Literature DB >> 33669750

Patient Perspectives on Key Outcomes for Vocational Rehabilitation Interventions Following Traumatic Injury.

Kay Bridger1,2, Blerina Kellezi1,2, Denise Kendrick2, Kate Radford2, Stephen Timmons3, Mike Rennoldson1, Trevor Jones2, Jade Kettlewell2.   

Abstract

Returning to work after traumatic injury can have a range of benefits, but there is currently little research that incorporates patient perspectives to identify outcomes of vocational rehabilitation interventions that are important to survivors. Trauma survivors (n = 17) participated in in-depth semi-structured interviews or focus groups exploring outcomes that were important to them for recovery and return to work. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. Participants identified a range of outcomes that they considered important and necessary to facilitate a successful and sustainable return to work: physical and psychological recovery, purposeful life engagement, managing expectations of recovery, managing expectations about return to work, and employers' expectations. Our participants advocated for a multifaceted and biopsychosocial understanding of recovery and outcomes that need to be captured for vocational rehabilitation interventions. Implications for practice and research are discussed, and recommendations are given based on the findings.

Entities:  

Keywords:  outcomes; patient perspectives; return to work; traumatic injuries; vocational rehabilitation

Year:  2021        PMID: 33669750      PMCID: PMC7922329          DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18042035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health        ISSN: 1660-4601            Impact factor:   3.390


  57 in total

1.  Reflections on life: experiences of individuals with brain injury during the transition from hospital to home.

Authors:  Emily Nalder; Jennifer Fleming; Petrea Cornwell; Cassandra Shields; Michele Foster
Journal:  Brain Inj       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 2.  Return to work after traumatic brain injury: Systematic review.

Authors:  Mikhail Saltychev; Merja Eskola; Olli Tenovuo; Katri Laimi
Journal:  Brain Inj       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 2.311

3.  Mixing qualitative methods.

Authors:  Janice M Morse
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2009-11

4.  Injured workers' construction of expectations of return to work with sub-acute back pain: the role of perceived uncertainty.

Authors:  Alison M Stewart; Emily Polak; Richard Young; Izabela Z Schultz
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2012-03

Review 5.  Perceived factors in return to work after acquired brain injury: A qualitative meta-synthesis.

Authors:  Ingeborg Frostad Liaset; Håvard Lorås
Journal:  Scand J Occup Ther       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 2.611

Review 6.  Systematic review of return to work after mild traumatic brain injury: results of the International Collaboration on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Prognosis.

Authors:  Carol Cancelliere; Vicki L Kristman; J David Cassidy; Cesar A Hincapié; Pierre Côté; Eleanor Boyle; Linda J Carroll; Britt-Marie Stålnacke; Catharina Nygren-de Boussard; Jörgen Borg
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.966

7.  Minimum data set to measure rehabilitation needs and health outcome after major trauma: application of an international framework.

Authors:  Karen P Hoffman; Diane E Playford; Eva Grill; Helene L Soberg; Karim Brohi
Journal:  Eur J Phys Rehabil Med       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 2.874

Review 8.  How many people return to work after acquired brain injury?: a systematic review.

Authors:  J M van Velzen; C A M van Bennekom; M J A Edelaar; J K Sluiter; M H W Frings-Dresen
Journal:  Brain Inj       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 9.  A systematic review of studies measuring health-related quality of life of general injury populations.

Authors:  Suzanne Polinder; Juanita A Haagsma; Eefje Belt; Ronan A Lyons; Vicki Erasmus; Johan Lund; Ed F van Beeck
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  The changing face of major trauma in the UK.

Authors:  A Kehoe; J E Smith; A Edwards; D Yates; F Lecky
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.740

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.