Literature DB >> 33665018

Phenotype characteristics of gastric epithelial mucus in patients with different gastric diseases: from superficial gastritis to gastric cancer.

Nannan Dong1,2,3, Rui Guo1,2,3, Yuehua Gong1,2,3, Yuan Yuan1,2,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Gastric gland mucin is important for maintaining the basic function of the gastric mucosa, protecting it from foreign substances and reducing the occurrence of gastric diseases. Exploring the phenotype of gastric gland mucus changes during the progression of gastric disease is of great clinical significance.
METHODS: A total of 483 patients with different gastric diseases were collected in this study, including 82 superficial gastritis (SG), 81 atrophic gastritis (AG), 168 dysplasia (GD), and 152 gastric cancer (GC). Mucin staining was performed using HID-ABpH2.5-PAS method and was further grouped according to the mucin coloration.
RESULTS: The phenotypic characteristics of mucin during disease progression were divided into neutral, acidic, and mucus-free types. Furthermore, acidic mucus can be divided into type I, type II, and type III. The SG group was dominated by neutral mucus (100%), and the AG was dominated by acid mucus (81.48%), which gradually increased with the severity of atrophy (P < 0.05). The GD and GC groups were dominated by mucus-free (43.45%, 78.29%), and as the degree of GD worsened, neutral and acidic mucus gradually decreased and mucus-free increased (P < 0.001). From the SG, AG, GD, and GC progression, neutral and acidic mucus gradually decreased, and mucus- free gradually increased. Acidic mucin revealed that type III (red-brown black) mucin was predominant in AG, GD, and GC, and increased with the degree of AG, GD, as well as the biological behavior of GC. In the lesion adjacent to high-grade GD or GC, type III acid mucin is predominant.
CONCLUSION: There were three mucin phenotypes in the process of gastric diseases. With the disease progression, the trend of phenotypic change was that neutral and acidic mucus gradually decreased and mucus-free increased. The appearance of type III mucin suggested a relatively serious phase of gastric diseases and may be a more suitable candidate for follow-up monitoring of patients with GC risk. ©2021 Dong et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gastric disease; Gastric mucus; HID-ABpH2.5-PAS

Year:  2021        PMID: 33665018      PMCID: PMC7916529          DOI: 10.7717/peerj.10822

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PeerJ        ISSN: 2167-8359            Impact factor:   2.984


  34 in total

Review 1.  Mucins in cancer: protection and control of the cell surface.

Authors:  Michael A Hollingsworth; Benjamin J Swanson
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 2.  Reduced αGlcNAc glycosylation on gastric gland mucin is a biomarker of malignant potential for gastric cancer, Barrett's adenocarcinoma, and pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Yamanoi; Jun Nakayama
Journal:  Histochem Cell Biol       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 4.304

3.  Tumor differentiation phenotype in gastric differentiated-type tumors and its relation to tumor invasion and genetic alterations.

Authors:  Kimiyasu Yamazaki; Yusuke Tajima; Reiko Makino; Nobukazu Nishino; Shigeo Aoki; Masanori Kato; Masaaki Sakamoto; Koji Morohara; Tsutomu Kaetsu; Mitsuo Kusano
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-06-28       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  CDX2 expression is increased in gastric cancers with less invasiveness and intestinal mucin phenotype.

Authors:  Gwang Ha Kim; Geun Am Song; Do Youn Park; Soo Han Lee; Dong Hyun Lee; Tae Oh Kim; Hong Jae Jo; Jeong Heo; Dae Hwan Kang; Mong Cho
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.423

5.  Management of epithelial precancerous conditions and lesions in the stomach (MAPS II): European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE), European Helicobacter and Microbiota Study Group (EHMSG), European Society of Pathology (ESP), and Sociedade Portuguesa de Endoscopia Digestiva (SPED) guideline update 2019.

Authors:  Pedro Pimentel-Nunes; Diogo Libânio; Ricardo Marcos-Pinto; Miguel Areia; Marcis Leja; Gianluca Esposito; Monica Garrido; Ilze Kikuste; Francis Megraud; Tamara Matysiak-Budnik; Bruno Annibale; Jean-Marc Dumonceau; Rita Barros; Jean-François Fléjou; Fátima Carneiro; Jeanin E van Hooft; Ernst J Kuipers; Mario Dinis-Ribeiro
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 10.093

6.  Distinction of differentiated type early gastric carcinoma with gastric type mucin expression.

Authors:  K Koseki; T Takizawa; M Koike; M Ito; Z Nihei; K Sugihara
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2000-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines on the diagnosis and management of patients at risk of gastric adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Matthew Banks; David Graham; Marnix Jansen; Takuji Gotoda; Sergio Coda; Massimiliano di Pietro; Noriya Uedo; Pradeep Bhandari; D Mark Pritchard; Ernst J Kuipers; Manuel Rodriguez-Justo; Marco R Novelli; Krish Ragunath; Neil Shepherd; Mario Dinis-Ribeiro
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  Intestinal metaplasia types and the risk of gastric cancer: a cohort study in Slovenia.

Authors:  M I Filipe; N Muñoz; I Matko; I Kato; V Pompe-Kirn; A Jutersek; S Teuchmann; M Benz; T Prijon
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1994-05-01       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 9.  Biology of intestinal metaplasia in 2008: more than a simple phenotypic alteration.

Authors:  L Gutiérrez-González; N A Wright
Journal:  Dig Liver Dis       Date:  2008-04-09       Impact factor: 4.088

10.  Mucin expression in gastric cancer: reappraisal of its clinicopathologic and prognostic significance.

Authors:  Dae Hwan Kim; Nari Shin; Gwang Ha Kim; Geum Am Song; Tae-Yong Jeon; Dong-Heon Kim; Gregory Y Lauwers; Do Youn Park
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 5.534

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.