Literature DB >> 33674886

Myeloma Response Assessment and Diagnosis System (MY-RADS): strategies for practice implementation.

Michael E Mulligan1.   

Abstract

Structured reporting systems have been developed for many organ systems and disease processes beginning with BI-RADS in 1993. Numerous reports indicate that referring health care providers prefer structured reports. Reducing variability of reports from one radiologist to another helps referring physician and patient confidence. Changing radiologists practice habits from completely free text to structured reports can be met with some resistance, but most radiologists quickly find that structured reports make their job easier. Whole-body MR studies are recommended as first-line imaging, by the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG), for all patients with suspected diagnosis of asymptomatic myeloma and/or initial diagnosis of solitary plasmacytoma. Whole-body MR imaging (WBMRI) has been shown to have equal or greater sensitivity and specificity compared to PET/CT for detection of bone marrow involvement. Changing to WBMRI from other imaging modalities can be difficult for referring providers. Patient acceptance is high. MY-RADS is for myeloma patients who have WBMRI studies done. The intent of the system is to promote uniformity in MR imaging acquisition, diagnostic criteria, and response assessment and to diminish differences in the subsequent interpretation and reporting. A secondary benefit is a report template that provides a guide for interpretation for radiologists who may not have previously dictated these difficult studies. The characterization of bone marrow abnormalities in myeloma patients usually is fairly straightforward. To date, there is no standardized scoring or risk stratification of abnormalities nor is there an imaging atlas of abnormalities.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MY-RADS; Myeloma; Structured reporting; Whole-body MRI

Year:  2021        PMID: 33674886     DOI: 10.1007/s00256-021-03755-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Skeletal Radiol        ISSN: 0364-2348            Impact factor:   2.199


  18 in total

1.  Radiology reports: examining radiologist and clinician preferences regarding style and content.

Authors:  S S Naik; A Hanbidge; S R Wilson
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Structured report compliance: effect on audio dictation time, report length, and total radiologist study time.

Authors:  Tarek N Hanna; Haris Shekhani; Kiran Maddu; Chao Zhang; Zhengjia Chen; Jamlik-Omari Johnson
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2016-06-25

3.  MRI versus 18F-FDG-PET/CT for detecting bone marrow involvement in multiple myeloma: diagnostic performance and clinical relevance.

Authors:  Frédéric E Lecouvet; Dimitar Boyadzhiev; Laurence Collette; Maude Berckmans; Nicolas Michoux; Perrine Triqueneaux; Vassiliki Pasoglou; François Jamar; Marie-Christiane Vekemans
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Investigating cancer patient acceptance of Whole Body MRI.

Authors:  Serena Oliveri; Paola Pricolo; Silvia Pizzoli; Flavia Faccio; Valentina Lampis; Paul Summers; Giuseppe Petralia; Gabriella Pravettoni
Journal:  Clin Imaging       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 1.605

5.  Interpreting the interpretations: the use of structured reporting improves referring clinicians' comprehension of coronary CT angiography reports.

Authors:  Brian B Ghoshhajra; Ashley M Lee; Maros Ferencik; Sammy Elmariah; Ronan J P Margey; Oyere Onuma; Marcello Panagia; Suhny Abbara; Udo Hoffmann
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 5.532

6.  Application of (18)F-FDG PET and diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) in multiple myeloma: comparison of functional imaging modalities.

Authors:  Christos Sachpekidis; Jennifer Mosebach; Martin T Freitag; Thomas Wilhelm; Elias K Mai; Hartmut Goldschmidt; Uwe Haberkorn; Heinz-Peter Schlemmer; Stefan Delorme; Antonia Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-10-12

7.  Assessing myeloma bone disease with whole-body diffusion-weighted imaging: comparison with x-ray skeletal survey by region and relationship with laboratory estimates of disease burden.

Authors:  S L Giles; N M deSouza; D J Collins; V A Morgan; S West; F E Davies; G J Morgan; C Messiou
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 2.350

8.  Redefining the structure of structured reporting in radiology.

Authors:  J Martijn Nobel; Ellen M Kok; Simon G F Robben
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2020-02-04

9.  Guidelines for Acquisition, Interpretation, and Reporting of Whole-Body MRI in Myeloma: Myeloma Response Assessment and Diagnosis System (MY-RADS).

Authors:  Christina Messiou; Jens Hillengass; Stefan Delorme; Frédéric E Lecouvet; Lia A Moulopoulos; David J Collins; Matthew D Blackledge; Niels Abildgaard; Brian Østergaard; Heinz-Peter Schlemmer; Ola Landgren; Jon Thor Asmussen; Martin F Kaiser; Anwar Padhani
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  2 in total

1.  FDG PET-MRI evaluation of synchronous gallbladder adenocarcinoma and POEMS syndrome.

Authors:  Fatemeh Ataei; Akash Sharma; Rupert Stanborough; Ephraim E Parent
Journal:  Radiol Case Rep       Date:  2022-09-13

2.  Myeloma Spine and Bone Damage Score (MSBDS) on Whole-Body Computed Tomography (WBCT): Multiple Reader Agreement in a Multicenter Reliability Study.

Authors:  Alberto Stefano Tagliafico; Clarissa Valle; Pietro Andrea Bonaffini; Ali Attieh; Matteo Bauckneht; Liliana Belgioia; Bianca Bignotti; Nicole Brunetti; Alessandro Bonsignore; Enrico Capaccio; Sara De Giorgis; Alessandro Garlaschi; Silvia Morbelli; Federica Rossi; Lorenzo Torri; Simone Caprioli; Simona Tosto; Michele Cea; Alida Dominietto
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-04
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.