Literature DB >> 33676538

A novel approach to increasing community capacity for weight management a volunteer-delivered programme (ActWELL) initiated within breast screening clinics: a randomised controlled trial.

Annie S Anderson1, Huey Yi Chong2, Angela M Craigie3, Peter T Donnan4, Stephanie Gallant3, Amy Hickman5, Chloe McAdam6, Jennifer McKell7, Paul McNamee2, E Jane Macaskill8, Nanette Mutrie6, Ronan E O'Carroll9, Petra Rauchhaus10, Naveed Sattar11, Martine Stead7, Shaun Treweek12.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is estimated that around 30% of breast cancers in post-menopausal women are related to lifestyle. The breast cancer-pooling project demonstrated that sustained weight loss of 2 to 4.5 kg is associated with an 18% lower risk of breast cancer, highlighting the importance of small changes in body weight. Our study aimed to assess the effectiveness a volunteer-delivered, community based, weight management programme (ActWELL) for women with a BMI > 25 kg/m2 attending NHS Scotland Breast Screening clinics.
METHODS: A multicentre, 1:1 parallel group, randomised controlled trial was undertaken in 560 women aged 50 to 70 years with BMI > 25 kg/m2. On completion of baseline measures, all participants received a breast cancer prevention leaflet. Intervention group participants received the ActWELL intervention which focussed on personalised diet advice and pedometer walking plans. The programme was delivered in leisure centres by (the charity) Breast Cancer Now volunteer coaches. Primary outcomes were changes between groups at 12 months in body weight (kg) and physical activity (accelerometer measured step count).
RESULTS: Two hundred seventy-nine women were allocated to the intervention group and 281 to the comparison group. Twelve-month data were available from 240 (81%) intervention and 227 (85%) comparison group participants. Coaches delivered 523 coaching sessions and 1915 support calls to 279 intervention participants. Mean weight change was - 2.5 kg (95% CI - 3.1 to - 1.9) in the intervention group and - 1.2 kg (- 1.8 to 0.6) in the comparison group. The adjusted mean difference was - 1.3 kg (95% CI - 2.2 to - 0.4, P = 0.003). The odds ratio for losing 5% weight was 2.20 (95% CI 1.4 to 3.4, p = 0.0005) in favour of the intervention. The adjusted mean difference in step counts between groups was 483 steps/day (95% CI - 635 to 1602) (NS).
CONCLUSIONS: A community weight management intervention initiated at breast screening clinics and delivered by volunteer coaches doubled the likelihood of clinically significant weight loss at 12 months (compared with usual care) offering significant potential to decrease breast cancer risk. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Database of registration: ISCRTN. Registration number: 11057518 . Date trial registered:21.07.2017. Date of enrolment of first participant: 01.09.2017.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer body weight lifestyle; Cost-effectiveness analysis; Intervention screening; Physical activity

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33676538      PMCID: PMC7936444          DOI: 10.1186/s12966-021-01099-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act        ISSN: 1479-5868            Impact factor:   6.457


  9 in total

1.  Measuring height and weight as part of routine mammographic screening for breast cancer.

Authors:  Ellie Darcey; Ravi Ambati; Helen Lund; Andrew Redfern; Christobel Saunders; Sandra Thompson; Elizabeth Wylie; Jennifer Stone
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 2.136

2.  The £ for lb. Challenge. Evaluation of a novel, workplace-based peer-led weight management programme, 2014-2016.

Authors:  Damien Bennett; Tracy Owen; D T Bradley
Journal:  Public Health       Date:  2017-06-26       Impact factor: 2.427

Review 3.  The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions.

Authors:  Susan Michie; Maartje M van Stralen; Robert West
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2011-04-23       Impact factor: 7.327

Review 4.  How many steps/day are enough? For adults.

Authors:  Catrine Tudor-Locke; Cora L Craig; Wendy J Brown; Stacy A Clemes; Katrien De Cocker; Billie Giles-Corti; Yoshiro Hatano; Shigeru Inoue; Sandra M Matsudo; Nanette Mutrie; Jean-Michel Oppert; David A Rowe; Michael D Schmidt; Grant M Schofield; John C Spence; Pedro J Teixeira; Mark A Tully; Steven N Blair
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 6.457

5.  Acceptability of receiving lifestyle advice at cervical, breast and bowel cancer screening.

Authors:  Claire Stevens; Charlotte Vrinten; Samuel G Smith; Jo Waller; Rebecca J Beeken
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 4.018

6.  Intentional Weight Loss and Obesity-Related Cancer Risk.

Authors:  Juhua Luo; Michael Hendryx; JoAnn E Manson; Jane C Figueiredo; Erin S LeBlanc; Wendy Barrington; Thomas E Rohan; Barbara V Howard; Kerryn Reding; Gloria Yf Ho; David O Garcia; Rowan T Chlebowski
Journal:  JNCI Cancer Spectr       Date:  2019-08-09

7.  A Context-Specific Digital Alcohol Brief Intervention in Symptomatic Breast Clinics (Abreast of Health): Development and Usability Study.

Authors:  Julia M A Sinclair; Peter F Dutey-Magni; Annie S Anderson; Janis Baird; Mary E Barker; Ramsey I Cutress; Eileen F S Kaner; Mark McCann; Caspian K Priest; Ellen R Copson
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2020-01-24

8.  Training veterans to provide peer support in a weight-management program: MOVE!

Authors:  Marlyn Allicock; Lindsey Haynes-Maslow; Carol Carr; Melinda Orr; Leila C Kahwati; Bryan J Weiner; Linda Kinsinger
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 2.830

9.  Determinants of willingness to receive healthy lifestyle advice in the context of cancer screening.

Authors:  Claire Stevens; Charlotte Vrinten; Samuel G Smith; Jo Waller; Rebecca J Beeken
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 7.640

  9 in total
  4 in total

1.  Correction to: A novel approach to increasing community capacity for weight management a volunteer-delivered programme (ActWELL) initiated within breast screening clinics: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Annie S Anderson; Huey Yi Chong; Angela M Craigie; Peter T Donnan; Stephanie Gallant; Amy Hickman; Chloe McAdam; Jennifer McKell; Paul McNamee; E Jane Macaskill; Nanette Mutrie; Ronan E O'Carroll; Petra Rauchhaus; Naveed Sattar; Martine Stead; Shaun Treweek
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 6.457

2.  Effectiveness of physical activity monitors in adults: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rasmus Tolstrup Larsen; Vibeke Wagner; Christoffer Bruun Korfitsen; Camilla Keller; Carsten Bogh Juhl; Henning Langberg; Jan Christensen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2022-01-26

3.  Trial Forge Guidance 3: randomised trials and how to recruit and retain individuals from ethnic minority groups-practical guidance to support better practice.

Authors:  Shoba Dawson; Katie Banister; Katie Biggs; Seonaidh Cotton; Declan Devane; Heidi Gardner; Katie Gillies; Gosala Gopalakrishnan; Talia Isaacs; Kamlesh Khunti; Alistair Nichol; Adwoa Parker; Amy M Russell; Victoria Shepherd; Frances Shiely; Gillian Shorter; Bella Starling; Hywel Williams; Andrew Willis; Miles D Witham; Shaun Treweek
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 2.728

4.  Letter on "Sharing trial results directly with trial participants and other stakeholders after the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic hit the UK - experience from the ActWELL trial".

Authors:  Hanne Bruhn; Annie S Anderson; Amy Hickman; E Jane Macaskill; Shaun Treweek
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2021-06-05       Impact factor: 2.279

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.