Literature DB >> 33668149

Feasibility and Acceptability of Accelerometer Measurement of Physical Activity in Pregnant Adolescents.

Emma L M Clark1, Lauren D Gulley1,2, Allison M Hilkin2, Bonny Rockette-Wagner3, Heather J Leach4,5, Rachel G Lucas-Thompson1,5, Marian Tanofsky-Kraff6, Kristen J Nadeau2, Stephen M Scott2,7, Jeanelle L Sheeder2,7, Lauren B Shomaker1,2,5.   

Abstract

During pregnancy, physical activity relates to better maternal and child mental and physical health. Accelerometry is thought to be effective for assessing free-living physical activity, but the feasibility/acceptability of accelerometer use in pregnant adolescents has not been reported. In this short communication, we conducted secondary analysis of a small pilot study to describe the feasibility/acceptability of accelerometry in pregnant adolescents and the preliminary results of physical activity characteristics. Participants were recruited from a multidisciplinary adolescent perinatal clinic. Physical activity was assessed with wrist-worn accelerometers. Feasibility was described as median days of valid wear (≥10 h of wear/day) for the total sample and the number/percentage of participants with ≥4 days of valid wear. Sensitivity analyses of wear time were performed. Acceptability ratings were collected by structured interview. Thirty-six pregnant (14.6 ± 2.1 gestational weeks) adolescents (17.9 ± 1.0 years) participated. Median days of valid wear were 4 days. Seventeen participants (51.5%) had ≥4 days of valid wear. There were no differences in characteristics of adolescents with vs. without ≥4 days of valid wear. Twenty participants (60.6%) had ≥3 days of valid wear, 24 (72.7%) ≥2 valid days, and 27 (81.8%) ≥1 valid wear day. Acceptability ratings were neutral. Assessing physical activity with accelerometry in pregnant adolescents was neither feasible nor acceptable with the current conditions. Future research should investigate additional incentives and the potential utility of a lower wear-time criterion in pregnant adolescents.

Entities:  

Keywords:  at-risk; minorities; pregnancy measures; teen pregnancy; underserved populations

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33668149      PMCID: PMC7956371          DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18052216

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health        ISSN: 1660-4601            Impact factor:   4.614


  27 in total

1.  The Effects of Eight-Month Physical Activity Intervention on Vigilance Performance in Adult Obese Population.

Authors:  Cristina Monleón; Rafael Ballester; Carlos Sanchis; Francesc Llorens; Marta Martín; Ana Pablos
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 1.328

2.  Comparability and feasibility of wrist- and hip-worn accelerometers in free-living adolescents.

Authors:  Joseph J Scott; Alex V Rowlands; Dylan P Cliff; Philip J Morgan; Ronald C Plotnikoff; David R Lubans
Journal:  J Sci Med Sport       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 4.319

3.  Mental health in primary care for adolescent parents.

Authors:  Dayna Leplatte; Katherine Lisa Rosenblum; Emily Stanton; Nicole Miller; Maria Muzik
Journal:  Ment Health Fam Med       Date:  2012-01

4.  Reductions in heel bone quality across gestation are attenuated in pregnant adolescents with higher prepregnancy weight and greater increases in PTH across gestation.

Authors:  Corrie M Whisner; Bridget E Young; Frank R Witter; Zena Leah Harris; Ruth A Queenan; Elizabeth M Cooper; Kimberly O O'Brien
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 6.741

5.  Neighborhood social cohesion and youth participation in physical activity in Chicago.

Authors:  Angie L Cradock; Ichiro Kawachi; Graham A Colditz; Steven L Gortmaker; Stephen L Buka
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2008-11-25       Impact factor: 4.634

6.  Estimating physical activity in youth using a wrist accelerometer.

Authors:  Scott E Crouter; Jennifer I Flynn; David R Bassett
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 5.411

7.  Associations of diet and physical activity during pregnancy with risk for excessive gestational weight gain.

Authors:  Alison M Stuebe; Emily Oken; Matthew W Gillman
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-05-21       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  How many days of monitoring predict physical activity and sedentary behaviour in older adults?

Authors:  Teresa L Hart; Ann M Swartz; Susan E Cashin; Scott J Strath
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 6.457

9.  Variability and reliability study of overall physical activity and activity intensity levels using 24 h-accelerometry-assessed data.

Authors:  Lina Jaeschke; Astrid Steinbrecher; Stephanie Jeran; Stefan Konigorski; Tobias Pischon
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Physical activity and sedentary behavior during pregnancy and postpartum, measured using hip and wrist-worn accelerometers.

Authors:  Kathryn R Hesketh; Kelly R Evenson; Marissa Stroo; Shayna M Clancy; Truls Østbye; Sara E Benjamin-Neelon
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2018-04-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.