Ana P Fugolin1, Matthew G Logan1, Alexander J Kendall1, Jack L Ferracane1, Carmem S Pfeifer2. 1. Biomaterials and Biomechanics, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA. 2. Biomaterials and Biomechanics, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA. Electronic address: pfeiferc@ohsu.edu.
Abstract
The stability of the bond between polymeric adhesives to mineralized substrates is crucial in many biomedical applications. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of methyl substitution at the α- and β-carbons on the kinetics of polymerization, monomer hydrolytic stability, and long-term bond strength to dentin for methacrylamide- and methacrylate-based crosslinked networks for dental adhesive applications. METHODS: Secondary methacrylamides (α-CH3 substituted=1-methyl HEMAM, β-CH3 substituted=2-methyl HEMAM, and unsubstituted=HEMAM) and OH-terminated methacrylates (α- and β-CH3 mixture=1-methyl HEMA and 2-methyl HEMA, and unsubstituted=HEMA) were copolymerized with urethane dimethacrylate. The kinetics of photopolymerization were followed in real-time using near-IR spectroscopy. Monomer hydrolysis kinetics were followed by NMR spectroscopy in water at pH 1 over 30 days. Solvated adhesives (40 vol% ethanol) were used to bond composite to dentin and microtensile bond strength (μTBS) measured after 24h and 6 months storage in water at 37°C. RESULTS: The rate of polymerization increased in the following order: OH-terminated methacrylates≥methacrylamides>NH2-terminated methacrylates, with minimal effect of the substitution. Final conversion ranged between 79% for 1-methyl AEMA and 94% for HEMA. 1-methyl-HEMAM showed the highest and most stable μTBS, while HEMA showed a 37% reduction after six months All groups showed measurable degradation after up to 4 days in pH 1, with the methacrylamides showing less degradation than the methacrylates. Additionally, transesterification products were observed in the methacrylamide groups. SIGNIFICANCE: Amide monomers were significantly more stable to hydrolysis than the analogous methacrylates. The addition of a α- or β-CH3 groups increased the rate of hydrolysis, with the magnitude of the effect tracking with the expected base-catalyzed hydrolysis of esters or amides, but opposite in influence. The α-CH3 substituted secondary methacrylamide, 1-methyl HEMAM, showed the most stable adhesive interface. A side reaction was observed with transesterification of the monomers studied under ambient conditions, which was not expected under the relatively mild conditions used here, which warrants further investigation.
The stability of the bond between polymeric adhesives to mineralized substrates is crucial in many biomedical applications. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of methyl substitution at the α- and β-carbons on the kinetics of polymerization, monomer hydrolytic stability, and long-term bond strength to dentin for methacrylamide- and methacrylate-based crosslinked networks for dental adhesive applications. METHODS: Secondary methacrylamides (α-CH3 substituted=1-methyl HEMAM, β-CH3 substituted=2-methyl HEMAM, and unsubstituted=HEMAM) and OH-terminated methacrylates (α- and β-CH3 mixture=1-methyl HEMA and 2-methyl HEMA, and unsubstituted=HEMA) were copolymerized with urethane dimethacrylate. The kinetics of photopolymerization were followed in real-time using near-IR spectroscopy. Monomer hydrolysis kinetics were followed by NMR spectroscopy in water at pH 1 over 30 days. Solvated adhesives (40 vol% ethanol) were used to bond composite to dentin and microtensile bond strength (μTBS) measured after 24h and 6 months storage in water at 37°C. RESULTS: The rate of polymerization increased in the following order: OH-terminated methacrylates≥methacrylamides>NH2-terminated methacrylates, with minimal effect of the substitution. Final conversion ranged between 79% for 1-methyl AEMA and 94% for HEMA. 1-methyl-HEMAM showed the highest and most stable μTBS, while HEMA showed a 37% reduction after six months All groups showed measurable degradation after up to 4 days in pH 1, with the methacrylamides showing less degradation than the methacrylates. Additionally, transesterification products were observed in the methacrylamide groups. SIGNIFICANCE: Amide monomers were significantly more stable to hydrolysis than the analogous methacrylates. The addition of a α- or β-CH3 groups increased the rate of hydrolysis, with the magnitude of the effect tracking with the expected base-catalyzed hydrolysis of esters or amides, but opposite in influence. The α-CH3 substituted secondary methacrylamide, 1-methyl HEMAM, showed the most stable adhesive interface. A side reaction was observed with transesterification of the monomers studied under ambient conditions, which was not expected under the relatively mild conditions used here, which warrants further investigation.
Authors: P M C Scaffa; C M P Vidal; N Barros; T F Gesteira; A K Carmona; L Breschi; D H Pashley; L Tjäderhane; I L S Tersariol; F D Nascimento; M R Carrilho Journal: J Dent Res Date: 2012-01-19 Impact factor: 6.116
Authors: L M Barcelos; M G Borges; C J Soares; M S Menezes; V Huynh; M G Logan; A P P Fugolin; C S Pfeifer Journal: Dent Mater Date: 2020-01-28 Impact factor: 5.304
Authors: Ana Karina B Bedran-Russo; Patricia N R Pereira; Wagner R Duarte; James L Drummond; Mitsuo Yamauchi Journal: J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 3.368
Authors: Leo Tjäderhane; Fabio D Nascimento; Lorenzo Breschi; Annalisa Mazzoni; Ivarne L S Tersariol; Saulo Geraldeli; Arzu Tezvergil-Mutluay; Marcela R Carrilho; Ricardo M Carvalho; Franklin R Tay; David H Pashley Journal: Dent Mater Date: 2012-08-16 Impact factor: 5.304
Authors: R Seseogullari-Dirihan; F Apollonio; A Mazzoni; L Tjaderhane; D Pashley; L Breschi; A Tezvergil-Mutluay Journal: Dent Mater Date: 2016-01-04 Impact factor: 5.304