Literature DB >> 33665057

Meaningful Use of Electronic Health Records and Ambulatory Healthcare Quality Measures.

Duaa Alammari1, Jim E Banta2, Huma Shah2, Ellen Reibling3, Majed Ramadan2.   

Abstract

Introduction Electronic Health Record (EHR) adoption rates for office-based physicians doubled between 2008 and 2015, from 42% to 89%, and more than 60% of all office-based physicians achieved meaningful use by 2016. The US government has paid billions of dollars in incentives to promote EHR meaningful use. Nonetheless, evidence linking EHR meaningful use to quality measures improvements is limited. Objective This study aims to examine the relationship between EHR meaningful use and capabilities among four quality measures in an ambulatory healthcare setting. Study design A cross-sectional study design of the 2015-2016 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey dataset. Methods We used adjusted multivariate regression models to examine associations between (a) EHR meaningful use and (b) 10 EHR-computerized capabilities, with four quality measures (blood pressure screening, tobacco use screening, obesity screening, and obesity education). Results We analyzed 30,787 office visits, representing an annual estimate of 680 million national office visits. Results showed that 95% of visits were to offices meeting EHR meaningful use criteria. We found one positive association between EHR meaningful use and obesity screening (OR= 3.5, 95% CI [1.742-6.917]). We also found eight positive associations between EHR capabilities and three quality measures (screening for blood pressure and obesity, and obesity education). These associations included five EHR-computerized capabilities: "record patient problem list", "view lab results", "Reminders for interventions/screening", "Order lab results" and "Recording clinical notes". No EHR capability was associated with screening for tobacco use. Conclusions We looked at a handful of screening-oriented quality measures in ambulatory healthcare and found limited associations with EHR meaningful use but multiple positively significant associations with EHR capabilities. Although EHR meaningful use has become more commonly used, offering substantial administrative efficiency over paper records, current patterns of EHR meaningful use do not always appear to translate into a better quality of care in physician offices. However, quality measures used represent limited procedures for a handful of specific conditions and not the overall healthcare aspect.
Copyright © 2021, Alammari et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ambulatory care setting; electronic health records; meaningful use; national ambulatory medical care survey; offices-based physician; quality measures; screening

Year:  2021        PMID: 33665057      PMCID: PMC7924813          DOI: 10.7759/cureus.13036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cureus        ISSN: 2168-8184


  12 in total

1.  Electronic health record use and the quality of ambulatory care in the United States.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Linder; Jun Ma; David W Bates; Blackford Middleton; Randall S Stafford
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2007-07-09

2.  Clinical benefits of electronic health record use: national findings.

Authors:  Jennifer King; Vaishali Patel; Eric W Jamoom; Michael F Furukawa
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-12-21       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Associations between healthcare quality and use of electronic health record functions in ambulatory care.

Authors:  Jessica S Ancker; Lisa M Kern; Alison Edwards; Sarah Nosal; Daniel M Stein; Diane Hauser; Rainu Kaushal
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  EHR evolution: policy and legislation forces changing the EHR.

Authors:  Micky Tripathi
Journal:  J AHIMA       Date:  2012-10

5.  Meaningful use of electronic health record systems and process quality of care: evidence from a panel data analysis of U.S. acute-care hospitals.

Authors:  Ajit Appari; M Eric Johnson; Denise L Anthony
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  The meaningful use of electronic health records and health care quality.

Authors:  Lisa M Kern; Alison Edwards; Rainu Kaushal
Journal:  Am J Med Qual       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 1.852

7.  Meaningful use and quality of care.

Authors:  Lipika Samal; Adam Wright; Michael J Healey; Jeffrey A Linder; David W Bates
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 21.873

8.  Physician Participation in Meaningful Use and Quality of Care for Medicare Fee-for-Service Enrollees.

Authors:  Hye-Young Jung; Mark Aaron Unruh; Joshua R Vest; Lawrence P Casalino; Lisa M Kern; Zachary M Grinspan; Yuhua Bao; Rainu Kaushal
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 5.562

9.  Electronic health records and clinical decision support systems: impact on national ambulatory care quality.

Authors:  Max J Romano; Randall S Stafford
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2011-01-24

10.  Electronic medical record features and seven quality of care measures in physician offices.

Authors:  Chun-Ju Hsiao; Jill A Marsteller; Alan E Simon
Journal:  Am J Med Qual       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 1.852

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.