Literature DB >> 33666682

Surgical tracheostomy in a cohort of COVID-19 patients.

Patrick J Schuler1, Jens Greve2, Thomas K Hoffmann2, Janina Hahn2, Felix Boehm2, Bastian Bock3, Johannes Reins3, Ulrich Ehrmann4, Eberhard Barth3, Karl Traeger3, Bettina Jungwirth3, Martin Wepler3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: One of the main symptoms of severe infection with the new coronavirus‑2 (SARS-CoV-2) is hypoxemic respiratory failure because of viral pneumonia with the need for mechanical ventilation. Prolonged mechanical ventilation may require a tracheostomy, but the increased risk for contamination is a matter of considerable debate.
OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of safety and effects of surgical tracheostomy on ventilation parameters and outcome in patients with COVID-19. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective observational study between March 27 and May 18, 2020, in a single-center coronavirus disease-designated ICU at a tertiary care German hospital. PATIENTS: Patients with COVID-19 were treated with open surgical tracheostomy due to severe hypoxemic respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation. MEASUREMENTS: Clinical and ventilation data were obtained from medical records in a retrospective manner.
RESULTS: A total of 18 patients with confirmed SARS-CoV‑2 infection and surgical tracheostomy were analyzed. The age range was 42-87 years. All patients received open tracheostomy between 2-16 days after admission. Ventilation after tracheostomy was less invasive (reduction in PEAK and positive end-expiratory pressure [PEEP]) and lung compliance increased over time after tracheostomy. Also, sedative drugs could be reduced, and patients had a reduced need of norepinephrine to maintain hemodynamic stability. Six of 18 patients died. All surgical staff were equipped with N99-masks and facial shields or with powered air-purifying respirators (PAPR).
CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that open surgical tracheostomy can be performed without severe complications in patients with COVID-19. Tracheostomy may reduce invasiveness of mechanical ventilation and the need for sedative drugs and norepinehprine. Recommendations for personal protective equipment (PPE) for surgical staff should be followed when PPE is available to avoid contamination of the personnel.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coronavirus; Mortality; Surgery; Tracheostomy; Ventilation

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33666682      PMCID: PMC7934348          DOI: 10.1007/s00106-021-01021-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HNO        ISSN: 0017-6192            Impact factor:   1.284


  4 in total

1.  A TECHNIQUE OF TRACHEOSTOMY.

Authors:  C E KINLEY
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1965-01-09       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 2.  Percutaneous techniques versus surgical techniques for tracheostomy.

Authors:  Patrick Brass; Martin Hellmich; Angelika Ladra; Jürgen Ladra; Anna Wrzosek
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-07-20

Review 3.  To PAPR or not to PAPR?

Authors:  Vanessa Roberts
Journal:  Can J Respir Ther       Date:  2014

4.  Outcomes after Tracheostomy in COVID-19 Patients.

Authors:  Tiffany N Chao; Sean P Harbison; Benjamin M Braslow; Christoph T Hutchinson; Karthik Rajasekaran; Beatrice C Go; Ellen A Paul; Leah D Lambe; James J Kearney; Ara A Chalian; Maurizio F Cereda; Niels D Martin; Andrew R Haas; Joshua H Atkins; Christopher H Rassekh
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 12.969

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.