Literature DB >> 33675631

Efficacy and safety of EMA401 in peripheral neuropathic pain: results of 2 randomised, double-blind, phase 2 studies in patients with postherpetic neuralgia and painful diabetic neuropathy.

Andrew S C Rice1, Robert H Dworkin, Nanna B Finnerup, Nadine Attal, Praveen Anand, Roy Freeman, Alessandro Piaia, Francesca Callegari, Christie Doerr, Subhayan Mondal, Nisha Narayanan, Laurent Ecochard, Yanina Flossbach, Shaloo Pandhi.   

Abstract

ABSTRACT: The analgesic efficacy and safety of 2 phase 2b studies of EMA401 (a highly selective angiotensin II type 2 receptor antagonist) in patients with postherpetic neuralgia (EMPHENE) and painful diabetic neuropathy (EMPADINE) were reported. These were multicentre, randomised, double-blind treatment studies conducted in participants with postherpetic neuralgia or type I/II diabetes mellitus with painful distal symmetrical sensorimotor neuropathy. Participants were randomised 1:1:1 to either placebo, EMA401 25 mg, or 100 mg twice daily (b.i.d) in the EMPHENE and 1:1 to placebo or EMA401 100 mg b.i.d. in the EMPADINE. The primary outcome for both the studies was change in weekly mean of the 24-hour average pain score, using a numeric rating scale from baseline to week 12. Both the studies were prematurely terminated due to preclinical hepatotoxicity on long-term dosing, although not observed in these studies. Out of the planned participants, a total of 129/360 (EMPHENE) and 137/400 (EMPADINE) participants were enrolled. The least square mean reduction in numeric rating scale pain score was numerically in favour of EMA401 100 mg arm in both EMPHENE (treatment difference: -0.5 [95% confidence interval: -1.6 to 0.6; P value: 0.35]) and EMPADINE (treatment difference: -0.6 [95% confidence interval: -1.4 to 0.1; P value: 0.10]) at the end of week 12. However, as the studies were terminated prematurely, no firm conclusion could be drawn but the consistent clinical improvement in pain intensity reduction across these 2 studies in 2 different populations is worth noting.
Copyright © 2021 International Association for the Study of Pain.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33675631     DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002252

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  3 in total

Review 1.  The Angiotensin AT2 Receptor: From a Binding Site to a Novel Therapeutic Target.

Authors:  U Muscha Steckelings; Robert E Widdop; Edward D Sturrock; Lizelle Lubbe; Tahir Hussain; Elena Kaschina; Thomas Unger; Anders Hallberg; Robert M Carey; Colin Sumners
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2022-10       Impact factor: 18.923

Review 2.  Pharmacotherapy of Painful Diabetic Neuropathy: A Clinical Update.

Authors:  Cornelius Fernandez James; Shiva Tripathi; Kyriaki Karampatou; Divya V Gladston; Joseph M Pappachan
Journal:  Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul       Date:  2022-03-28

3.  Discovery and Optimization of Highly Potent and Selective AT2R Antagonists to Relieve Peripheral Neuropathic Pain.

Authors:  Yanghui Guo; Xiangui Huang; Weiwei Liao; Lichen Meng; Daiwang Xu; Cheng Ye; Lei Chen; Taishan Hu
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2021-05-28
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.