Literature DB >> 33676412

The effect of socioeconomic status on informal caregiving for parents among adult married females: evidence from China.

Yi Wang1, Jiajia Li1, Lulu Ding1, Yuejing Feng1, Xue Tang1, Long Sun1, Chengchao Zhou2,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Married female caregivers face a higher risk of an informal care burden than other caregivers. No study has explored the effect of socioeconomic status (SES) on the intensity of informal care provided by married female caregivers in China. The purpose of this study is to empirically examine how the SES of married female caregivers affects the intensity of the informal care they provide for their parents/parents-in-law in China.
METHODS: The data for this study were drawn from 8 waves of the China Health and Nutrition Survey (CHNS). The respondents were married women whose parents/parents-in-law needed care and lived in the same city as them. SES was defined based on four indicators: education, economic status, employment status, and hukou (China's household registration system). Informal caregivers were divided into three categories: non-caregivers (0 h/week), low-intensity caregivers (less than 10 h/week), and high-intensity caregivers (10 h/week and above). Multinomial logistic regression analysis was used to examine the relation between SES and the likelihood of a low- and high-intensity caregiving among married female caregivers, adjusting for age, family characteristics and survey wave.
RESULTS: Of the 2661 respondents, high-intensity and low-intensity caregivers accounted for 16.35 and 21.27%, respectively. The multinomial logistic regression results showed that the likelihood of being a high-intensity caregiver versus (vs. a non-caregiver) increased as the caregiver's educational attainment increased (p < 0.05), and that high economic status was related to the likelihood of being a high-intensity caregiver, but this relationship was only significant at the 10% level. Urban females were 1.34 times more likely than their rural counterparts to provide low-intensity care vs. no care (p < 0.05) and were 1.33 times more likely to provide high-intensity care vs. no care (p < 0.05). Employed females were 1.25 times more likely than those unemployed females to provide low-intensity care vs. no care (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Differences in SES were found between high-intensity caregivers and low-intensity caregivers. Women with high educational attainment and urban hukou were more likely to provide high-intensity informal care, and women who were employed and had urban hukou were more likely to provide low-intensity care.

Entities:  

Keywords:  China; Informal caregiving; Married females; Socioeconomic status

Year:  2021        PMID: 33676412      PMCID: PMC7937217          DOI: 10.1186/s12877-021-02094-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Geriatr        ISSN: 1471-2318            Impact factor:   3.921


  25 in total

Review 1.  Urban-rural comparisons of outcomes for informal carers of elderly people in the community: a systematic review.

Authors:  Samantha J McKenzie; Deirdre McLaughlin; Annette J Dobson; Julie E Byles
Journal:  Maturitas       Date:  2010-07-03       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Caregiving intensity and retirement status in Canada.

Authors:  Josephine C Jacobs; Audrey Laporte; Courtney H Van Houtven; Peter C Coyte
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  Informal Care and Labor Market Outcomes: Evidence From Chinese Married Women.

Authors:  Lu Chen; Na Zhao; Hongli Fan; Peter C Coyte
Journal:  Res Aging       Date:  2016-08-03

4.  Volunteers and Informal Caregivers' Contributions and Collaboration with Formal Caregivers in Norwegian Long-term Care.

Authors:  Marianne Sundlisæter Skinner; Håkon Lorentzen; Laila Tingvold; Oddrunn Sortland; Nina Beate Andfossen; Magnus Jegermalm
Journal:  J Aging Soc Policy       Date:  2020-04-06

5.  Rural-urban disparities in unmet long-term care needs in China: The role of the hukou status.

Authors:  Yumei Zhu; August Österle
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 4.634

6.  The socioeconomic within-gender gap in informal caregiving among middle-aged women: Evidence from a Japanese nationwide survey.

Authors:  Mutsumi Tokunaga; Hideki Hashimoto
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 4.634

7.  Sociodemographic Disparities in Adult Child Informal Caregiving Intensity in the United States: Results from the New National Study of Caregiving.

Authors:  Sarah K Cook; Steven A Cohen
Journal:  J Gerontol Nurs       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 1.254

8.  Social Support and Self-Rated Health of African American Women Informal Caregivers: Urban and Rural Differences.

Authors:  Philip A Rozario; Gaynell M Simpson
Journal:  J Gerontol Soc Work       Date:  2017-11-21

9.  Cost and burden of informal caregiving of dependent older people in a rural Indian community.

Authors:  Ethel M Brinda; Anto P Rajkumar; Ulrika Enemark; Jørn Attermann; K S Jacob
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Informal Caregiving, Chronic Physical Conditions, and Physical Multimorbidity in 48 Low- and Middle-Income Countries.

Authors:  Louis Jacob; Hans Oh; Jae Il Shin; Josep Maria Haro; Davy Vancampfort; Brendon Stubbs; Sarah E Jackson; Lee Smith; Ai Koyanagi
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 6.053

View more
  2 in total

1.  Intergenerational support and subjective wellbeing among oldest-old in China: the moderating role of economic status.

Authors:  Fanghong Huang; Peipei Fu
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 3.921

2.  Spousal Care Intensity, Socioeconomic Status, and Depression among the Older Caregivers in China: A Study on 2011-2018 CHARLS Panel Data.

Authors:  Jun Ma; Hongyan Yang; Wenxiu Hu; Hafiz T A Khan
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-26
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.