| Literature DB >> 33670360 |
Mattia Trunfio1, Francesco Venuti1, Francesca Alladio1, Bianca Maria Longo1, Elisa Burdino2, Francesco Cerutti2, Valeria Ghisetti2, Roberto Bertucci1, Carlo Picco3, Stefano Bonora1, Giovanni Di Perri1,3, Andrea Calcagno1.
Abstract
To date, there is no severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2-(SARS-CoV-2)-specific prognostic biomarker available. We assessed whether SARS-CoV-2 cycle threshold (Ct) value at diagnosis could predict novel CoronaVirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) severity, clinical manifestations, and six-month sequelae. Hospitalized and outpatient cases were randomly sampled from the diagnoses of March 2020 and data collected at 6 months by interview and from the regional database for COVID-19 emergency. Patients were stratified according to their RNA-dependent-RNA-polymerase Ct in the nasopharyngeal swab at diagnosis as follows: Group A ≤ 20.0, 20.0 < group B ≤ 28.0, and Group C > 28.0. Disease severity was classified according to a composite scale evaluating hospital admission, worst oxygen support required, and survival. Two hundred patients were included, 27.5% in Groups A and B both, 45.0% in Group C; 90% of patients were symptomatic and 63.7% were hospitalized. The median time from COVID-19 onset to swab collection was five days. Lethality, disease severity, type, and number of signs and symptoms, as well as six-month sequelae distributed inversely among the groups with respect to SARS-CoV-2 Ct. After controlling for confounding, SARS-CoV-2 Ct at diagnosis was still associated with COVID-19-related death (p = 0.023), disease severity (p = 0.023), number of signs and symptoms (p < 0.01), and presence of six-month sequelae (p < 0.01). Early quantification of SARS-CoV-2 may be a useful predictive marker to inform differential strategies of clinical management and resource allocation.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2 swab; cycle threshold; mortality; outcomes; predictive biomarker; sequelae; severity; viral load
Year: 2021 PMID: 33670360 DOI: 10.3390/v13020281
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Viruses ISSN: 1999-4915 Impact factor: 5.048