Literature DB >> 33674328

Multisite medical record review of emergency department visits for unspecified injury of head following the ICD-10-CM coding transition.

Alexis Peterson1, Barbara A Gabella2, Jewell Johnson2, Beth Hume3, Ann Liu4, Julia F Costich5, Jeanne Hathaway6, Svetla Slavova7, Renee Johnson8, Matt Breiding8.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: In 2016, a proposed International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Edition, Clinical Modification surveillance definition for traumatic brain injury (TBI) morbidity was introduced that excluded the unspecified injury of head (S09.90) diagnosis code. This study assessed emergency department (ED) medical records containing S09.90 for evidence of TBI based on medical documentation.
METHODS: State health department representatives in Maryland, Kentucky, Colorado and Massachusetts reviewed a target of 385 randomly sampled ED records uniquely assigned the S09.90 diagnosis code (without proposed TBI codes), which were initial medical encounters among state residents discharged home during October 2015-December 2018. Using standardised abstraction procedures, reviewers recorded signs and symptoms of TBI, and head imaging results. A tiered case confirmation strategy was applied that assigned a level of certainty (high, medium, low, none) to each record based on the number and type of symptoms and imaging results present in the record. Positive predictive value (PPV) of S09.90 by level of TBI certainty was calculated by state.
RESULTS: Wide variation in PPV of sampled ED records assigned S09.90: 36%-52% had medium or high evidence of TBI, while 48%-64% contained low or no evidence of a TBI. Loss of consciousness was mentioned in 8%-24% of sampled medical records. DISCUSSION: Exclusion of the S09.90 code in surveillance estimates may result in many missed TBI cases; inclusion may result in counting many false positives. Further, missed TBI cases influenced by incidence estimates, based on the TBI surveillance definition, may lead to inadequate allocation of public health resources. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  epidemiology; surveillance; traumatic brain injury

Year:  2021        PMID: 33674328     DOI: 10.1136/injuryprev-2019-043517

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Inj Prev        ISSN: 1353-8047            Impact factor:   2.399


  3 in total

1.  Non-fatal injury data: characteristics to consider for surveillance and research.

Authors:  Andrea E Carmichael; Michael F Ballesteros; Judith R Qualters; Karin A Mack
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 3.770

2.  Multi-site medical record review for validation of intentional self-harm coding in emergency departments.

Authors:  Barbara A Gabella; Beth Hume; Linda Li; Marianne Mabida; Julia Costich
Journal:  Inj Epidemiol       Date:  2022-06-07

3.  Practitioners Assess Achievements and Challenges of Nonfatal Injury Surveillance.

Authors:  Julia F Costich; Sarah C Vos; Dana B Quesinberry
Journal:  J Public Health Manag Pract       Date:  2022 May-Jun 01
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.