Eugenia Oviedo-Joekes1,2, Scott MacDonald3, Charles Boissonneault4, Kelli Harper3. 1. School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, 2206 East Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada. eugenia@cheos.ubc.ca. 2. Centre for Health Evaluation & Outcome Sciences, Providence Health Care, St. Paul's Hospital, 575- 1081 Burrard St, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 1Y6, Canada. eugenia@cheos.ubc.ca. 3. Providence Health Care, Providence Crosstown Clinic, 84 West Hastings Street, Vancouver, BC, V6B 1G6, Canada. 4. British Columbia Centre on Substance Use, BC Centre on Substance Use (BCCSU), 400-1045 Howe St, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 2A9, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In North America the opioid poisoning crisis currently faces the unprecedented challenges brought by the COVID-19 pandemic, further straining people and communities already facing structural and individual vulnerabilities. People with opioid use disorder (OUD) are facing unique challenges in response to COVID-19, such as not being able to adopt best practices (e.g., physical distancing) if they're financially insecure or living in shelters (or homeless). They also have other medical conditions that make them more likely to be immunocompromised and at risk of developing COVID-19. In response to the COVID-19 public health emergency, national and provincial regulatory bodies introduced guidance and exemptions to mitigate the spread of the virus. Among them, clinical guidance for prescribers were issued to allow take home opioid medications for opioid agonist treatment (OAT). Take Home for injectable opioid agonist treatment (iOAT) is only considered within a restrictive regulatory structure, specific to the pandemic. Nevertheless, this risk mitigation guidance allowed carries, mostly daily dispensed, to a population that would not have access to it prior to the pandemic. In this case it is presented and discussed that if a carry was possible during the pandemic, then the carry could continue post COVID-19 to address a gap in our approach to individualize care for people with OUD receiving iOAT. CASE PRESENTATION: Here we present the first case of a patient in Canada with long-term OUD that received take home injectable diacetylmorphine to self-isolate in an approved site after being diagnosed with COVID-19 during a visit to the emergency room where he was diagnosed with cellulitis and admitted to receive antibiotics. CONCLUSION: In the present case we demonstrated that it is feasible to provide iOAT outside the community clinic with no apparent negative consequences. Improving upon and making permanent these recently introduced risk mitigating guidance during COVID-19, have the potential not just to protect during the pandemic, but also to address long-overdue barriers to access evidence-based care in addiction treatment.
BACKGROUND: In North America the opioid poisoning crisis currently faces the unprecedented challenges brought by the COVID-19 pandemic, further straining people and communities already facing structural and individual vulnerabilities. People with opioid use disorder (OUD) are facing unique challenges in response to COVID-19, such as not being able to adopt best practices (e.g., physical distancing) if they're financially insecure or living in shelters (or homeless). They also have other medical conditions that make them more likely to be immunocompromised and at risk of developing COVID-19. In response to the COVID-19 public health emergency, national and provincial regulatory bodies introduced guidance and exemptions to mitigate the spread of the virus. Among them, clinical guidance for prescribers were issued to allow take home opioid medications for opioid agonist treatment (OAT). Take Home for injectable opioid agonist treatment (iOAT) is only considered within a restrictive regulatory structure, specific to the pandemic. Nevertheless, this risk mitigation guidance allowed carries, mostly daily dispensed, to a population that would not have access to it prior to the pandemic. In this case it is presented and discussed that if a carry was possible during the pandemic, then the carry could continue post COVID-19 to address a gap in our approach to individualize care for people with OUD receiving iOAT. CASE PRESENTATION: Here we present the first case of a patient in Canada with long-term OUD that received take home injectable diacetylmorphine to self-isolate in an approved site after being diagnosed with COVID-19 during a visit to the emergency room where he was diagnosed with cellulitis and admitted to receive antibiotics. CONCLUSION: In the present case we demonstrated that it is feasible to provide iOAT outside the community clinic with no apparent negative consequences. Improving upon and making permanent these recently introduced risk mitigating guidance during COVID-19, have the potential not just to protect during the pandemic, but also to address long-overdue barriers to access evidence-based care in addiction treatment.
Entities:
Keywords:
Diacetylmorphine; Direct observed treatment; Injectable opioid agonist treatment; Opioid use disorder; Patient centered care; Take home doses
Authors: Jens Reimer; Nat Wright; Lorenzo Somaini; Carlos Roncero; Icro Maremmani; Neil McKeganey; Richard Littlewood; Peter Krajci; Hannu Alho; Oscar D'Agnone Journal: Eur Addict Res Date: 2015-10-02 Impact factor: 3.015
Authors: Nat Wright; Oscar D'Agnone; Peter Krajci; Richard Littlewood; Hannu Alho; Jens Reimer; Carlos Roncero; Lorenzo Somaini; Icro Maremmani Journal: J Public Health (Oxf) Date: 2015-10-27 Impact factor: 2.341
Authors: Eugenia Oviedo-Joekes; Suzanne Brissette; Scott MacDonald; Daphne Guh; Kirsten Marchand; Salima Jutha; Scott Harrison; Amin Janmohamed; Derek Z Zhang; Aslam H Anis; Michael Krausz; David C Marsh; Martin T Schechter Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2017-05-10 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Sunggeun Ethan Park; Colleen M Grogan; Jennifer E Mosley; Keith Humphreys; Harold A Pollack; Peter D Friedmann Journal: Psychiatr Serv Date: 2019-09-10 Impact factor: 3.084
Authors: Eugenia Oviedo-Joekes; Daphne Guh; Suzanne Brissette; Kirsten Marchand; Scott MacDonald; Kurt Lock; Scott Harrison; Amin Janmohamed; Aslam H Anis; Michael Krausz; David C Marsh; Martin T Schechter Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2016-05-01 Impact factor: 21.596
Authors: Maximilian Meyer; Jean N Westenberg; Johannes Strasser; Kenneth M Dürsteler; Undine E Lang; Michael Krausz; Marc Vogel Journal: Harm Reduct J Date: 2022-06-07
Authors: Divane de Vargas; Caroline Figueira Pereira; Rosa Jacinto Volpato; Ana Vitória Corrêa Lima; Rogério da Silva Ferreira; Sheila Ramos de Oliveira; Thiago Faustino Aguilar Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-11-18 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Pouya Azar; Jean N Westenberg; Martha J Ignaszewski; James S H Wong; George Isac; Nickie Mathew; R Michael Krausz Journal: Addict Sci Clin Pract Date: 2022-04-05