Literature DB >> 33676747

A chemical prioritization process: Applications to contaminants of emerging concern in freshwater ecosystems (Phase I).

Jessica R Deere1, Summer Streets2, Mark D Jankowski3, Mark Ferrey4, Yvette Chenaux-Ibrahim5, Matteo Convertino6, E J Isaac7, Nicholas B D Phelps8, Alexander Primus9, Joseph L Servadio10, Randall S Singer11, Dominic A Travis12, Seth Moore13, Tiffany M Wolf14.   

Abstract

Contaminants of emerging concern (CECs), such as pharmaceuticals, personal care products, and hormones, are frequently found in aquatic ecosystems around the world. Information on sublethal effects from exposure to commonly detected concentrations of CECs is lacking and the limited availability of toxicity data makes it difficult to interpret the biological significance of occurrence data. However, the ability to evaluate the effects of CECs on aquatic ecosystems is growing in importance, as detection frequency increases. The goal of this study was to prioritize the chemical hazards of 117 CECs detected in subsistence species and freshwater ecosystems on the Grand Portage Indian Reservation and adjacent 1854 Ceded Territory in Minnesota, USA. To prioritize CECs for management actions, we adapted Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's Aquatic Toxicity Profiles framework, a tool for the rapid assessment of contaminants to cause adverse effects on aquatic life by incorporating chemical-specific information. This study aimed to 1) perform a rapid-screening assessment and prioritization of detected CECs based on their potential environmental hazard; 2) identify waterbodies in the study region that contain high priority CECs; and 3) inform future monitoring, assessment, and potential remediation in the study region. In water samples alone, 50 CECs were deemed high priority. Twenty-one CECs were high priority among sediment samples and seven CECs were high priority in fish samples. Azithromycin, DEET, diphenhydramine, fluoxetine, miconazole, and verapamil were high priority in all three media. Due to the presence of high priority CECs throughout the study region, we recommend future monitoring of particular CECs based on the prioritization method used here. We present an application of a chemical hazard prioritization process and identify areas where the framework may be adapted to meet the objectives of other management-related assessments.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aquatic toxicity profiles; Chemicals of emerging concern; Hazard identification; Hazard ranking; Indigenous peoples; Pollutants

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33676747      PMCID: PMC9255259          DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   10.753


  53 in total

1.  Pharmaceuticals and personal care products found in the Great Lakes above concentrations of environmental concern.

Authors:  Benjamin D Blair; Jordan P Crago; Curtis J Hedman; Rebecca D Klaper
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2013-08-23       Impact factor: 7.086

Review 2.  Ecotoxicological aspects related to the presence of pharmaceuticals in the aquatic environment.

Authors:  Lúcia H M L M Santos; A N Araújo; Adriano Fachini; A Pena; C Delerue-Matos; M C B S M Montenegro
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2009-10-30       Impact factor: 10.588

3.  Use of the bioaccumulation factor to screen chemicals for bioaccumulation potential.

Authors:  Jed Costanza; David G Lynch; Robert S Boethling; Jon A Arnot
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 3.742

Review 4.  Antibiotic resistance genes identified in wastewater treatment plant systems - A review.

Authors:  Magdalena Pazda; Jolanta Kumirska; Piotr Stepnowski; Ewa Mulkiewicz
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 7.963

5.  Pharmaceuticals and other anthropogenic tracers in surface water: a randomized survey of 50 Minnesota lakes.

Authors:  Mark L Ferrey; Steven Heiskary; Richard Grace; M Coreen Hamilton; April Lueck
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 3.742

6.  Fluoxetine exposure impacts boldness in female Siamese fighting fish, Betta splendens.

Authors:  Teresa L Dzieweczynski; Jessica L Kane; Brennah A Campbell; Lindsey E Lavin
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.823

7.  Effects of the antihistamine diphenhydramine on selected aquatic organisms.

Authors:  Jason P Berninger; Bowen Du; Kristin A Connors; Stephanie A Eytcheson; Mark A Kolkmeier; Krista N Prosser; Theodore W Valenti; C Kevin Chambliss; Bryan W Brooks
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 3.742

8.  Waterborne pharmaceutical uptake and toxicity is modified by pH and dissolved organic carbon in zebrafish.

Authors:  Derek Alsop; Joanna Y Wilson
Journal:  Aquat Toxicol       Date:  2019-02-14       Impact factor: 4.964

9.  Toxicities of 48 pharmaceuticals and their freshwater and marine environmental assessment in northwestern France.

Authors:  Laetitia Minguez; Julie Pedelucq; Emilie Farcy; Céline Ballandonne; Hélène Budzinski; Marie-Pierre Halm-Lemeille
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 4.223

10.  Influence of salinity and pH on bioconcentration of ionizable pharmaceuticals by the gulf killifish, Fundulus grandis.

Authors:  W Casan Scott; Samuel P Haddad; Gavin N Saari; C Kevin Chambliss; Jeremy L Conkle; Cole W Matson; Bryan W Brooks
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 7.086

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.