Literature DB >> 33664794

Cropland connectivity affects genetic divergence of Colorado potato beetle along an invasion front.

Fangyuan Yang1,2, Ning Liu2, Michael S Crossley3, Pengcheng Wang2,4, Zhuo Ma2,4, Jianjun Guo1, Runzhi Zhang2,4.   

Abstract

The population genetic structure of invasive species can be strongly affected by environmental and landscape barriers to dispersal. Disentangling the relative contributions of these factors to genetic divergence among invading populations is a fundamental goal of landscape genetics with important implications for invasion management. Here, we relate patterns of genetic divergence in a global invasive agricultural pest, Colorado potato beetle (CPB; Leptinotarsa decemlineata), to environmental and landscape factors along an invasion front in Northwestern China. We first used microsatellite markers and spatial-temporal samples to assess broad patterns of genetic diversity as well as fine-scale changes in patterns of genetic divergence. We then distinguished the relative contributions of five factors to genetic divergence among front populations: geographic distance (isolation by distance), climate dissimilarity (isolation by environment), and least-cost distances (isolation by resistance) modeled with three factors: climate suitability, cropland cover, and road networks. Genetic diversity broadly decreased from West to East, with the exception being Eastern China. Low levels of genetic diversity and varying degrees of divergence were observed in Northwestern China, reflecting the potential effect of landscape heterogeneity. Least-cost distance across cropland cover was most positively correlated with genetic divergence, suggesting a role of croplands in facilitating gene flow. The contribution of climate to genetic divergence was secondary, whether modeled in terms of local adaptability or connectivity of the climatic landscape, suggesting that constraints to CPB gene flow imposed by a harsh climate may be ameliorated in agricultural landscapes. No evidence was found for an obvious effect of road networks on genetic divergence and population structuring. Our study provides an example of how agricultural landscape connectivity can facilitate the spread of invasive pests, even across a broad climatic gradient. More broadly, our findings can guide decisions about future land management for mitigating further spread.
© 2020 The Authors. Evolutionary Applications published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biological invasion front; cropland connectivity; genetic divergence; landscape genetics; least‐cost path

Year:  2020        PMID: 33664794      PMCID: PMC7896701          DOI: 10.1111/eva.13140

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evol Appl        ISSN: 1752-4571            Impact factor:   5.183


  38 in total

1.  Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study.

Authors:  G Evanno; S Regnaut; J Goudet
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 6.185

2.  Isolation by Distance.

Authors:  S Wright
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1943-03       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 3.  Genetic monitoring as a promising tool for conservation and management.

Authors:  Michael K Schwartz; Gordon Luikart; Robin S Waples
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2006-09-07       Impact factor: 17.712

4.  CLUMPP: a cluster matching and permutation program for dealing with label switching and multimodality in analysis of population structure.

Authors:  Mattias Jakobsson; Noah A Rosenberg
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-05-07       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 5.  Adaptive evolution in invasive species.

Authors:  Peter J Prentis; John R U Wilson; Eleanor E Dormontt; David M Richardson; Andrew J Lowe
Journal:  Trends Plant Sci       Date:  2008-05-28       Impact factor: 18.313

6.  adegenet: a R package for the multivariate analysis of genetic markers.

Authors:  Thibaut Jombart
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 6.937

7.  Local adaptation, dispersal evolution, and the spatial eco-evolutionary dynamics of invasion.

Authors:  Martín Andrade-Restrepo; Nicolas Champagnat; Régis Ferrière
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 9.492

Review 8.  Impacts of biological invasions: what's what and the way forward.

Authors:  Daniel Simberloff; Jean-Louis Martin; Piero Genovesi; Virginie Maris; David A Wardle; James Aronson; Franck Courchamp; Bella Galil; Emili García-Berthou; Michel Pascal; Petr Pyšek; Ronaldo Sousa; Eric Tabacchi; Montserrat Vilà
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 17.712

9.  Genetic drift during the spread phase of a biological invasion.

Authors:  Nadège Bélouard; Jean-Marc Paillisson; Adrien Oger; Anne-Laure Besnard; Eric J Petit
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 6.185

10.  Effects of contemporary agricultural land cover on Colorado potato beetle genetic differentiation in the Columbia Basin and Central Sands.

Authors:  Michael S Crossley; Silvia I Rondon; Sean D Schoville
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 2.912

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Approved Genetically Modified Potatoes (Solanum tuberosum) for Improved Stress Resistance and Food Safety.

Authors:  Bára Křížkovská; Jitka Viktorová; Jan Lipov
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2022-09-14       Impact factor: 5.895

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.