Literature DB >> 33671342

Comparison of Huggins Coefficients and Osmotic Second Virial Coefficients of Buffered Solutions of Monoclonal Antibodies.

Jai A Pathak1, Sean Nugent1, Michael F. Bender1, Christopher J Roberts2, Robin J Curtis3, Jack F Douglas4.   

Abstract

The Huggins coefficient kH is a well-known metric for quantifying the increase in solution viscosity arising from intermolecular interactions in relatively dilute macromolecular solutions, and there has been much interest in this solution property in connection with developing improved antibody therapeutics. While numerous kH measurements have been reported for select monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) solutions, there has been limited study of kH in terms of the fundamental molecular interactions that determine this property. In this paper, we compare measurements of the osmotic second virial coefficient B22, a common metric of intermolecular and interparticle interaction strength, to measurements of kH for model antibody solutions. This comparison is motivated by the seminal work of Russel for hard sphere particles having a short-range "sticky" interparticle interaction, and we also compare our data with known results for uncharged flexible polymers having variable excluded volume interactions because proteins are polypeptide chains. Our observations indicate that neither the adhesive hard sphere model, a common colloidal model of globular proteins, nor the familiar uncharged flexible polymer model, an excellent model of intrinsically disordered proteins, describes the dependence of kH of these antibodies on B22. Clearly, an improved understanding of protein and ion solvation by water as well as dipole-dipole and charge-dipole effects is required to understand the significance of kH from the standpoint of fundamental protein-protein interactions. Despite shortcomings in our theoretical understanding of kH for antibody solutions, this quantity provides a useful practical measure of the strength of interprotein interactions at elevated protein concentrations that is of direct significance for the development of antibody formulations that minimize the solution viscosity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Huggins coefficient; adhesive hard spheres; flexible polymers; hard spheres; intrinsic viscosity; monoclonal antibody; second virial coefficient; static light scattering; viscosity

Year:  2021        PMID: 33671342      PMCID: PMC7922252          DOI: 10.3390/polym13040601

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Polymers (Basel)        ISSN: 2073-4360            Impact factor:   4.329


  81 in total

Review 1.  Protein aggregation and its inhibition in biopharmaceutics.

Authors:  Wei Wang
Journal:  Int J Pharm       Date:  2005-01-06       Impact factor: 5.875

2.  Symmetry, equivalence, and molecular self-assembly.

Authors:  Kevin Van Workum; Jack F Douglas
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2006-03-07

Review 3.  The complex inter-relationships between protein flexibility and stability.

Authors:  Tim J Kamerzell; C Russell Middaugh
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.534

4.  Specific interactions in high concentration antibody solutions resulting in high viscosity.

Authors:  Sandeep Yadav; Jun Liu; Steven J Shire; Devendra S Kalonia
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.534

5.  Electrostatically Mediated Protein-Protein Interactions for Monoclonal Antibodies: A Combined Experimental and Coarse-Grained Molecular Modeling Approach.

Authors:  Glenn M Ferreira; Cesar Calero-Rubio; Hasige A Sathish; Richard L Remmele; Christopher J Roberts
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 3.534

6.  Coarse-Grained Antibody Models for "Weak" Protein-Protein Interactions from Low to High Concentrations.

Authors:  Cesar Calero-Rubio; Atul Saluja; Christopher J Roberts
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 2.991

7.  Calculation and measurement of the dipole moment of small proteins: use of protein data base.

Authors:  S Takashima; K Asami
Journal:  Biopolymers       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 2.505

8.  Effects of salts from the Hofmeister series on the conformational stability, aggregation propensity, and local flexibility of an IgG1 monoclonal antibody.

Authors:  Ranajoy Majumdar; Prakash Manikwar; John M Hickey; Hardeep S Samra; Hasige A Sathish; Steven M Bishop; C Russell Middaugh; David B Volkin; David D Weis
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 3.162

Review 9.  On the binding affinity of macromolecular interactions: daring to ask why proteins interact.

Authors:  Panagiotis L Kastritis; Alexandre M J J Bonvin
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 10.  Peptides, Antibodies, Peptide Antibodies and More.

Authors:  Nicole Trier; Paul Hansen; Gunnar Houen
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-12-13       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.