Literature DB >> 33669277

Sarcopenia Risk Evaluation in a Sample of Hospitalized Elderly Men and Women: Combined Use of the Mini Sarcopenia Risk Assessment (MSRA) and the SARC-F.

Andrea P Rossi1, Cesare Caliari1, Silvia Urbani1, Francesco Fantin1, Piero Brandimarte1, Angela Martini1, Elena Zoico1, Giulia Zoso1, Alessio Babbanini1, Alfredo Zanotelli1, Mauro Zamboni1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: SARC-F and Mini Sarcopenia Risk Assessment (MSRA) questionnaires have been proposed as screening tools to identify patients at risk of sarcopenia. The aim of this study is to test the use of SARC-F and MSRA, alone and combined, as a pre-screening tool for sarcopenia in geriatric inpatients.
METHODS: 152 subjects, 94 men and 58 women, aged 70 to 94, underwent muscle mass evaluation by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), muscle strength evaluation by handgrip, and completed the MSRA, SARC-F and Activity of daily living (ADL) questionnaires.
RESULTS: 66 subjects (43.4%) were classified as sarcopenic according to the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People 2 (EWGSOP2) criteria. The 7-item SARC-F and MRSA and 5-item MSRA showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.666 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.542-0.789), 0.730 (95% CI: 0.617-0.842) and 0.710 (95% CI: 0.593-0.827), respectively. The optimal cut-off points for sarcopenia detection were determined for each questionnaire using the Youden index method. The newly calculated cut-off points were ≤25 and ≤40 for MSRA 7- and 5-items, respectively. The ideal cut-off for the SARC-F was a score ≥3. Applying this new cut-off in our study population, sensitivity and specificity of the 7-item MSRA were 0.757 and 0.651, and 0.688 and 0.679 for the 5-item MSRA, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity of SARC-F were 0.524 and 0.765, respectively. The combined use of the 7-item SARC-F and MSRA improved the accuracy in sarcopenia diagnosis, with a specificity and sensitivity of 1.00 and 0.636.
CONCLUSION: 7-item SARC-F and MSRA may be co-administered in hospital wards as an easy, feasible, first-line tool to identify sarcopenic subjects.

Entities:  

Keywords:  muscle strength; physical limitations; sarcopenia; screening

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33669277      PMCID: PMC7920060          DOI: 10.3390/nu13020635

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nutrients        ISSN: 2072-6643            Impact factor:   5.717


  27 in total

1.  SARC-F: a simple questionnaire to rapidly diagnose sarcopenia.

Authors:  Theodore K Malmstrom; John E Morley
Journal:  J Am Med Dir Assoc       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 4.669

2.  Epidemiology of sarcopenia among the elderly in New Mexico.

Authors:  R N Baumgartner; K M Koehler; D Gallagher; L Romero; S B Heymsfield; R R Ross; P J Garry; R D Lindeman
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1998-04-15       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 3.  The multidomain mobility lab in older persons: from bench to bedside. The assessment of body composition in older persons at risk of mobility limitations.

Authors:  Andrea P Rossi; Tamara B Harris; Francesco Fantin; Fabio Armellini; Mauro Zamboni
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.116

4.  Midlife hand grip strength as a predictor of old age disability.

Authors:  T Rantanen; J M Guralnik; D Foley; K Masaki; S Leveille; J D Curb; L White
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-02-10       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Validity of fan-beam dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for measuring fat-free mass and leg muscle mass. Health, Aging, and Body Composition Study--Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry and Body Composition Working Group.

Authors:  M Visser; T Fuerst; T Lang; L Salamone; T B Harris
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1999-10

6.  The loss of skeletal muscle strength, mass, and quality in older adults: the health, aging and body composition study.

Authors:  Bret H Goodpaster; Seok Won Park; Tamara B Harris; Steven B Kritchevsky; Michael Nevitt; Ann V Schwartz; Eleanor M Simonsick; Frances A Tylavsky; Marjolein Visser; Anne B Newman
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 6.053

7.  Comparing Mini Sarcopenia Risk Assessment With SARC-F for Screening Sarcopenia in Community-Dwelling Older Adults.

Authors:  Ming Yang; Xiaoyi Hu; Lingling Xie; Luoying Zhang; Jie Zhou; Jing Lin; Ying Wang; Yaqi Li; Zengli Han; Daipei Zhang; Yun Zuo; Ying Li
Journal:  J Am Med Dir Assoc       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 4.669

8.  Comparison of four sarcopenia screening questionnaires in community-dwelling older adults from Poland using six sets of international diagnostic criteria of sarcopenia.

Authors:  Roma Krzymińska-Siemaszko; Sławomir Tobis; Marta Lewandowicz; Katarzyna Wieczorowska-Tobis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The role of sarcopenia questionnaires in hospitalized patients with chronic heart failure.

Authors:  Wenxue Zhao; Miao Lu; Xiangming Wang; Yan Guo
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 3.636

10.  SARC-F: a symptom score to predict persons with sarcopenia at risk for poor functional outcomes.

Authors:  Theodore K Malmstrom; Douglas K Miller; Eleanor M Simonsick; Luigi Ferrucci; John E Morley
Journal:  J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 12.910

View more
  1 in total

1.  Sarcopenia screening in elderly with Alzheimer's disease: performances of the SARC-F-3 and MSRA-5 questionnaires.

Authors:  Marco Filardi; Giancarlo Logroscino; Giulia Bramato; Roberta Barone; Maria Rosaria Barulli; Chiara Zecca; Rosanna Tortelli
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2022-09-17       Impact factor: 4.070

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.