Literature DB >> 33673700

Surface Topography of Titanium Affects Their Osteogenic Potential through DNA Methylation.

Young-Dan Cho1, Woo-Jin Kim2, Sungtae Kim1, Young Ku1, Hyun-Mo Ryoo2.   

Abstract

It is widely accepted that sandblasted/large-grit/acid-etched (SLA) surfaces of titanium (Ti) have a higher osteogenic potential than machined ones. However, most studies focused on differential gene expression without elucidating the underlying mechanism for this difference. The aim of this study was to evaluate how the surface roughness of dental Ti implants affects their osteogenic potential. Mouse preosteoblast MC3T3-E1 cells were seeded on machined and SLA Ti discs. The cellular activities of the discs were analyzed using confocal laser scanning microscopy, proliferation assays, and real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). DNA methylation was evaluated using a methylation-specific PCR. The cell morphology was slightly different between the two types of surfaces. While cellular proliferation was slightly greater on the machined surfaces, the osteogenic response of the SLA surfaces was superior, and they showed increased alkaline phosphatase (Alp) activity and higher bone marker gene expression levels (Type I collagen, Alp, and osteocalcin). The degree of DNA methylation on the Alp gene was lower on the SLA surfaces than on the machined surfaces. DNA methyltransferase inhibitor stimulated the Alp gene expression on the machined surfaces, similar to the SLA surfaces. The superior osteogenic potential of the SLA surfaces can be attributed to a different epigenetic landscape, specifically, the DNA methylation of Alp genes. This finding offers novel insights into epigenetics to supplement genetics and raises the possibility of using epidrugs as potential therapeutic targets to enhance osteogenesis on implant surfaces.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA methylation; epigenetics; gene expression; osteoblast differentiation; surface topography

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33673700      PMCID: PMC7957554          DOI: 10.3390/ijms22052406

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Mol Sci        ISSN: 1422-0067            Impact factor:   5.923


  49 in total

Review 1.  Epigenetics and the environment: emerging patterns and implications.

Authors:  Robert Feil; Mario F Fraga
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 53.242

2.  Direct Gingival Fibroblast/Osteoblast Transdifferentiation via Epigenetics.

Authors:  Y Cho; B Kim; H Bae; W Kim; J Baek; K Woo; G Lee; Y Seol; Y Lee; Y Ku; I Rhyu; H Ryoo
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 6.116

3.  Effects of implant surface microtopography on osteoblast gene expression.

Authors:  Chihiro Masaki; Galen B Schneider; Rebecca Zaharias; Denise Seabold; Clark Stanford
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.977

4.  Epigenetic modifications and canonical wingless/int-1 class (WNT) signaling enable trans-differentiation of nonosteogenic cells into osteoblasts.

Authors:  Young-Dan Cho; Won-Joon Yoon; Woo-Jin Kim; Kyung-Mi Woo; Jeong-Hwa Baek; Gene Lee; Young Ku; Andre J van Wijnen; Hyun-Mo Ryoo
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Osteogenic responses to zirconia with hydroxyapatite coating by aerosol deposition.

Authors:  Y Cho; J Hong; H Ryoo; D Kim; J Park; J Han
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 6.116

6.  Histone acetylation together with DNA demethylation empowers higher plasticity in adipocytes to differentiate into osteoblasts.

Authors:  Young-Dan Cho; Bong-Su Kim; Woo-Jin Kim; Hyun-Jung Kim; Jeong-Hwa Baek; Kyung-Mi Woo; Yang-Jo Seol; Young Ku; Hyun-Mo Ryoo
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 3.688

7.  Control of CpNpG DNA methylation by the KRYPTONITE histone H3 methyltransferase.

Authors:  James P Jackson; Anders M Lindroth; Xiaofeng Cao; Steven E Jacobsen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-03-17       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 8.  A review on the wettability of dental implant surfaces II: Biological and clinical aspects.

Authors:  Rolando A Gittens; Lutz Scheideler; Frank Rupp; Sharon L Hyzy; Jürgen Geis-Gerstorfer; Zvi Schwartz; Barbara D Boyan
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2014-04-05       Impact factor: 8.947

9.  The effect of hydrofluoric acid treatment of titanium surface on nanostructural and chemical changes and the growth of MC3T3-E1 cells.

Authors:  Sébastien F Lamolle; Marta Monjo; Marina Rubert; Håvard J Haugen; Ståle P Lyngstadaas; Jan E Ellingsen
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2008-11-20       Impact factor: 12.479

10.  Comparison of the osteogenic potential of titanium- and modified zirconia-based bioceramics.

Authors:  Young-Dan Cho; Ji-Cheol Shin; Hye-Lee Kim; Myagmar Gerelmaa; Hyung-In Yoon; Hyun-Mo Ryoo; Dae-Joon Kim; Jung-Suk Han
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 5.923

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Role of chitosan in titanium coatings. trends and new generations of coatings.

Authors:  Nansi López-Valverde; Javier Aragoneses; Antonio López-Valverde; Cinthia Rodríguez; Bruno Macedo de Sousa; Juan Manuel Aragoneses
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-07-22
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.