Literature DB >> 3367283

The recognition of threatening facial stimuli.

J Aronoff1, A M Barclay, L A Stevenson.   

Abstract

Two studies examined the information that defines a threatening facial display. The first study identified those facial characteristics that distinguish between representations of threatening and nonthreatening facial displays. Masks that presented either threatening or nonthreatening facial displays were obtained from a number of non-Western cultures and scored for the presence of those facial features that discriminated between such displays in the drawings of two American samples. Threatening masks contained a significantly higher number of these characteristics across all cultures examined. The second study determined whether the information provided by the facial display might be more primary nonrepresentational visual patterns than facial features with obvious denotative meaning (e.g., diagonal lines rather than downturned eyebrows). The subjective response to sets of diagonal, angular, and curvilinear visual stimuli revealed that the nonrepresentational features of angularity and diagonality in the visual stimulus appeared to have the ability to evoke the subjective responses that convey the meaning of threat.

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3367283     DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.54.4.647

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  16 in total

1.  Functional connectivity between amygdala and facial regions involved in recognition of facial threat.

Authors:  Motohide Miyahara; Tokiko Harada; Ted Ruffman; Norihiro Sadato; Tetsuya Iidaka
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  The Diagnosticity of Color for Emotional Objects.

Authors:  Brenton W McMenamin; Jasmine Radue; Joanna Trask; Kristin Huskamp; Daniel Kersten; Chad J Marsolek
Journal:  Motiv Emot       Date:  2013-09-01

3.  Do threatening stimuli draw or hold visual attention in subclinical anxiety?

Authors:  E Fox; R Russo; R Bowles; K Dutton
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2001-12

4.  The face is not an empty canvas: how facial expressions interact with facial appearance.

Authors:  Ursula Hess; Reginald B Adams; Robert E Kleck
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-12-12       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  The face is more than its parts--brain dynamics of enhanced spatial attention to schematic threat.

Authors:  Mathias Weymar; Andreas Löw; Arne Ohman; Alfons O Hamm
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Simple geometric shapes are implicitly associated with affective value.

Authors:  Christine L Larson; Joel Aronoff; Elizabeth L Steuer
Journal:  Motiv Emot       Date:  2011-10-19

7.  Why Is 10 Past 10 the Default Setting for Clocks and Watches in Advertisements? A Psychological Experiment.

Authors:  Ahmed A Karim; Britta Lützenkirchen; Eman Khedr; Radwa Khalil
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-08-23

8.  Spider phobics more easily see a spider in morphed schematic pictures.

Authors:  Iris-Tatjana Kolassa; Arlette Buchmann; Romy Lauche; Stephan Kolassa; Ivailo Partchev; Wolfgang Hr Miltner; Frauke Musial
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2007-11-19       Impact factor: 3.759

9.  Amygdala and fusiform gyrus temporal dynamics: responses to negative facial expressions.

Authors:  Jennifer C Britton; Lisa M Shin; Lisa Feldman Barrett; Scott L Rauch; Christopher I Wright
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2008-05-12       Impact factor: 3.288

10.  Affective Priming by Simple Geometric Shapes: Evidence from Event-related Brain Potentials.

Authors:  Yinan Wang; Qin Zhang
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-06-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.