Huazhen Yang1,2, Wenwen Chen3, Fang Fang4, Unnur A Valdimarsdóttir5,6,7, Huan Song1,2,6. 1. West China Biomedical Big Data Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China. 2. Medical Big Data Center, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China. 3. Division of Nephrology, Kidney Research Institute, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Cancer Center (WC), West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China. 4. Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden. 5. Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden. 6. Center of Public Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland. 7. Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
We thank Augusto Ferraris and colleagues for their important comments on our study. We share their interest in advancing understanding on the potential mechanisms that underlie our observed associations. One possibility is the potential role of psychotropic drugs, such as antipsychotic medications, as suggested by Ferraris and colleagues.The UK Biobank has data on the use of antipsychotic medications from the baseline questionnaire and from linked primary care prescription data. Inspired by Ferraris and colleagues’ hypothesis, we tested whether use of antipsychotic medications could mediate our reported associations by restricting the analysis to 415 381 individuals with no history of antipsychotic use (98·7% of the original study population). The results from this additional analysis were largely similar to our original results. The fully adjusted odds ratios were 1·49 (95% CI 1·32–1·68), 1·59 (1·38–1·83), and 2·04 (1·59–2·63) for all COVID-19 cases, inpatient COVID-19 cases, and COVID-19-related deaths, respectively, comparing individuals with psychiatric disorders to those without such disorders. Although not a full mediation analysis, these new results suggest little, if any, influence of antipsychotic use on the observed associations.Indeed, previous studies on antipsychotic use and the risk of infection, as cited by Ferraris and colleagues, are observational and, as a result, might suffer from indication bias. In other words, it is possible that the use of antipsychotic medications is more an indicator of the severity of psychiatric disorders, and that the heightened risk of infections among antipsychotic users reflects other biological sequelae of severe psychiatric conditions rather than the medications themselves. However, other psychotropic mediations might also have a role in the associations between psychiatric disorders and susceptibility to various infections, and should be the subject of further studies. For example, in our previous studies on the association between stress-related disorder and risk of life threatening infections and autoimmune disease, we showed a decreased relative risk of immune-related outcomes among patients with stress-related disorder who received long-term treatment with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Similarly, a protective role of benzodiazepines on community-acquired pneumonia has also been reported.In conclusion, although we were not able to confirm Ferraris and colleagues' hypothesis, we agree with them that further research is needed to understand the underlying mechanisms that link pre-existing psychiatric disorders and susceptibility to infections, including COVID-19, focusing on potential genetic, environmental (including use of psychotropic drugs), and epigenetic factors.
Authors: Huan Song; Fang Fang; Gunnar Tomasson; Filip K Arnberg; David Mataix-Cols; Lorena Fernández de la Cruz; Catarina Almqvist; Katja Fall; Unnur A Valdimarsdóttir Journal: JAMA Date: 2018-06-19 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Huan Song; Katja Fall; Fang Fang; Helga Erlendsdóttir; Donghao Lu; David Mataix-Cols; Lorena Fernández de la Cruz; Brian M D'Onofrio; Paul Lichtenstein; Magnús Gottfreðsson; Catarina Almqvist; Unnur A Valdimarsdóttir Journal: BMJ Date: 2019-10-23