Literature DB >> 33669715

Effects of a Music-Based Rhythmic Auditory Stimulation on Gait and Balance in Subacute Stroke.

Samira Gonzalez-Hoelling1, Carme Bertran-Noguer2,3, Gloria Reig-Garcia3, Rosa Suñer-Soler2,3.   

Abstract

Gait and balance impairments are common after stroke. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of a music-based rhythmic auditory stimulation (RAS) in combination with conventional physiotherapy on gait parameters and walking ability in subacute stroke. This single-blind, historical controlled trial, included 55 patients who had suffered a stroke within the three weeks prior to enrolment. Patients from 2018 (n = 27) were assigned as the historical control group whereas 2019 patients (n = 28) received music-based RAS three times a week. Both groups received 11 h of conventional physiotherapy per week during hospitalization. Primary outcomes were gait and balance parameters (Tinetti test and Timed Up&Go test) and walking ability (Functional Ambulation Category scale). Secondary outcomes were trunk control, assistive devices, functional independence (Functional Independence Measure, Barthel index), and stroke severity and disability (modified Rankin scale, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale).
Results: No between-group differences were identified for gait and balance parameters nor for secondary outcomes. Significant between-group differences were observed in the Functional Ambulation Category: the intervention group (Δmean ± SD; 3.43 ± 1.17) showed greater improvement (p = 0.002) than the control group (Δmean ± SD; 2.48 ± 1.09). Compared with conventional physiotherapy alone, our results suggest that the walking ability of subacute stroke patients might be improved with music-based RAS combined with conventional physiotherapy, but this treatment is not more effective than conventional physiotherapy in obtaining gait and balance gains.

Entities:  

Keywords:  musical therapy; physical therapy; rehabilitation; rhythmical auditory stimulation; stroke

Year:  2021        PMID: 33669715      PMCID: PMC7923168          DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18042032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health        ISSN: 1660-4601            Impact factor:   3.390


  35 in total

1.  National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS).

Authors:  Li Khim Kwah; Joanna Diong
Journal:  J Physiother       Date:  2014-05-03       Impact factor: 7.000

Review 2.  Global stroke statistics.

Authors:  Amanda G Thrift; Tharshanah Thayabaranathan; George Howard; Virginia J Howard; Peter M Rothwell; Valery L Feigin; Bo Norrving; Geoffrey A Donnan; Dominique A Cadilhac
Journal:  Int J Stroke       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 5.266

3.  Effect of Rhythm of Music Therapy on Gait in Patients with Stroke.

Authors:  Yao Wang; Wei-Yi Pan; Fei Li; Jun-Sheng Ge; Xiang Zhang; Xun Luo; Yu-Long Wang
Journal:  J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 2.136

Review 4.  Rhythmic Auditory Cueing in Motor Rehabilitation for Stroke Patients: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Ga Eul Yoo; Soo Ji Kim
Journal:  J Music Ther       Date:  2016-04-15

5.  Test-retest reliability and construct validity of the tinetti performance-oriented mobility assessment in people with stroke.

Authors:  Jennifer Canbek; George Fulk; Leah Nof; John Echternach
Journal:  J Neurol Phys Ther       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 3.649

6.  How predictive is the MMSE for cognitive performance after stroke?

Authors:  Ariane Bour; Sascha Rasquin; Anita Boreas; Martien Limburg; Frans Verhey
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2009-11-22       Impact factor: 4.849

7.  Effects of intensive therapy using gait trainer or floor walking exercises early after stroke.

Authors:  Sinikka H Peurala; Olavi Airaksinen; Pirjo Huuskonen; Pekka Jäkälä; Mika Juhakoski; Kaisa Sandell; Ina M Tarkka; Juhani Sivenius
Journal:  J Rehabil Med       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  Effect of Rhythmic Auditory Stimulation on Hemiplegic Gait Patterns.

Authors:  Yoon-Kyum Shin; Hyun Ju Chong; Soo Ji Kim; Sung-Rae Cho
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.759

9.  Bias caused by sampling error in meta-analysis with small sample sizes.

Authors:  Lifeng Lin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Experiences from a multimodal rhythm and music-based rehabilitation program in late phase of stroke recovery - A qualitative study.

Authors:  Petra Pohl; Gunnel Carlsson; Lina Bunketorp Käll; Michael Nilsson; Christian Blomstrand
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Potential Benefits of Music Therapy on Stroke Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Chengyan Xu; Zixia He; Zhipeng Shen; Fei Huang
Journal:  Oxid Med Cell Longev       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 7.310

2.  The Effect of Music-Based Rhythmic Auditory Stimulation on Balance and Functional Outcomes after Stroke.

Authors:  Samira Gonzalez-Hoelling; Gloria Reig-Garcia; Carme Bertran-Noguer; Rosa Suñer-Soler
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-12

Review 3.  Neurological music therapy during the COVID-19 outbreak: updates and future challenges.

Authors:  Claudia Vinciguerra; Antonio Federico
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 3.830

4.  Improvement of Gait in Patients with Stroke Using Rhythmic Sensory Stimulation: A Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Yungon Lee; Sunghoon Shin
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 5.  Rhythm and Music-Based Interventions in Motor Rehabilitation: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Thenille Braun Janzen; Yuko Koshimori; Nicole M Richard; Michael H Thaut
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Comparative Efficacy of Active Group Music Intervention versus Group Music Listening in Alzheimer's Disease.

Authors:  María Gómez-Gallego; Juan Cándido Gómez-Gallego; María Gallego-Mellado; Javier García-García
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 3.390

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.