Literature DB >> 33670133

Ovulatory-Based FET Cycles May Achieve Higher Pregnancy Rates in the General Population and among Anovulatory Women.

Nardin Aslih1, Dore Dorzia1, Yuval Atzmon1, Daniella Estrada1, Adrian Ellenbogen1, Asaf Bilgory1, Einat Shalom-Paz1.   

Abstract

This study evaluated which endometrial preparation protocol in frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles provides the best results for polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) patients and the general population. This retrospective study of 634 FET cycles was conducted 2016-2018. Cycles were divided into Group A: Artificial endometrial preparations for FET (aFET; n = 348), Group B: Ovulatory cycle (n = 286) to compare two methods of endometrial preparation for FET. Artificial endometrial preparation with exogenous estrogen and progesterone versus natural ovulation cycles, modified natural cycles using hCG for the final triggering and letrozole-induced ovulation with hCG. Anovulatory patients were analyzed separately. Anovulatory PCOS patients had significantly higher pregnancy rates with letrozole treatment compared with aFET cycles (44% vs. 22.5%; p = 0.044). For the entire cohort, ovulatory cycles and aFET were similar in terms of patient characteristics, demographics, infertility causes, treatment protocols and number of embryos transferred. Although the mean ESHRE score of the transferred embryos was higher in the aFET group, we found higher clinical pregnancy rate in the ovulatory cycle FET (41.3% vs. 27.3%, p < 0.0001). A better pregnancy rate was found after ovulatory cycle FET. In the ovulatory cycles, the outcome of letrozole-induced and non-induced cycles were comparable. PCOS patients, as well as the general population, may benefit from ovulation induced FET cycles, with significantly better outcomes in FET in ovulatory cycles.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PCOS; aromatase inhibitor; artificial cycle embryo transfer; endometrial preparation; frozen embryo transfer; natural cycle embryo transfer

Year:  2021        PMID: 33670133     DOI: 10.3390/jcm10040703

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Med        ISSN: 2077-0383            Impact factor:   4.241


  5 in total

1.  Natural cycles achieve better pregnancy outcomes than artificial cycles in non-PCOS women undergoing vitrified single-blastocyst transfer: a retrospective cohort study of 6840 cycles.

Authors:  Jing Li; Qian Sun; Meng Zhang; Xiao Fu; Yiting Zhang; Shanshan Gao; Jinlong Ma
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  The effect of mildly stimulated cycle versus artificial cycle on pregnancy outcomes in overweight/obese women with PCOS prior to frozen embryo transfer: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Lu Guan; Haicui Wu; Chaofeng Wei; Conghui Pang; Danqi Liu; Xiaona Yu; Shan Xiang; Fang Lian
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-05-07       Impact factor: 3.105

3.  Systematic review update and meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized controlled trials of ovarian stimulation versus artificial cycle for endometrial preparation prior to frozen embryo transfer in women with polycystic ovary syndrome.

Authors:  Yingying Zhang; Ling Wu; Tin Chiu Li; Chi Chiu Wang; Tao Zhang; Jacqueline Pui Wah Chung
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2022-04-02       Impact factor: 5.211

4.  Ovulation induction regimens are associated with a higher rate of livebirth after frozen single-blastocyst transfer among women with polycystic ovary syndrome.

Authors:  Yue Niu; Dingying Zhao; Yuhuan Wang; Lu Suo; Jialin Zou; Daimin Wei
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-08-15       Impact factor: 6.055

5.  Increased risk of abortion after frozen-thawed embryo transfer in women with polycystic ovary syndrome phenotypes A and D.

Authors:  Qiumin Wang; Yanjun Zheng; Ping Li; Guanqun Zhang; Shanshan Gao; Ze Wang; Baozhen Hao; Yuhua Shi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 4.996

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.