Nicholas Guenzel1, Hongying Dai2. 1. University of Nebraska Medical Center, Lincoln, NE, USA. 2. University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Peer recovery coaches (PRCs) have become a critical tool in addiction treatment in many areas of the world. Despite this fact, no identified research has examined the process or impact of PRC training. Furthermore, no scales were identified to measure trainee confidence in various PRC techniques. The goal of this article is to analyze the process and immediate impact of PRC training of twelve American Indians (AIs) in a culturally-specific program. We focus most specifically on trainee confidence levels. METHODS: No written consent was obtained and completion of the assessment was considered consent. Trainees completed self-assessments before and after the training. The self-assessment examined nine areas ranging from understanding the role of PRCs to knowledge of effective PRC techniques. Paired t-tests were used to assess for changes in individual trainee responses between the pre- and post-assessments. RESULTS: Pre-training responses ranged from moderate to high. Questions with the lowest average confidence levels address PRC activities or specific techniques to facilitate recovery. All nine questions showed statistically significant mean improvements in the post-training self-assessments. Questions regarding specific PRC activities and techniques showed the greatest improvement. Questions relating to helping people more generally showed the smallest improvement. Average post-training responses fell within a very narrow range indicating relatively consistent confidence levels across skills. Analysis indicates participants were possibly over-confident in certain areas (i.e., maintaining boundaries). This small pilot represents an initial attempt to measure confidence levels of PRC trainees. The findings may inform future training by identifying certain areas where emphasis might be most helpful for trainees. In addition, it is hoped that this work will encourage more systematic analysis of the impact of PRC training on individuals.
BACKGROUND: Peer recovery coaches (PRCs) have become a critical tool in addiction treatment in many areas of the world. Despite this fact, no identified research has examined the process or impact of PRC training. Furthermore, no scales were identified to measure trainee confidence in various PRC techniques. The goal of this article is to analyze the process and immediate impact of PRC training of twelve American Indians (AIs) in a culturally-specific program. We focus most specifically on trainee confidence levels. METHODS: No written consent was obtained and completion of the assessment was considered consent. Trainees completed self-assessments before and after the training. The self-assessment examined nine areas ranging from understanding the role of PRCs to knowledge of effective PRC techniques. Paired t-tests were used to assess for changes in individual trainee responses between the pre- and post-assessments. RESULTS: Pre-training responses ranged from moderate to high. Questions with the lowest average confidence levels address PRC activities or specific techniques to facilitate recovery. All nine questions showed statistically significant mean improvements in the post-training self-assessments. Questions regarding specific PRC activities and techniques showed the greatest improvement. Questions relating to helping people more generally showed the smallest improvement. Average post-training responses fell within a very narrow range indicating relatively consistent confidence levels across skills. Analysis indicates participants were possibly over-confident in certain areas (i.e., maintaining boundaries). This small pilot represents an initial attempt to measure confidence levels of PRC trainees. The findings may inform future training by identifying certain areas where emphasis might be most helpful for trainees. In addition, it is hoped that this work will encourage more systematic analysis of the impact of PRC training on individuals.
Authors: Sharon Reif; Lisa Braude; D Russell Lyman; Richard H Dougherty; Allen S Daniels; Sushmita Shoma Ghose; Onaje Salim; Miriam E Delphin-Rittmon Journal: Psychiatr Serv Date: 2014-07 Impact factor: 3.084
Authors: Travis A Cos; Archana Bodas LaPollo; Mara Aussendorf; Jason M Williams; Kimberly Malayter; David S Festinger Journal: J Clin Psychol Med Settings Date: 2020-12
Authors: David Eddie; Lauren Hoffman; Corrie Vilsaint; Alexandra Abry; Brandon Bergman; Bettina Hoeppner; Charles Weinstein; John F Kelly Journal: Front Psychol Date: 2019-06-13
Authors: Margo Rowan; Nancy Poole; Beverley Shea; Joseph P Gone; David Mykota; Marwa Farag; Carol Hopkins; Laura Hall; Christopher Mushquash; Colleen Dell Journal: Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy Date: 2014-09-01