Literature DB >> 33677327

Close facial emotions enhance physiological responses and facilitate perceptual discrimination.

Audrey Dureux1, Elvio Blini2, Laura Clara Grandi3, Olena Bogdanova3, Clément Desoche4, Alessandro Farnè5, Fadila Hadj-Bouziane6.   

Abstract

Accumulating evidence indicates that the peripersonal space (PPS) constitutes a privileged area for efficient processing of proximal stimuli, allowing to flexibly adapt our behavior both to the physical and social environment. Whether and how behavioral and physiological signatures of PPS relate to each other in emotional contexts remains, though, elusive. Here, we addressed this question by having participants to discriminate male from female faces depicting different emotions (happiness, anger or neutral) and presented at different distances (50 cm-300 cm) while we measured the reaction time and accuracy of their responses, as well as pupillary diameter, heart rate and heart rate variability. Results showed facilitation of participants' performances (i.e., faster response time) when faces were presented close compared to far from the participants, even when controlling for retinal size across distances. These behavioral effects were accompanied by significant modulation of participants' physiological indexes when faces were presented in PPS. Interestingly, both PPS representation and physiological signals were affected by features of the seen faces such as the emotional valence, its sex and the participants' sex, revealing the profound impact of social context onto the autonomic state and behavior within PPS. Together, these findings suggest that both external and internal signals contribute in shaping PPS representation.
Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Discrimination; Emotion; Heart rate; Peripersonal space; Pupil diameter; Sex; Virtual reality

Year:  2021        PMID: 33677327     DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2021.01.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cortex        ISSN: 0010-9452            Impact factor:   4.027


  6 in total

1.  Touched by loneliness-how loneliness impacts the response to observed human touch: a tDCS study.

Authors:  Nira Saporta; Leehe Peled-Avron; Dirk Scheele; Jana Lieberz; René Hurlemann; Simone G Shamay-Tsoory
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  Driver's Visual Attention Characteristics and Their Emotional Influencing Mechanism under Different Cognitive Tasks.

Authors:  Yaqi Liu; Xiaoyuan Wang; Longfei Chen; Shijie Liu; Junyan Han; Huili Shi; Fusheng Zhong
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 4.614

3.  Simulated proximity enhances perceptual and physiological responses to emotional facial expressions.

Authors:  Olena V Bogdanova; Volodymyr B Bogdanov; Luke E Miller; Fadila Hadj-Bouziane
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Personal space regulation is affected by unilateral temporal lesions beyond the amygdala.

Authors:  Audrey Dureux; Luca Zigiotto; Silvio Sarubbo; Clément Desoche; Alessandro Farnè; Nadia Bolognini; Fadila Hadj-Bouziane
Journal:  Cereb Cortex Commun       Date:  2022-07-22

5.  Pupil size as a robust marker of attentional bias toward nicotine-related stimuli in smokers.

Authors:  Elvio Blini; Marco Zorzi
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2022-10-13

Review 6.  Parietal maps of visual signals for bodily action planning.

Authors:  Guy A Orban; Alessia Sepe; Luca Bonini
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2021-09-10       Impact factor: 3.270

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.