Wan Mohd Azam Wan Mohd Yunus1,2, Siti Khadijah Zainal Badri3, Siti Aisyah Panatik1, Firdaus Mukhtar4. 1. Department of Psychology, School of Human Resource Development and Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai, Malaysia. 2. Research Centre for Child Psychiatry, University of Turku, Turku, Finland. 3. Division of Organisational and Applied Psychology, Business School, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, University of Nottingham, Semenyih, Malaysia. 4. Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Malaysia.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Malaysia's first Movement Control Order (MCO) or "lockdown" was in place for 6 weeks to curb the spread of coronavirus disease (COVID-19). Consequently, all universities were forced to close temporarily with abrupt changes to teaching and learning activities. However, there has been a lack of consensus regarding students' actual psychological status and mental health during the MCO implementation. This study investigates the link, state, and differences of negative emotional symptoms, happiness, and work-life balance among university students during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methodology: This study recruited 1,005 university students across Malaysia. Data was collected online using Qualtrics to measure negative emotional symptoms (The Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale), happiness (The Oxford Happiness Inventory), and work-life balance (Work-Family Conflict Scale). All data was analyzed using SPSS version 25 and AMOS version 26 using T-test, ANOVA, logistic regression analyses, and path analysis method. Findings: Findings indicated that 22, 34.3, and 37.3% of the university students scored moderate to extremely severe levels of stress, anxiety, and depression symptoms, respectively. Half scored rather happy or very happy (50%) for happiness levels. Meanwhile, 50.4 and 39.4% scored high to very high levels of work-to-family and family-to-work conflict. Significant differences in stress, anxiety, depression, happiness, work-family conflict, and family-work conflict were recorded across different demographic factors. Happiness was found to be a protective factor with a lesser likelihood of experiencing severe stress (OR = 0.240, 95% CI: 0.180, 0.321), anxiety (OR = 0.336, 95% CI: 0.273, 0.414), and depression (OR = 0.121, 95% CI: 0.088, 0.165) with higher happiness levels. Higher score of work-to-family conflict contributes to greater odds of having severe levels of anxiety (OR = 1.453, 95% CI: 1.161, 1.818). While greater likelihood of developing severe stress (OR = 1.468, 95% CI: 1.109, 1.943) and severe anxiety (OR = 1.317, 95% CI: 1.059, 1.638) under increasing score of family-to-work conflict. Besides, happiness is found to negatively linked with lower negative emotional symptoms, while work-family conflict and family-work conflict are positively linked with higher negative emotional symptoms. Conclusion: Lockdown implementation during the COVID-19 pandemic appears to have a significant impact on university students' negative emotional symptoms, happiness, and work-life balance. Happiness was found to be a protective factor while the state of work-life balance is a risk factor that can predict students' negative emotional symptoms.
Background and Aims: Malaysia's first Movement Control Order (MCO) or "lockdown" was in place for 6 weeks to curb the spread of coronavirus disease (COVID-19). Consequently, all universities were forced to close temporarily with abrupt changes to teaching and learning activities. However, there has been a lack of consensus regarding students' actual psychological status and mental health during the MCO implementation. This study investigates the link, state, and differences of negative emotional symptoms, happiness, and work-life balance among university students during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methodology: This study recruited 1,005 university students across Malaysia. Data was collected online using Qualtrics to measure negative emotional symptoms (The Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale), happiness (The Oxford Happiness Inventory), and work-life balance (Work-Family Conflict Scale). All data was analyzed using SPSS version 25 and AMOS version 26 using T-test, ANOVA, logistic regression analyses, and path analysis method. Findings: Findings indicated that 22, 34.3, and 37.3% of the university students scored moderate to extremely severe levels of stress, anxiety, and depression symptoms, respectively. Half scored rather happy or very happy (50%) for happiness levels. Meanwhile, 50.4 and 39.4% scored high to very high levels of work-to-family and family-to-work conflict. Significant differences in stress, anxiety, depression, happiness, work-family conflict, and family-work conflict were recorded across different demographic factors. Happiness was found to be a protective factor with a lesser likelihood of experiencing severe stress (OR = 0.240, 95% CI: 0.180, 0.321), anxiety (OR = 0.336, 95% CI: 0.273, 0.414), and depression (OR = 0.121, 95% CI: 0.088, 0.165) with higher happiness levels. Higher score of work-to-family conflict contributes to greater odds of having severe levels of anxiety (OR = 1.453, 95% CI: 1.161, 1.818). While greater likelihood of developing severe stress (OR = 1.468, 95% CI: 1.109, 1.943) and severe anxiety (OR = 1.317, 95% CI: 1.059, 1.638) under increasing score of family-to-work conflict. Besides, happiness is found to negatively linked with lower negative emotional symptoms, while work-family conflict and family-work conflict are positively linked with higher negative emotional symptoms. Conclusion: Lockdown implementation during the COVID-19 pandemic appears to have a significant impact on university students' negative emotional symptoms, happiness, and work-life balance. Happiness was found to be a protective factor while the state of work-life balance is a risk factor that can predict students' negative emotional symptoms.
Authors: Bach Xuan Tran; Giang Thu Vu; Carl A Latkin; Hai Quang Pham; Hai Thanh Phan; Huong Thi Le; Roger C M Ho Journal: Saf Sci Date: 2020-05-12 Impact factor: 4.877
Authors: Wanqiu Tan; Fengyi Hao; Roger S McIntyre; Li Jiang; Xiaojiang Jiang; Ling Zhang; Xinling Zhao; Yiran Zou; Yirong Hu; Xi Luo; Zhisong Zhang; Andre Lai; Roger Ho; Bach Tran; Cyrus Ho; Wilson Tam Journal: Brain Behav Immun Date: 2020-04-23 Impact factor: 7.217
Authors: Walton Wider; Nasehah Mohd Taib; Mohd Wafiy Akmal Bin Ahmad Khadri; Foon Yee Yip; Surianti Lajuma; Prasath A/L Punniamoorthy Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-06-23 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Mohd Amiruddin Mohd Kassim; Nicholas Tze Ping Pang; Assis Kamu; Gökmen Arslan; Noor Hassline Mohamed; Syaza Putri Zainudin; Friska Ayu; Chong Mun Ho Journal: Int J Ment Health Addict Date: 2021-08-26 Impact factor: 11.555
Authors: Cezary Kuśnierz; Aleksandra M Rogowska; Karolina Chilicka; Iuliia Pavlova; Dominika Ochnik Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-09-02 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Dina Di Giacomo; Alessandra Martelli; Federica Guerra; Federica Cielo; Jessica Ranieri Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-07-02 Impact factor: 3.390