Literature DB >> 33665052

An Urban Center Experience Exploring Barriers to Adherence to Endoscopic Surveillance for Non-Dysplastic Barrett's Esophagus.

Mahmoud Isseh1, Laurel Mueller2, Hussna Abunafeesa2, Zaid Imam3, Dania Shakaroun2, Mouhanna Abu Ghanimeh4, Nazih Isseh5, Joseph Miller6, Syed-Mohammed Jafri4, Adrienne Lenhart7.   

Abstract

Background Data regarding barriers to Barrett's esophagus (BE) surveillance is limited. Studying an urban center population, we aimed to characterize non-dysplastic BE surveillance rates and identify health, racial, and socioeconomic disparities affecting surveillance. Methods Patients with biopsy-confirmed BE were retrospectively identified between January 2002 and December 2012. Non-dysplastic BE patients were analyzed for adherence to established surveillance guidelines. Demographic, racial, comorbidities, and socioeconomic variables were extracted. Annual gross income (AGI) was utilized as a marker of socioeconomic status (SES). Univariate and multivariate analyses compared adherent vs. non-adherent patients to surveillance guidelines. Results A total of 217 patients with non-dysplastic BE were analyzed. The majority were male (67.3%) and Caucasian (75.6%), with only 47.5% adherent with the first surveillance endoscopy. Patients with a high average AGI were more likely to be adherent with the initial surveillance endoscopy than those with low AGI (p=0.032). Initial compliance with first surveillance was associated with better surveillance at regular intervals (p=0.001). No significant differences in age, primary language, insurance type, marital status, or Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) between adherent and non-adherent patients were found. Conclusions Although overall adherence to guidelines was suboptimal, this study identifies important socioeconomic disparities in the endoscopic surveillance for non-dysplastic BE. Identifying and understanding the barriers to care among these lower socioeconomic groups may ultimately lead to improved screening compliance and early BE detection.
Copyright © 2021, Isseh et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  barrett’s dysplasia; barrett’s esophagus; surveillance

Year:  2021        PMID: 33665052      PMCID: PMC7924167          DOI: 10.7759/cureus.13030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cureus        ISSN: 2168-8184


  26 in total

1.  Surveillance of Barrett's oesophagus: physicians' practices and review of current guidelines.

Authors:  J W van Sandick; J F Bartelsman; J J van Lanschot; G N Tytgat; H Obertop
Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.566

2.  Practice patterns among U.S. gastroenterologists regarding endoscopic management of Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Mandeep Singh; Neil Gupta; Srinivas Gaddam; Gokulakrishnan Balasubramanian; Sachin Wani; Preetika Sinh; Kamran Aghaie; April D Higbee; Amit Rastogi; Vijay Kanakadandi; Ajay Bansal; Prateek Sharma
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 9.427

3.  American Gastroenterological Association medical position statement on the management of Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Stuart J Spechler; Prateek Sharma; Rhonda F Souza; John M Inadomi; Nicholas J Shaheen
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  African Americans with Barrett's esophagus are less likely to have dysplasia at biopsy.

Authors:  Joe E Khoury; Sian Chisholm; M Mazen Jamal; Carlos Palacio; Sunitha Pudhota; Kenneth J Vega
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2011-09-11       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 5.  Surveillance of Barrett's oesophagus: exploring the uncertainty through systematic review, expert workshop and economic modelling.

Authors:  R Garside; M Pitt; M Somerville; K Stein; A Price; N Gilbert
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.014

6.  Management of Barrett's esophagus in the UK: overtreated and underbiopsied but improved by the introduction of a national randomized trial.

Authors:  Debasish Das; Savid Ishaq; Rebecca Harrison; Kiran Kosuri; Edward Harper; John Decaestecker; Richard Sampliner; Stephen Attwood; Hugh Barr; Peter Watson; Paul Moayyedi; Janusz Jankowski
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-04-28       Impact factor: 10.864

7.  Race, ethnicity, sex and temporal differences in Barrett's oesophagus diagnosis: a large community-based study, 1994-2006.

Authors:  D A Corley; A Kubo; T R Levin; G Block; L Habel; G Rumore; C Quesenberry; P Buffler
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  ACG Clinical Guideline: Diagnosis and Management of Barrett's Esophagus.

Authors:  Nicholas J Shaheen; Gary W Falk; Prasad G Iyer; Lauren B Gerson
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 10.864

9.  Life-course socioeconomic status and breast and cervical cancer screening: analysis of the WHO's Study on Global Ageing and Adult Health (SAGE).

Authors:  Tomi Akinyemiju; Kemi Ogunsina; Swati Sakhuja; Valentine Ogbhodo; Dejana Braithwaite
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Association of Race and Socioeconomic Status With Colorectal Cancer Screening, Colorectal Cancer Risk, and Mortality in Southern US Adults.

Authors:  Shaneda Warren Andersen; William J Blot; Loren Lipworth; Mark Steinwandel; Harvey J Murff; Wei Zheng
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2019-12-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.