Anthony W Gilbert1,2, Gregory Booth3, Tony Betts3, Andy Goldberg4,5,6. 1. Therapies Department, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, UK. anthony.gilbert@nhs.net. 2. School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK. anthony.gilbert@nhs.net. 3. Therapies Department, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, UK. 4. Institute of Orthopaedics and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University College London, London, UK. 5. Trauma and Orthopaedics Department, Wellington Hospital, London, UK. 6. MSK Lab, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To explore orthopaedic and musculoskeletal clinicians' views and experiences of legal, safety, safeguarding and security issues regarding the use of virtual consultations (VC) during the COVID-19 pandemic. A secondary objective was to suggest ways to overcome these issues. METHODS: A mixed method cross-sectional survey was conducted, seeking the views and experiences of orthopaedic and musculoskeletal medically qualified and Allied Health Professionals in the United Kingdom. Descriptive statistical analysis was employed for quantitative data and a qualitative content analysis undertaken for qualitative data. Findings were presented in accordance with the four key issues. RESULTS: Two hundred and ninety professionals (206 physiotherapists, 78 medically qualified professionals, 6 'other' therapists) participated in the survey. Of the 290 participants, 260 (90%) were not using VC prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, 248 respondents (86%) were unsure whether their professional indemnity insurance covered VC, 136 (47%) had considered how they would handle an issue of safeguarding whilst the remainder had not, 126 (43%) had considered what they would do if, during a virtual consultation, a patient suffered an injury (e.g. bang on their head) or a fall (e.g. mechanical or a medical event like syncope) and 158 (54%) reported they felt the current technological solutions are secure in terms of patient data. Qualitative data provided additional context to support the quantitative findings such as validity of indemnification, accuracy of diagnosis and consent using VC, safeguarding issues; and security and sharing of data. Potential changes to practice have been proposed to address these issues. CONCLUSIONS: VC have been rapidly deployed since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic often without clear guidance or consensus on many important issues. This study identified legal, safeguarding, safety and security issues. There is an urgent need to address these and develop local and national guidance and frameworks to facilitate ongoing safe virtual orthopaedic practice beyond the COVID-19 pandemic.
OBJECTIVE: To explore orthopaedic and musculoskeletal clinicians' views and experiences of legal, safety, safeguarding and security issues regarding the use of virtual consultations (VC) during the COVID-19 pandemic. A secondary objective was to suggest ways to overcome these issues. METHODS: A mixed method cross-sectional survey was conducted, seeking the views and experiences of orthopaedic and musculoskeletal medically qualified and Allied Health Professionals in the United Kingdom. Descriptive statistical analysis was employed for quantitative data and a qualitative content analysis undertaken for qualitative data. Findings were presented in accordance with the four key issues. RESULTS: Two hundred and ninety professionals (206 physiotherapists, 78 medically qualified professionals, 6 'other' therapists) participated in the survey. Of the 290 participants, 260 (90%) were not using VC prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, 248 respondents (86%) were unsure whether their professional indemnity insurance covered VC, 136 (47%) had considered how they would handle an issue of safeguarding whilst the remainder had not, 126 (43%) had considered what they would do if, during a virtual consultation, a patient suffered an injury (e.g. bang on their head) or a fall (e.g. mechanical or a medical event like syncope) and 158 (54%) reported they felt the current technological solutions are secure in terms of patient data. Qualitative data provided additional context to support the quantitative findings such as validity of indemnification, accuracy of diagnosis and consent using VC, safeguarding issues; and security and sharing of data. Potential changes to practice have been proposed to address these issues. CONCLUSIONS:VC have been rapidly deployed since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic often without clear guidance or consensus on many important issues. This study identified legal, safeguarding, safety and security issues. There is an urgent need to address these and develop local and national guidance and frameworks to facilitate ongoing safe virtual orthopaedic practice beyond the COVID-19 pandemic.
Authors: K M Jordan; N K Arden; M Doherty; B Bannwarth; J W J Bijlsma; P Dieppe; K Gunther; H Hauselmann; G Herrero-Beaumont; P Kaklamanis; S Lohmander; B Leeb; M Lequesne; B Mazieres; E Martin-Mola; K Pavelka; A Pendleton; L Punzi; U Serni; B Swoboda; G Verbruggen; I Zimmerman-Gorska; M Dougados Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2003-12 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: Rogelio A Coronado; Charles W Gay; Joel E Bialosky; Giselle D Carnaby; Mark D Bishop; Steven Z George Journal: J Electromyogr Kinesiol Date: 2012-01-30 Impact factor: 2.368
Authors: Michelle A Cottrell; Olivia A Galea; Shaun P O'Leary; Anne J Hill; Trevor G Russell Journal: Clin Rehabil Date: 2016-05-02 Impact factor: 3.477
Authors: Donna Gillies; Maria A Christou; Andrew C Dixon; Oliver J Featherston; Iro Rapti; Alicia Garcia-Anguita; Miguel Villasis-Keever; Pratibha Reebye; Evangelos Christou; Nagat Al Kabir; Panagiota A Christou Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2018-08-21 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: Kim L Bennell; Rachel Nelligan; Fiona Dobson; Christine Rini; Francis Keefe; Jessica Kasza; Simon French; Christina Bryant; Andrew Dalwood; J Haxby Abbott; Rana S Hinman Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2017-02-21 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Giovanni Trisolino; Renato Maria Toniolo; Lorenza Marengo; Daniela Dibello; Pasquale Guida; Elena Panuccio; Andrea Evangelista; Stefano Stallone; Maria Lucia Sansò; Carlo Amati; Pier Francesco Costici; Silvio Boero; Pasquale Farsetti; Nando De Sanctis; Fabio Verdoni; Antonio Memeo; Cosimo Gigante Journal: Children (Basel) Date: 2021-06-22