Literature DB >> 33669476

Commitment, Dominance, and Mate Value: Power Bases in Long-Term Heterosexual Couples.

Jitka Lindová1,2, Tereza Habešová1, Kateřina Klapilová1,2, Jan Havlíček2,3.   

Abstract

We assessed the relative contribution of economic, personal, and affective power bases to perceived relationship power. Based on evolutionary studies, we predicted that personality dominance and mate value should represent alternative personal power bases. Our sample was comprised of 84 Czech heterosexual couples. We measured the economic power base using self-report scales assessing education, income and work status. Personal power bases were assessed using self-report measures of personality dominance (International Personality Item Pool Dominance and Assertiveness subscale from NEO Personality Inventory-Revised Extraversion scale), and partner-report measures of mate value (Trait-Specific Dependence Inventory, factors 2-6). The first factor of Trait-Specific Dependence Inventory, which measures agreeableness/commitment was used to assess the affective power base. Our results show that perceived relationship power is associated with a perception of partner's high agreeableness/commitment. Moreover, women's personality dominance and mate value are also linked with perceived relationship power, which supports our evolutionary prediction of dominance and mate value working as power bases for women. The stronger effect of women's than men's power bases may be due to gender differences in investment into relationships and/or due to transition to more equal relationships currently sought by women in the Czech Republic.

Entities:  

Keywords:  commitment; dominance; mate value; power bases; relationship power

Year:  2021        PMID: 33669476      PMCID: PMC7920442          DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18041914

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health        ISSN: 1660-4601            Impact factor:   3.390


  17 in total

1.  Trait-specific dependence in romantic relationships.

Authors:  Bruce J Ellis; Jeffry A Simpson; Lorne Campbell
Journal:  J Pers       Date:  2002-10

2.  Sexual desire and relationship functioning: the effects of marital satisfaction and power.

Authors:  Michael Brezsnyak; Mark A Whisman
Journal:  J Sex Marital Ther       Date:  2004 May-Jun

Review 3.  Models of the self: self-construals and gender.

Authors:  S E Cross; L Madson
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 17.737

4.  New narcissism scales for the California Psychological Inventory and MMPI.

Authors:  P Wink; H G Gough
Journal:  J Pers Assess       Date:  1990

5.  Correlates of extra-dyadic sex in Czech heterosexual couples: does sexual behavior of parents matter?

Authors:  Jan Havlicek; Barbara Husarova; Veronika Rezacova; Katerina Klapilova
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2011-12

6.  Two ways to the top: evidence that dominance and prestige are distinct yet viable avenues to social rank and influence.

Authors:  Joey T Cheng; Jessica L Tracy; Tom Foulsham; Alan Kingstone; Joseph Henrich
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2012-11-19

7.  Why do men seek status? Fitness payoffs to dominance and prestige.

Authors:  Christopher von Rueden; Michael Gurven; Hillard Kaplan
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Mate choice trade-offs and women's preference for physically attractive men.

Authors:  D Waynforth
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2001-09

9.  He said, she said: concordance between sexual partners.

Authors:  S Marie Harvey; Sheryl Thorburn Bird; Jillian T Henderson; Linda J Beckman; Heather C Huszti
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.830

10.  Predictors of body image during the first year postpartum:a prospective study.

Authors:  Sofia Rallis; Helen Skouteris; Eleanor H Wertheim; Susan J Paxton
Journal:  Women Health       Date:  2007
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.