BACKGROUND: High-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) with TI-CE regimen is a valid option for the treatment of relapsed advanced germ cell tumors (GCT). We report a phase II trial with therapeutic drug monitoring of carboplatin for optimizing area under the curve (AUC) of this drug. METHODS: Patients with unfavorable relapsed GCT were treated according to TI-CE regimen: two cycles combining paclitaxel and ifosfamide followed by three cycles of HD carboplatin plus etoposide administered on 3 days. Carboplatin dose was adapted on day 3 based on carboplatin clearance (CL) at day 1 in order to reach a target AUC of 24 mg.min/mL per cycle. The primary endpoint was the complete response (CR) rate. RESULTS: Eighty-nine patients who received HDCT were included in the modified intent-to-treat (mITT) analysis. Measured mean AUC was 24.4 mg.min/mL per cycle (22.4 and 26.8 mg.min/mL for 10th and 90th percentiles). Thirty-five (44.3%) patients achieved a CR with or without surgery of residual masses and 20 patients achieved a partial response with negative tumor markers. With a median follow-up of 44 months (m), median PFS was 12.3 m (95% CI: 7.5-25.9) and OS was 46.3 m (95% CI: 18.6-not reached). For high- and very high-risk patients, according to the International Prognostic Score at first relapse or treated after at least one salvage treatment (n = 51), 2-year PFS rate was 41.1%. CONCLUSION: The rates of complete and favorable responses were clinically relevant in this very poor risk population. Individual monitoring of carboplatin plasma concentration permitted to control more accurately the target AUC and avoided both underexposure and overexposure to the drug.
BACKGROUND: High-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) with TI-CE regimen is a valid option for the treatment of relapsed advanced germ cell tumors (GCT). We report a phase II trial with therapeutic drug monitoring of carboplatin for optimizing area under the curve (AUC) of this drug. METHODS:Patients with unfavorable relapsed GCT were treated according to TI-CE regimen: two cycles combining paclitaxel and ifosfamide followed by three cycles of HDcarboplatin plus etoposide administered on 3 days. Carboplatin dose was adapted on day 3 based on carboplatin clearance (CL) at day 1 in order to reach a target AUC of 24 mg.min/mL per cycle. The primary endpoint was the complete response (CR) rate. RESULTS: Eighty-nine patients who received HDCT were included in the modified intent-to-treat (mITT) analysis. Measured mean AUC was 24.4 mg.min/mL per cycle (22.4 and 26.8 mg.min/mL for 10th and 90th percentiles). Thirty-five (44.3%) patients achieved a CR with or without surgery of residual masses and 20 patients achieved a partial response with negative tumor markers. With a median follow-up of 44 months (m), median PFS was 12.3 m (95% CI: 7.5-25.9) and OS was 46.3 m (95% CI: 18.6-not reached). For high- and very high-risk patients, according to the International Prognostic Score at first relapse or treated after at least one salvage treatment (n = 51), 2-year PFS rate was 41.1%. CONCLUSION: The rates of complete and favorable responses were clinically relevant in this very poor risk population. Individual monitoring of carboplatin plasma concentration permitted to control more accurately the target AUC and avoided both underexposure and overexposure to the drug.
Authors: A F LeRoy; M L Wehling; H L Sponseller; W S Friauf; R E Solomon; R L Dedrick; C L Litterst; T E Gram; A M Guarino; D A Becker Journal: Biochem Med Date: 1977-10
Authors: R J Motzer; M Mazumdar; J Sheinfeld; D F Bajorin; H A Macapinlac; M Bains; L Reich; C Flombaum; T Mariani; W P Tong; G J Bosl Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2000-03 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Darren R Feldman; Joel Sheinfeld; Dean F Bajorin; Patricia Fischer; Stefan Turkula; Nicole Ishill; Sujata Patil; Manjit Bains; Lilian M Reich; George J Bosl; Robert J Motzer Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-03-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Anja Lorch; Jörg Beyer; Caroline Bascoul-Mollevi; Andrew Kramar; Lawrence H Einhorn; Andrea Necchi; Christophe Massard; Ugo De Giorgi; Aude Fléchon; Kim A Margolin; Jean-Pierre Lotz; Jose Ramon Germa Lluch; Thomas Powles; Christian K Kollmannsberger Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-10-18 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: F Selle; S Wittnebel; P Biron; G Gravis; G Roubaud; B N Bui; R Delva; J O Bay; A Fléchon; L Geoffrois; A Caty; D G Soares; T de Revel; K Fizazi; J Gligorov; J M Micléa; C Dubot; S Provent; I Temby; M Gaulet; E Horn; I Brindel; J P Lotz Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2014-06-03 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: S D Fosså; S P Stenning; A Gerl; A Horwich; P I Clark; P M Wilkinson; W G Jones; M V Williams; R T Oliver; E S Newlands; G M Mead; M H Cullen; S B Kaye; G J Rustin; P A Cook Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 1999-07 Impact factor: 7.640