| Literature DB >> 33669705 |
Kristina Eliasson1, Gunilla Dahlgren2, Therese Hellman1, Charlotte Lewis2, Peter Palm1, Magnus Svartengren1, Teresia Nyman1.
Abstract
Exposure assessment seldom precedes the medical health checks in occupational health surveillance. In order to emphasize the interconnection between exposure assessment and medical health checks, a process model was developed. The process model aimed to guide employers and Occupational Health Service providers through the execution of occupational health surveillance. The objective of this qualitative study is to explore company representatives' experiences of the process model, in terms of feasibility and values, and to identify factors that facilitate or impede the process. Thirty-three company representatives from ten companies were interviewed. Interviews were analyzed using content analysis. The company representatives experienced that the model contributed to increased risk awareness and understanding of the exposure effects on workers' health. They valued the exposure assessments performed by an ergonomics expert, which led to the discovery of previously unidentified risks. The feasibility was facilitated by: a joint start-up meeting in which the process was planned, clear communication between the involved parties, and clarity regarding the process ownership. The findings reveal that a guiding process model is valuable for the execution of occupational health surveillance. However, the model should not only define the components included; a practical guide concerning how the process can be executed is also needed.Entities:
Keywords: ergonomics; legislation; medical health checks; musculoskeletal disorders; qualitative research; risk assessment; work environment
Year: 2021 PMID: 33669705 PMCID: PMC7922478 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18042018
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390