Literature DB >> 33676496

Embedding an economist in regional and rural health services to add value and reduce waste by improving local-level decision-making: protocol for the 'embedded Economist' program and evaluation.

Andrew Searles1, Donella Piper2, Christine Jorm3,4, Penny Reeves5, Maree Gleeson6, Jonathan Karnon7, Nicholas Goodwin8, Kenny Lawson5, Rick Iedema9, Jane Gray10.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Systematic approaches to the inclusion of economic evaluation in national healthcare decision-making are usual. It is less common for economic evaluation to be routinely undertaken at the 'local-level' (e.g. in a health service or hospital) despite the largest proportion of health care expenditure being determined at this service level and recognition by local health service decision makers of the need for capacity building in economic evaluation skills. This paper describes a novel program - the embedded Economist (eE) Program. The eE Program aims to increase local health service staff awareness of, and develop their capacity to access and apply, economic evaluation principles in decision making. The eE program evaluation is also described. The aim of the evaluation is to capture the contextual, procedural and relational aspects that assist and detract from the eE program aims; as well as the outcomes and impact from the specific eE projects.
METHODS: The eE Program consists of a embedding a health economist in six health services and the provision of supported education in applied economic evaluation, provided via a community of practice and a university course. The embedded approach is grounded in co-production, embedded researchers and 'slow science'. The sites, participants, and program design are described. The program evaluation includes qualitative data collection via surveys, semi-structured interviews, observations and field diaries. In order to share interim findings, data are collected and analysed prior, during and after implementation of the eE program, at each of the six health service sites. The surveys will be analysed by calculating frequencies and descriptive statistics. A thematic analysis will be conducted on interview, observation and filed diary data. The Framework to Assess the Impact from Translational health research (FAIT) is utilised to assess the overall impact of the eE Program. DISCUSSION: This program and evaluation will contribute to knowledge about how best to build capacity and skills in economic evaluation amongst decision-makers working in local-level health services. It will examine the extent to which participants are able to improve their ability to utilise evidence to inform decisions, avoid waste and improve the value of care delivery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Economic evaluation; Embedded researcher; Health economics; Health services research; Measuring impact; Program evaluation; Value-based healthcare

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33676496      PMCID: PMC7936595          DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-06181-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res        ISSN: 1472-6963            Impact factor:   2.655


  31 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review of the use of economic evaluation in local decision-making.

Authors:  Oya Eddama; Joanna Coast
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  2008-01-14       Impact factor: 2.980

2.  The PBS in a globalised world: free trade and reference pricing.

Authors:  Andrew Searles
Journal:  Aust Health Rev       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.990

Review 3.  Economic evaluation to inform health care decision-making: promise, pitfalls and a proposal for an alternative path.

Authors:  Astrid Brousselle; Chantale Lessard
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2011-02-03       Impact factor: 4.634

4.  Economics and resourcing of complex healthcare systems.

Authors:  Abdolvahab Baghbanian; Ghazal Torkfar
Journal:  Aust Health Rev       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.990

Review 5.  Quality improvement through clinical communities: eight lessons for practice.

Authors:  Emma-Louise Aveling; Graham Martin; Natalie Armstrong; Jay Banerjee; Mary Dixon-Woods
Journal:  J Health Organ Manag       Date:  2012

6.  Building the capacity - examining the impact of evidence-based public health trainings in Europe: a mixed methods approach.

Authors:  Natalicio Serrano; Gunter Diem; Vilius Grabauskas; Aushra Shatchkute; Sylvie Stachenko; Anjali Deshpande; Kathleen N Gillespie; Elizabeth A Baker; Erkki Vartinaien; Ross C Brownson
Journal:  Glob Health Promot       Date:  2019-04-03

7.  Performing Economic Evaluation of Integrated Care: Highway to Hell or Stairway to Heaven?

Authors:  Apostolos Tsiachristas; K Viktoria Stein; Silvia Evers; Maureen Rutten-van Mölken
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 5.120

8.  Understanding and Evaluating the Implementation of Integrated Care: A 'Three Pipe' Problem.

Authors:  Nick Goodwin
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2016-12-31       Impact factor: 5.120

9.  Strengthening and measuring research impact in global health: lessons from applying the FAIT framework.

Authors:  Rebecca Dodd; Shanthi Ramanathan; Blake Angell; David Peiris; Rohina Joshi; Andrew Searles; Jacqui Webster
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2019-05-06

10.  An approach to measuring and encouraging research translation and research impact.

Authors:  Andrew Searles; Chris Doran; John Attia; Darryl Knight; John Wiggers; Simon Deeming; Joerg Mattes; Brad Webb; Steve Hannan; Rod Ling; Kim Edmunds; Penny Reeves; Michael Nilsson
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2016-08-09
View more
  2 in total

1.  Relational aspects of building capacity in economic evaluation in an Australian Primary Health Network using an embedded researcher approach.

Authors:  Donella Piper; Christine Jorm; Rick Iedema; Nicholas Goodwin; Andrew Searles; Lisa McFayden
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 2.908

2.  When Health Systems Consider Research to Be Beyond the Scope of Healthcare Delivery, Research Translation Is Crippled Comment on "Academic Health Science Centres as Vehicles for Knowledge Mobilisation in Australia? A Qualitative Study".

Authors:  Christine Jorm; Donella Piper
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2022-06-01
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.