Fufa Dawo Bari1. 1. Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Veterinary Public Health, College of Veterinary Medicine and Agriculture, Addis Ababa University, Bishoftu, Ethiopia.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: In 2017 infectious bursal disease viruses (IBDVs) were reclassified into genogroups based on nature of clustering on a phylogenetic tree constructed using VP2 gene sequence data rather than according to their pathotype and/or antigenic types. Ethiopian IBD viruses were not reclassified according to the proposed genogrouping. METHODS: In order to genogroup the Ethiopian IBDVs, available VP2 gene sequences data together with reference strain sequences were retrieved from GenBank and genogrouped as recently recommended based on evolutionary tree reconstruction and determination of their clustering on the phylogenetic tree. RESULTS: The Ethiopian IBDVs were grouped into genogroups 1 and 3 that antigenically represent classically virulent and very virulent IBDVs, respectively. The genogroup 1 IBDVs were clustered with the vaccine strain while the genogroup 3 viruses were clustered with four known viruses belonging to sub-genogroup 3a and sub-genogroup 3b. Almost half of the Ethiopian IBDVs reported did not cluster with the specific sub-groups of genogroup 3; rather, the isolates were clustered differently suggesting they deserve a different sub-genogroup tentatively proposed as 3d. The two genogroups observed based on clustering on a phylogenetic tree were supported by corresponding deduced amino acid changes in similar positions in VP2 sequences. In addition, virulence marker amino acid genes coupled with second major hydrophilic region (amino acid positions 314-325) were predicted in these sequences that could be responsible for the occurrence of IBD outbreaks. CONCLUSION: A new sub-genogroup of IBDVs, 3d, were observed in the sequences that could be one of the reasons for the frequent occurrence of IBD outbreaks and questions the protective potential of the existing vaccine. To institute disease control in the country, the effectiveness of the vaccine in use needs to be assessed in vivo against both genogroups 1 and 3 viruses and all three sub-genogroup 3 viruses circulating in the country.
INTRODUCTION: In 2017 infectious bursal disease viruses (IBDVs) were reclassified into genogroups based on nature of clustering on a phylogenetic tree constructed using VP2 gene sequence data rather than according to their pathotype and/or antigenic types. Ethiopian IBD viruses were not reclassified according to the proposed genogrouping. METHODS: In order to genogroup the Ethiopian IBDVs, available VP2 gene sequences data together with reference strain sequences were retrieved from GenBank and genogrouped as recently recommended based on evolutionary tree reconstruction and determination of their clustering on the phylogenetic tree. RESULTS: The Ethiopian IBDVs were grouped into genogroups 1 and 3 that antigenically represent classically virulent and very virulent IBDVs, respectively. The genogroup 1 IBDVs were clustered with the vaccine strain while the genogroup 3 viruses were clustered with four known viruses belonging to sub-genogroup 3a and sub-genogroup 3b. Almost half of the Ethiopian IBDVs reported did not cluster with the specific sub-groups of genogroup 3; rather, the isolates were clustered differently suggesting they deserve a different sub-genogroup tentatively proposed as 3d. The two genogroups observed based on clustering on a phylogenetic tree were supported by corresponding deduced amino acid changes in similar positions in VP2 sequences. In addition, virulence marker amino acid genes coupled with second major hydrophilic region (amino acid positions 314-325) were predicted in these sequences that could be responsible for the occurrence of IBD outbreaks. CONCLUSION: A new sub-genogroup of IBDVs, 3d, were observed in the sequences that could be one of the reasons for the frequent occurrence of IBD outbreaks and questions the protective potential of the existing vaccine. To institute disease control in the country, the effectiveness of the vaccine in use needs to be assessed in vivo against both genogroups 1 and 3 viruses and all three sub-genogroup 3 viruses circulating in the country.