Literature DB >> 33665013

Behavioral dominance interactions between Nicrophorus orbicollis and N. tomentosus burying beetles (Coleoptera: Silphidae).

Scott D Schrempf1, Kevin W Burke1, Jillian D Wettlaufer1, Paul R Martin1.   

Abstract

Asymmetric interference competition, where one species is behaviorally dominant over another, appears widespread in nature with the potential to structure ecological communities through trade-offs between competitive dominance and environmental tolerance. The details of how species interact and the factors that contribute to behavioral dominance, however, are poorly known for most species, yet such details are important for understanding when and why trade-offs occur. Here, we examine behavioral interactions between two species of burying beetles (Coleoptera: Silphidae) that compete for limited breeding resources (i.e., small vertebrate carcasses) in nature, to identify behaviors involved in interference competition and to test if large body size, species identity, or time of arrival best predict behavioral dominance among species. To test these ideas, we placed same-sex individuals of Nicrophorus orbicollis (early to mid-summer breeder) and N. tomentosus (late summer to fall breeder) into an enclosure together with a 25-30 g mouse carcass (Mus musculus). We then video-recorded all behaviors, including neutral and aggressive interactions, for 13 h per trial (N = 14 trials). For each interaction, we assigned a winner based on which beetle retained its position instead of fleeing or retained possession of the carcass; the overall behavioral dominant was determined as the individual that won the most interactions over the length of the trial. We found that large body size was the best predictor of behavioral dominance. In most interactions, N. orbicollis was larger and dominant over N. tomentosus; however, when N. tomentosus was larger they outcompeted smaller N. orbicollis, illustrating the importance of body size in aggressive contests. The order of arrival to the carcass (priority effects) did not predict behavioral dominance. The larger size and abundance of N. orbicollis in nature suggest a competitive asymmetry between the species, supporting the idea that N. orbicollis constrains the ability of N. tomentosus to breed earlier in the summer.
© 2021 Schrempf et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Behavioral dominance; Burying beetle; Community ecology; Competition; Entomology; Nicrophorus orbicollis; Nicrophorus tomentosus; Silphidae; Species coexistence; Species interactions

Year:  2021        PMID: 33665013      PMCID: PMC7912668          DOI: 10.7717/peerj.10797

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PeerJ        ISSN: 2167-8359            Impact factor:   2.984


  11 in total

1.  The ecology and behavior of burying beetles.

Authors:  M P Scott
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 19.686

2.  Phylogenetic limiting similarity and competitive exclusion.

Authors:  Cyrille Violle; Diana R Nemergut; Zhichao Pu; Lin Jiang
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2011-06-14       Impact factor: 9.492

3.  Beyond species recognition: somatic state affects long-distance sex pheromone communication.

Authors:  Johanna Chemnitz; Petra C Jentschke; Manfred Ayasse; Sandra Steiger
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 4.  Causes and Consequences of Behavioral Interference between Species.

Authors:  Gregory F Grether; Kathryn S Peiman; Joseph A Tobias; Beren W Robinson
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 17.712

5.  Competition and hybridization drive interspecific territoriality in birds.

Authors:  Jonathan P Drury; Madeline C Cowen; Gregory F Grether
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Spatiotemporal niche partitioning in a specious silphid community (Coleoptera: Silphidae Nicrophorus).

Authors:  Maranda L Keller; Daniel R Howard; Carrie L Hall
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2019-10-25

Review 7.  Ecology and evolution of resource-related heterospecific aggression.

Authors:  Kathryn S Peiman; Beren W Robinson
Journal:  Q Rev Biol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.875

8.  The outcomes of most aggressive interactions among closely related bird species are asymmetric.

Authors:  Paul R Martin; Cameron Freshwater; Cameron K Ghalambor
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  Ecological divergence of burying beetles into the forest canopy.

Authors:  Jillian D Wettlaufer; Kevin W Burke; Adam Schizkoske; David V Beresford; Paul R Martin
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  Morphological correlates of a combat performance trait in the forked fungus beetle, Bolitotherus cornutus.

Authors:  Kyle M Benowitz; Edmund D Brodie; Vincent A Formica
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.