Literature DB >> 3367407

Chemical burns.

D W Mozingo1, A A Smith, W F McManus, B A Pruitt, A D Mason.   

Abstract

In chemical skin injuries, reduction of the time of exposure to the causative agent and recognition of systemic toxicity are necessary to lessen the severity of the insult, reduce morbidity, and maximize survival. During a 17-year period (1969 through 1985), 87 (2.1%) of the 4,212 burned patients admitted to the U.S. Army Institute of Surgical Research sustained chemical burns. Twelve of 87 patients died (13.8%). White phosphorous, the most common causative agent, produced cutaneous injury in 49 patients. Acids (13 patients), alkalies (ten patients), and organic solvents (five patients) were the other common causes of injury. Initial treatment consisted of water lavage. Later wound management was carried out with topical antibiotic therapy and excision and grafting as necessary. Systemic toxicity due to phenol, nitrate, and formate absorption occurred, as did acute tubular necrosis following copper sulfate treatment of white phosphorus burns. Inhalation injury occurred in five patients. A decrease in hospital stay for chemically injured patients was observed. To minimize chemical injury, clothing should be removed promptly and water lavage begun. Systemic toxicity and inhalation injury are rare but often severe and increase mortality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3367407     DOI: 10.1097/00005373-198805000-00014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma        ISSN: 0022-5282


  10 in total

1.  [Management of dermatologic industrial accidents. Skin burns by bitumen as an example].

Authors:  T Burchardt; T Assmann; K W Schulte; T Ruzicka; N J Neumann
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2003-03-07       Impact factor: 0.751

2.  Severe chemical burn leaving an irredeemable scar because of unskilled chemical peel at an oriental medicine clinic.

Authors:  Hye Sung Han; Guk Jin Jeong; Ji Yeon Hong; Beom Joon Kim
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 3.  Paediatric chemical burns: a clinical review.

Authors:  Alexander T M Nguyen; Kira Chamberlain; Andrew J A Holland
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 3.183

Review 4.  Burn wound infections.

Authors:  Deirdre Church; Sameer Elsayed; Owen Reid; Brent Winston; Robert Lindsay
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 5.  Interventions for treating phosphorus burns.

Authors:  Loai Barqouni; Nafiz Abu Shaaban; Khamis Elessi
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-06-04

6.  Occupational chemical burns: a 2-year experience in the emergency department.

Authors:  Panagiotis Touzopoulos; Paul Zarogoulidis; Alexandros Mitrakas; Michael Karanikas; Panagiotis Milothridis; Dimitrios Matthaios; Ioannis Kouroumichakis; Stella Proikaki; Paschalis Pavlioglou; Nikolaos Katsikogiannis; Theodoros C Constantinidis
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2011-10-03

7.  A case of chemical assault in Hong Kong (case report).

Authors:  B C Leung; A Burd
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2015-04-04

8.  Decreasing incidence of cutaneous chemical burns in a resource limited burn centre: is this a positive effect of modernization?

Authors:  R E E Nnabuko; C P Okoye; I S Ogbonnaya; Egi Isiwele
Journal:  Burns Trauma       Date:  2017-03-07

9.  A fatal case of multi-organ failure in acute yellow phosphorus poisoning.

Authors:  Jai Prakash Soni; Pankaj Suresh Ghormade; Swapnil Akhade; Krishnadutt Chavali; Bedanta Sarma
Journal:  Autops Case Rep       Date:  2020-01-30

10.  The Epidemiology of Chemical Burns Among the Patients Referred to Burn Centers in Shiraz, Southern Iran, 2008-2018.

Authors:  Hosein Abbasi; Ali Dehghani; Ali Akbar Mohammadi; Tayyeb Ghadimi; Abdolkhalegh Keshavarzi
Journal:  Bull Emerg Trauma       Date:  2021-10
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.