Mary E Sterrett1, Michael S Bloom2, Erica L Jamro3, Abby G Wenzel1, Rebecca J Wineland1, Elizabeth R Unal4, John Brock5, John Kucklick6, Kelly Garcia2, Roger B Newman1. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA. 2. Department of Global and Community Health, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030, USA. 3. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University at Albany, State University of New York, Rensselaer, NY 12144, USA. 4. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, IL 62702, USA. 5. Department of Chemistry, University of North Carolina Asheville, Asheville, NC 28804, USA. 6. Hollings Marine Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Charleston, SC 29412, USA.
Abstract
Background: Differential exposure to endocrine-disrupting chemicals, including phthalate diesters, may contribute to persistent racial/ethnic disparities in women's reproductive health outcomes. We sought to characterize sources of gestational exposure to these agents that may differ according to maternal race. Methods: We enrolled pregnant Black (n = 198), including African American, and White (n = 197) women during the second trimester, and measured eight phthalate monoester metabolites in urine. We assessed confounder-adjusted associations between multiple food and beverage consumption habits, summarized using a principal component analysis, as predictors of maternal urinary phthalate metabolite levels, stratified by race. Results: Whites reported significantly greater unprocessed food consumption (42.5% vs. 32.0%; p < 0.001) and storage of food in clear unbreakable plastic containers (66.5% vs. 49.3%; p < 0.001) than Blacks, while Blacks consumed more canned fruits and vegetables (23.5% vs. 12.2%; p < 0.001) than Whites. Using plastics for food storage, microwaving in plastic containers, and using hard plastic water bottles was associated with urinary phthalate concentrations, especially DEHP metabolites (e.g., mean difference = 5.13%; 95% CI: 3.05, 7.25). These associations were driven primarily by Black pregnant women. Conclusions: Targeted interventions to reduce maternal exposure to phthalates need to be designed with specific attention to differences in food and beverage consumption behaviors among Black and White women.
Background: Differential exposure to endocrine-disrupting chemicals, including phthalate diesters, may contribute to persistent racial/ethnic disparities in women's reproductive health outcomes. We sought to characterize sources of gestational exposure to these agents that may differ according to maternal race. Methods: We enrolled pregnant Black (n = 198), including African American, and White (n = 197) women during the second trimester, and measured eight phthalate monoester metabolites in urine. We assessed confounder-adjusted associations between multiple food and beverage consumption habits, summarized using a principal component analysis, as predictors of maternal urinary phthalate metabolite levels, stratified by race. Results: Whites reported significantly greater unprocessed food consumption (42.5% vs. 32.0%; p < 0.001) and storage of food in clear unbreakable plastic containers (66.5% vs. 49.3%; p < 0.001) than Blacks, while Blacks consumed more canned fruits and vegetables (23.5% vs. 12.2%; p < 0.001) than Whites. Using plastics for food storage, microwaving in plastic containers, and using hard plastic water bottles was associated with urinary phthalate concentrations, especially DEHP metabolites (e.g., mean difference = 5.13%; 95% CI: 3.05, 7.25). These associations were driven primarily by Black pregnant women. Conclusions: Targeted interventions to reduce maternal exposure to phthalates need to be designed with specific attention to differences in food and beverage consumption behaviors among Black and White women.
Entities:
Keywords:
female; phthalic acids/urine; pregnancy; questionnaires; racial groups
Authors: M J Silva; J A Reidy; A R Herbert; J L Preau; L L Needham; A M Calafat Journal: Bull Environ Contam Toxicol Date: 2004-06 Impact factor: 2.151
Authors: Gary Adamkiewicz; Ami R Zota; M Patricia Fabian; Teresa Chahine; Rhona Julien; John D Spengler; Jonathan I Levy Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2011-08-11 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Sheela Sathyanarayana; Garry Alcedo; Brian E Saelens; Chuan Zhou; Russell L Dills; Jianbo Yu; Bruce Lanphear Journal: J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol Date: 2013-02-27 Impact factor: 5.563
Authors: David E Cantonwine; José F Cordero; Luis O Rivera-González; Liza V Anzalota Del Toro; Kelly K Ferguson; Bhramar Mukherjee; Antonia M Calafat; Noe Crespo; Braulio Jiménez-Vélez; Ingrid Y Padilla; Akram N Alshawabkeh; John D Meeker Journal: Environ Int Date: 2013-10-24 Impact factor: 9.621
Authors: Katherine E Kelley; Sonia Hernández-Díaz; Erica L Chaplin; Russ Hauser; Allen A Mitchell Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2011-12-15 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Jung-Wan Koo; Frederick Parham; Michael C Kohn; Scott A Masten; John W Brock; Larry L Needham; Christopher J Portier Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2002-04 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Samantha E Serrano; Catherine J Karr; Noah S Seixas; Ruby H N Nguyen; Emily S Barrett; Sarah Janssen; Bruce Redmon; Shanna H Swan; Sheela Sathyanarayana Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2014-06-12 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Hongxiu Liu; Yuyan Wang; Kurunthachalam Kannan; Mengling Liu; Hongkai Zhu; Yu Chen; Linda G Kahn; Melanie H Jacobson; Bo Gu; Shilpi Mehta-Lee; Sara G Brubaker; Akhgar Ghassabian; Leonardo Trasande Journal: Environ Res Date: 2022-03-28 Impact factor: 8.431