin plasma levels at through, which was accompanied by a decreased plasma exposure to O-demethylated or hydroxylated midostaurin metabolites. We also show that hematologists react to risk perception by replacing posaco-nazole with antifungals like micafungin or isavuconazole, which lack a strong inhibition of CYP3A4 and fail to modify midostaurin pharmacokinetics but are not formally recommended in these settings. DISCUSSION: In real-life scenarios, concerns about CYP3A4 inhibition may outweigh compliance with recommendations. Large studies are needed to survey the risk:benefit of hematologist's decision to replace posaconazole with other antifungals.
INTRODUCTION:Patients treated with midostaurin and chemotherapy are at risk of invasive fungal disease. Prophylactic posaconazole is recommended for these patients, but posaconazole strongly inhibits the CYP3A4 isozyme that metabolizes midostaurin. Posaconazole therefore introduces a risk of patient's overexposure to midostaurin. METHODS: Blood samples were obtained from 4 patients treated with midostaurin for newly diagnosed FLT3-mutAML. Patients had received a concomitant treatment with posaconazole, isavuconazole, or micafungin, respectively. All blood samples were drawn before daily dose administration of midostaurin. RESULTS:Posaconazole caused a ≥8-fold increase of midostaurin plasma levels at through, which was accompanied by a decreased plasma exposure to O-demethylated or hydroxylated midostaurin metabolites. We also show that hematologists react to risk perception by replacing posaco-nazole with antifungals like micafungin or isavuconazole, which lack a strong inhibition of CYP3A4 and fail to modify midostaurin pharmacokinetics but are not formally recommended in these settings. DISCUSSION: In real-life scenarios, concerns about CYP3A4 inhibition may outweigh compliance with recommendations. Large studies are needed to survey the risk:benefit of hematologist's decision to replace posaconazole with other antifungals.