Guney Isa Burak1, Sonmezler Ozge2, Mujde Cem2, Buyukdereli Gulgun1, Dogruca Yapar Zeynep1, Bisgin Atil3. 1. Cukurova University Faculty of Medicine Nuclear Medicine Department of Balcali Hospital and Clinics, Adana, Turkey. 2. Cukurova University AGENTEM (Adana Genetic Diseases Diagnosis and Treatment Center), Adana, Turkey. 3. Cukurova University AGENTEM & Cukurova University Faculty of Medicine Medical Genetics Department of Balcali Hospital and Clinics, Adana, Turkey. abisgin@yahoo.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) arise from hormone-producing or nervous system cells and can develop from anywhere in the body. They have heterogeneous origins from skin to gastrointestinal track and a complicated histology. Thus, there is an inevitable need for genomic profiling to determine the exact genetics of each tumour for prognosis and treatment strategies to overcome the disease's complexity. For this purpose, next-generation-sequencing (NGS) is the most reliable methodology for both germ-line and somatic studies to make a clinical diagnosis. In this study, we analyse liquid biopsies, formalin fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) tissues, and peripheral blood samples for their ability to provide information for actionability. METHODS: A customized multi-gene panel comprised of Succinate Dehydrogenase Complex Iron Sulfur Subunit B (SDHB), Succinate Dehydrogenase Complex Subunit C (SDHC), Cell Division Cycle 73(CDC73), Calcium Sensing Receptor (CASR), Platelet Derived Growth Factor Receptor Alpha (PDGFRA), Succinate Dehydrogenase Complex Flavoprotein Subunit A (SDHA), Ret Proto-Oncogene (RET), Succinate Dehydrogenase Complex Assembly Factor 2(SDHAF2), Menin 1(MEN1), Succinate Dehydrogenase Complex Subunit D (SDHD), MYC Associated Factor X (MAX) and Protein Kinase CAMP-Dependent Type I Regulatory Subunit Alpha (PRKAR1A) genes was constructed to assess multiple specimen types including: 3 liquid biopsies, 6 FFPE tissues, and 26 peripheral blood samples from 35 unique NET patients. Quality-control and bioinformatics analyses were performed using QCI-Analyze and QCI-Interpret. RESULTS: The three liquid biopsies and the 6 FFPE tissue samples were evaluated for somatic mutations; while the 26 peripheral blood samples were analysed using the germ-line pipeline. Five (55.6%) of the nine patients that were studied for somatic changes carried actionable mutations related to therapy sensitivities. Through the germ-line studies, we observed a 50% positivity rate for disease predisposition with 16 variants classified according to ACMG (American College of Medical Genetics) Standards and Guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: Genomic profiling medicine is an emerging area of clinical oncology and has become crucial for disease and patient management by providing a precision approach; this is especially true for rare diseases including rare cancers such as NETs. Notably, this study emphasized the relevance of multiple distinctive biological sample types for use in the genetic testing of cancers to help with the choice of therapy to maximize the likelihood of a positive clinical outcome.
BACKGROUND:Neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) arise from hormone-producing or nervous system cells and can develop from anywhere in the body. They have heterogeneous origins from skin to gastrointestinal track and a complicated histology. Thus, there is an inevitable need for genomic profiling to determine the exact genetics of each tumour for prognosis and treatment strategies to overcome the disease's complexity. For this purpose, next-generation-sequencing (NGS) is the most reliable methodology for both germ-line and somatic studies to make a clinical diagnosis. In this study, we analyse liquid biopsies, formalin fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) tissues, and peripheral blood samples for their ability to provide information for actionability. METHODS: A customized multi-gene panel comprised of Succinate Dehydrogenase Complex Iron Sulfur Subunit B (SDHB), Succinate Dehydrogenase Complex Subunit C (SDHC), Cell Division Cycle 73(CDC73), Calcium Sensing Receptor (CASR), Platelet Derived Growth Factor Receptor Alpha (PDGFRA), Succinate Dehydrogenase Complex Flavoprotein Subunit A (SDHA), Ret Proto-Oncogene (RET), Succinate Dehydrogenase Complex Assembly Factor 2(SDHAF2), Menin 1(MEN1), Succinate Dehydrogenase Complex Subunit D (SDHD), MYC Associated Factor X (MAX) and Protein Kinase CAMP-Dependent Type I Regulatory Subunit Alpha (PRKAR1A) genes was constructed to assess multiple specimen types including: 3 liquid biopsies, 6 FFPE tissues, and 26 peripheral blood samples from 35 unique NET patients. Quality-control and bioinformatics analyses were performed using QCI-Analyze and QCI-Interpret. RESULTS: The three liquid biopsies and the 6 FFPE tissue samples were evaluated for somatic mutations; while the 26 peripheral blood samples were analysed using the germ-line pipeline. Five (55.6%) of the nine patients that were studied for somatic changes carried actionable mutations related to therapy sensitivities. Through the germ-line studies, we observed a 50% positivity rate for disease predisposition with 16 variants classified according to ACMG (American College of Medical Genetics) Standards and Guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: Genomic profiling medicine is an emerging area of clinical oncology and has become crucial for disease and patient management by providing a precision approach; this is especially true for rare diseases including rare cancers such as NETs. Notably, this study emphasized the relevance of multiple distinctive biological sample types for use in the genetic testing of cancers to help with the choice of therapy to maximize the likelihood of a positive clinical outcome.
Authors: Thomas Knösel; Yuan Chen; Annelore Altendorf-Hofmann; Christine Danielczok; Martin Freesmeyer; Utz Settmacher; Christine Wurst; Stefan Schulz; Lin Lin Yang; Iver Petersen Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2011-12-08 Impact factor: 4.553
Authors: Gilbert J Cote; Caitlin Evers; Mimi I Hu; Elizabeth G Grubbs; Michelle D Williams; Tao Hai; Dzifa Y Duose; Michal R Houston; Jacquelin H Bui; Meenakshi Mehrotra; Steven G Waguespack; Naifa L Busaidy; Maria E Cabanillas; Mouhammed Amir Habra; Rajyalakshmi Luthra; Steven I Sherman Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2017-09-01 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Namrata Vijayvergia; Patrick M Boland; Elizabeth Handorf; Karen S Gustafson; Yulan Gong; Harry S Cooper; Fathima Sheriff; Igor Astsaturov; Steven J Cohen; Paul F Engstrom Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2016-08-02 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Guido Rindi; David S Klimstra; Behnoush Abedi-Ardekani; Sylvia L Asa; Frederik T Bosman; Elisabeth Brambilla; Klaus J Busam; Ronald R de Krijger; Manfred Dietel; Adel K El-Naggar; Lynnette Fernandez-Cuesta; Günter Klöppel; W Glenn McCluggage; Holger Moch; Hiroko Ohgaki; Emad A Rakha; Nicholas S Reed; Brian A Rous; Hironobu Sasano; Aldo Scarpa; Jean-Yves Scoazec; William D Travis; Giovanni Tallini; Jacqueline Trouillas; J Han van Krieken; Ian A Cree Journal: Mod Pathol Date: 2018-08-23 Impact factor: 7.842
Authors: Elisabetta Cavalcanti; Antonia Ignazzi; Francesco De Michele; Maria Lucia Caruso Journal: Cancer Biol Ther Date: 2018-10-22 Impact factor: 4.742
Authors: Angela Lamarca; Melissa Frizziero; Jorge Barriuso; Zainul Kapacee; Wasat Mansoor; Mairéad G McNamara; Richard A Hubner; Juan W Valle Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2022-02-17 Impact factor: 6.639