Damien Kiernan1. 1. Movement Analysis Laboratory, Central Remedial Clinic, Clontarf, Dublin 3, Ireland; Trinity Centre for Biomedical Engineering, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland. Electronic address: dkiernan@crc.ie.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Trunk control during gait in children with cerebral palsy (CP) is known to be impaired. While differentiation of trunk movement between CP subtypes (unilateral/bilateral) has been examined, differentiation of lower lumbar spinal loading has not been considered. Furthermore, the relationship between lower lumbar loading and lower limb pathology has not been reported. RESEARCH QUESTION: How do lower lumbar spinal kinetics differ during unilateral and bilateral CP gait and what is the relationship between trunk kinematics and L5/S1 kinetics with lower limb pathology? METHODS: Three-dimensional thorax kinematics and L5/S1 kinetics were measured during gait with children divided into 3 groups (unilateral CP (n = 21), bilateral CP (n = 31) and typical development (TD) (n = 26)). Differences in thorax kinematics and reactive forces and moments at L5/S1 between groups were analysed using Statistical Parametric Mapping. Correlation coefficients were calculated between Gait Profile Score (GPS) and kinematic measures of the thorax and kinetics at L5/S1. RESULTS: An increased ipsilateral bending moment was present for unilateral CP in the coronal plane (55-70% Gait Cycle (GC), p < 0.001), while children with bilateral CP demonstrated two distinct increased peaks during mid-stance (10-30 % GC, p < 0.001) and mid-swing (60-80% GC, p = 0.004) compared to TD. RMS and RoM thorax flexion, side flexion and L5/S1 lateral bend moment demonstrated significant moderate correlations with GPS. SIGNIFICANCE: This study confirmed an increased involvement at the trunk and of lower lumbar spinal loading for children with bilateral CP compared to unilateral CP. It has been suggested that altered trunk movement in CP gait may be a combination of both a compensation for lower limb pathology and an underlying deficit. Our result of positive yet moderate correlations between GPS and trunk movement and lower spinal loading support this theory.
BACKGROUND: Trunk control during gait in children with cerebral palsy (CP) is known to be impaired. While differentiation of trunk movement between CP subtypes (unilateral/bilateral) has been examined, differentiation of lower lumbar spinal loading has not been considered. Furthermore, the relationship between lower lumbar loading and lower limb pathology has not been reported. RESEARCH QUESTION: How do lower lumbar spinal kinetics differ during unilateral and bilateral CP gait and what is the relationship between trunk kinematics and L5/S1 kinetics with lower limb pathology? METHODS: Three-dimensional thorax kinematics and L5/S1 kinetics were measured during gait with children divided into 3 groups (unilateral CP (n = 21), bilateral CP (n = 31) and typical development (TD) (n = 26)). Differences in thorax kinematics and reactive forces and moments at L5/S1 between groups were analysed using Statistical Parametric Mapping. Correlation coefficients were calculated between Gait Profile Score (GPS) and kinematic measures of the thorax and kinetics at L5/S1. RESULTS: An increased ipsilateral bending moment was present for unilateral CP in the coronal plane (55-70% Gait Cycle (GC), p < 0.001), while children with bilateral CP demonstrated two distinct increased peaks during mid-stance (10-30 % GC, p < 0.001) and mid-swing (60-80% GC, p = 0.004) compared to TD. RMS and RoM thorax flexion, side flexion and L5/S1 lateral bend moment demonstrated significant moderate correlations with GPS. SIGNIFICANCE: This study confirmed an increased involvement at the trunk and of lower lumbar spinal loading for children with bilateral CP compared to unilateral CP. It has been suggested that altered trunk movement in CP gait may be a combination of both a compensation for lower limb pathology and an underlying deficit. Our result of positive yet moderate correlations between GPS and trunk movement and lower spinal loading support this theory.
Authors: Stefanos Tsitlakidis; Nicholas A Beckmann; Sebastian I Wolf; Sébastien Hagmann; Tobias Renkawitz; Marco Götze Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-05-02 Impact factor: 4.964
Authors: Stefanos Tsitlakidis; Sarah Campos; Nicholas A Beckmann; Sebastian I Wolf; Sébastien Hagmann; Tobias Renkawitz; Marco Götze Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-08-17 Impact factor: 4.964